Neurointervention.  2012 Sep;7(2):85-92. 10.5469/neuroint.2012.7.2.85.

Endovascular Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms Using Bare Platinum Axium(TM) Detachable Coils: Immediate and Short-Term Follow-up Results from a Multicenter Registry

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. dikim@yuhs.ac
  • 2Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Radiology, Il San Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
  • 4Department of Radiology, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.
  • 5Department of Radiology, Wonju Christian Hospital, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea.
  • 6Department of Radiology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan, Korea.
  • 7Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Axium(TM) coils were developed to improve the durability of coil-embolized cerebral aneurysms by increasing packing density. The purpose of this prospective multicenter registry was to evaluate the safety and durability of Axium(TM) coils.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
One hundred twenty-six patients with 135 aneurysms of < or = 15 mm in size underwent coil embolization using bare platinum coils, with Axium(TM) coils constituting over 50% of the total coil length. Immediate and short-term follow-up results were prospectively registered and retrospectively evaluated.
RESULTS
Of the 135 aneurysms (83 unruptured and 52 ruptured), immediate post-embolization angiography revealed complete occlusion in 80 aneurysms (59.3%), neck remnants in 47 (34.8%), and incomplete occlusion in 8 (5.9%). The mean packing density was 42.8% (range, 9.5 - 90%) with Axium(TM) coil length constituting a mean of 87.9% of total coil length. The rate of procedure-related complications was 16.3%. Procedure-related permanent morbidity and mortality rates were 3.2% and 0.8%, respectively. Follow-up catheter or MR angiography, which was available in 101 aneurysms at 6 - 15 months (mean, 7.7 months), revealed stable or improved occlusion in 95 aneurysms and worsening in 6 aneurysms (5.9%). Lower packing density (< 30%) remained the only predictor for anatomical worsening on multivariable logistic regression analysis (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
In this registry, Axium(TM) coils showed a relatively low rate of anatomical worsening on short-term follow-up imaging with an acceptable periprocedural safety profile compared to reports of other platinum coils. These results may warrant further study of long-term durability with Axium(TM) coils in larger populations.

Keyword

Aneurysm; Coiling; Endovascular treatment

MeSH Terms

Aneurysm
Angiography
Catheters
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Intracranial Aneurysm
Logistic Models
Neck
Platinum
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Platinum

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Detachment zone of Axium™ coil. The Axium™ coil rotates and bends in any direction at the detachment zone.

  • Fig. 2 Relationship between aneurysm volume and packing density.vol, volume; txmethod, treatment method

  • Fig. 3 Comparison of aneurysm packing densities according to coiling technique and aneurysm neck type.

  • Fig. 4 Comparison of mean packing densities between the improved/stable group (no recur) and the worsening group (recur) on follow-up imaging study (p < 0.05).

  • Fig. 5 Comparison of aneurysm volume between the improved/stable group and the worsening group on follow-up imaging study (p < 0.05).


Reference

1. Ishii A, Murayama Y, Nien YL, Yuki I, Adapon PH, Kim R, et al. Immediate and midterm outcomes of patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with Matrix1 and Matrix2 coils: a comparative analysis based on a single-center experience in 250 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery. 2008; 63:1071–1079. PMID: 19008767.
2. Niimi Y, Song J, Madrid M, Berenstein A. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using Matrix coils. Early experience and midterm follow-up. Stroke. 2006; 37:1028–1032. PMID: 16514098.
3. Cloft HJ. HEAL investigators. HydroCoil for endovascular aneurysm occlusion (HEAL) study: 3-6 months angiographic follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28:152–154. PMID: 17213446.
4. van Rooij WJ, de Gast AN, Sluzewski M. Results of 101 aneurysms treated with polyglycolic/polylactic acid microfilament Nexus coils compared with historical controls treated with standard coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008; 29:991–996. PMID: 18310232.
Article
5. Ferns SP, Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ, Rinkel GJ, van Rijn JC, Bipat S, et al. Coiling of intracranial aneurysms; a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke. 2009; 40:e523–e529. PMID: 19520984.
6. Slob MJ, Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ. The relation between packing and reopening in coiled intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study. Neuroradiology. 2005; 47:942–945. PMID: 16136261.
Article
7. Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ, Slob MJ, Bescos JO, Slump CH, Wijnalda D. Relation between aneurysm volume, packing, and compaction in 145 cerebral aneurysms treated with coils. Radiology. 2004; 231:653–658. PMID: 15118115.
Article
8. Tamatani S, Ito Y, Abe H, Koike T, Takeuchi S, Tanaka R. Evaluation of the stability of aneurysms after embolization using detachable coils: correlation between stability of aneurysms and embolized volume of aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002; 23:762–767. PMID: 12006273.
9. Roy D, Milot G, Raymond J. Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke. 2001; 32:1998–2004. PMID: 11546888.
Article
10. Slob MJ, van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M. Coil thickness and packing of cerebral aneurysms: a comparative study of two types of coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004; 26:901–903. PMID: 15814941.
11. Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ. Packing performance of helical Guglielmi detachable coil (GDC) 18 in intracranial aneurysms: a comparison with helical GDC 10 coils and complex Trufill/Orbit coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28:1384–1387. PMID: 17698547.
Article
Full Text Links
  • NI
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr