Usefulness of Dipyridamole and Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in Myocardial Infarction

Lim, Sang Wook; Kwon, Hyuck Moon; Jang, Yang Soo; Kim, Hyun Seung

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The dipyridamole and dobutamine stress echocardiography have been studied as a non-invasive diagnostic test in coronary artery disease. Recently, some authors have extended the usefulness of these tests to predicting the prognosis of myocardial infarction patients. But as far as we know, there was no literature which tried boh tests to the same infarcted patients group. So, we performed both tests in the 23 infarcted patients to compare and evaluate both tests as predicting the prognosis in myocardial infarction.
METHODS
Patients underwent (1) two-dimensional echocardiography under basal condition and after dipyridamole infusion for 4 minites at the dose of 0.14mg/kg/min, (2) another two dimensional echocardiography under basal and during dobutamine infusion at each dose of 5 to a maximum of 20microg/kg/min at 1 or 2 days after dipyridamole stress echocardiography, and (3) coronary and left ventricular angiography. Preinfusion and peak infusion images were analyzed independently by two different observers using Nova Micro Sonic soft were(DataVueII and ColorVue II analysis system). The segmental wall motions were scored as follows ; hyperkinetic : 1, normal : 2, hypokinetic : 3, akinetic : 4. THe test response was considered positive if abnormal wall motion and reduced myocardial thickening were observed during drug infusion at the vascular distributions except the akinetic infarcted segment identified during basal condition. The coronary angiography was analyzed by measuring the maximal luminal diameter stenosis with caliper and 50% or greater diameter narrowing was considered significant. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated by comparing echocardiographic prediction and angiographic findings.
RESULTS
1) Among 22 patients with sufficient image in dipyridamole stress echocardiography, 13 patients have myltivessel coronary disease without resting akinesia of non-infarcted segments. Only 5 patients showed positive findings in dipyridamole stress echocardiography(sensitivity, 38.4%). Among 9 patients who has single or minimal disease, 9 patients were negative finding(specificity, 100%). 2) Among 21 patients with sufficient image in dobutamine stress echocardiography, 12 patients have multivessel coronary disease without resting akinesia of non-infarcted segments. 7 patients showed positive finding in dobutamine stress echocardiography(sensitivity, 58.3%). Among 9 patients who has single or minimal disease, 8 patients showed negative finding(specificity, 88.8%). 3) In hemodynamic changes, dipyridamole stress echocardiography showed significant changes in heart rates and double products and dobutamine stress echocardiography showed significant changes in heart rates, systolic blood pressure and double products. 4) There was no significant side effect during both stress tests inacute and old myocardial infarction patients.
CONCLUSION
1) The dobutamine and dipyridamole stress echocardiography are safe and easy test for myocardial infarction patients. 2) The dobutamine stress echocardiography has higher sensitivity than dipyrdamole stress echocardiography for identifying multivessel coronary disease in myocardial infarction patients but the dose of both drugs were relatively small to get the adequate results. So the high dose of drugs must be tried in feature study.