Korean J Urol.
2001 Jul;42(7):736-743.
The Effect of Cold Baths after Hot Baths on Spermatogenesis in Rat Testicles
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School,
Kwangju, Korea.
Abstract
-
PURPOSE: It has been reported that exposure of the testicles to high temperature
through frequent saunas or hot baths causes impairment of spermatogenesis, however,
there are few studies which offer ways to prevent it. The aim of this study is to
evaluate the effect of a cold bath in preventing impaired spermatogenesis caused by
exposure to a hot bath in the rat model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Forty-five white male Sprague-Dawley rats (200-230gm) were
divided into 3 groups; control, hot bath, hot followed by cold bath groups. The hot
bath group was assigned to the hot bath (41-43oC) for 10 minutes and then exposed
to the room temperature (23-24oC) for 3 minutes, whereas the hot followed by cold
bath group was assigned to the cold bath (18-20oC) after the hot bath. Each procedure
was repeated twice daily and 3 days a week for 4 weeks. Five randomly selected
rats from each group were sacrified just after baths, and 4 and 8 weeks later. The
testicular weight, the mean numbers of mature spermatids, Sertoli cells, spermatid to
Sertoli cell ratio and tubular diameter were measured in each group. Two way analyses
of variance (ANOVA) were performed for a statistical analysis.
RESULTS
Just after completion of baths, the weight of testicle, the number of mature
spermatid cells, the spermatid to Sertoli cell ratio and the tubular diameter significantly
decreased in the hot bath group (0.71 +/- 0.08g, 0 +/- 0, 0 +/- 0, 0.20 +/- 0.01mm) compared
to the control group (1.57 +/- 0.67g, 139.85 +/- 29.70, 7.24 +/- 1.36, 0.32 +/- 0.02mm), re
spectively (p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the hot
followed by cold bath group (1.36 +/- 0.20g, 127.00 +/- 26.14, 6.30 +/- 1.14, 0.31 +/- 0.01mm)
and the control group, respectively. On the other hand, there was no significant dif
ference between the hot bath group and the control group in the number of Sertoli
cells per seminiferous tubules (p=0.110). After 4 and 8 weeks, the number of mature
spermatids improved in the hot bath group despite showing significantly decreased
findings compared with the control and hot followed by cold bath groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The hot bath treatment significantly decreased spermatogenesis in the
testicles of the male rat, whereas it was preserved in the cold bath after the hot bath.
This result suggests that a cold bath is recommanded immediately after a hot bath
to help impaired spermatogenesis caused by frequent hot baths.