Korean Circ J.  2010 Nov;40(11):587-592. 10.4070/kcj.2010.40.11.587.

Normal Ranges and Physiological Changes of Midwall Fractional Shortening in Healthy Korean Population

• Park K
• Chang SA
• Kim HK
• Park HE
• Na SH
• Kim YJ
• Sohn DW
• Oh BH
• Park YB

• KMID: 1826178
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2010.40.11.587

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Left ventricular (LV) midwall fractional shortening (FSmw) reflects systolic function more accurately than LV endocardial fractional shortening (eFS) in patients with increased LV wall thickness. Although the normal reference ranges of LV-FSmw have been suggested in Western population studies, its reference values and age-related physiological changes in Eastern populations remain unknown.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Conventional echocardiographic parameters, LV-FSmw, and stress-corrected LV-FSmw were assessed in 160 healthy and clinically normal subjects with a mean age of 45 (range, 11-72 years; 104 males, 56 women), all of whom were confirmed to be free of disease, based on laboratory investigations, clinical and physical examination findings and computed tomographic coronary angiographic examinations.
RESULTS
LV-FSmw was higher in women compared to men. However, the differences were without statistical significance (18.2+/-1.5% for male gender and 19.4+/-2.5% for female gender, p=0.07). In contrast to LV-eFS that progressively increased with age (p=0.001), LV-FSmw and stress-corrected LV-FSmw was not influenced by changes in age (p=0.88 and 0.29, respectively). The results remained unchanged when analyses were performed adjusting for gender.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study provide normal reference values for LV-FSmw and stress-corrected LV-FSmw and their natural physiological changes with advancing age. These measures can be used as reference standards for research on LV systolic function in the setting of pressure or volume overload.

Keyword

Echocardiography; Left ventricular function; Systole

MeSH Terms

Echocardiography
Female
Humans
Male
Physical Examination
Reference Values
Systole
Ventricular Function, Left

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Schematic representation of two shell geometry model of midwall. Hd: diastolic thickness of shell, Hs: systolic thickness of shell.

Reference

1. Quiñones MA, Greenberg BH, Kopelen HA, et al. Echocardiographic predictors of clinical outcome in patients with left ventricular dysfunction enrolled in the SOLVD registry and trials: significance of left ventricular hypertrophy. Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000. 35:1237–1244.

2. Sohn JW, Shin DG, Kim DH, et al. Non-invasive parameters, including a low left ventricular ejection fraction, for predicting sudden cardiac death in Korean post myocardial infarction patients. Korean Circ J. 2006. 36:431–436.

3. Shimizu G, Hirota Y, Kita Y, Kawamura K, Saito T, Gaasch WH. Left ventricular midwall mechanics in systemic arterial hypertension: myocardial function is depressed in pressure-overload hypertrophy. Circulation. 1991. 83:1676–1684.

4. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1990. 322:1561–1566.

5. Mayet J, Ariff B, Wasan B, et al. Midwall myocardial shortening in athletic left ventricular hypertrophy. Int J Cardiol. 2002. 86:233–238.

6. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function by the midwall fractional shortening/end systolic stress relation in human hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994. 23:1444–1451.

7. Aurigemma GP, Gaasch WH, McLaughlin M, McGinn R, Sweeney A, Meyer TE. Reduced left ventricular systolic pump performance and depressed myocardial contractile function in patients > 65 years of age with normal ejection fraction and a high relative wall thickness. Am J Cardiol. 1995. 76:702–705.

8. Calabrò R, Pisacane C, Pacileo G, Russo MG. Left ventricular midwall mechanics in healthy children and adolescents. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999. 12:932–940.

9. Slotwiner DJ, Devereux RB, Schwartz JE, et al. Relation of age to left ventricular function in clinically normal adults. Am J Cardiol. 1998. 82:621–626.

10. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American society of echocardiography's guideline and standards committee and the chamber quantification writing group, developed in conjunction with the European association of echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005. 18:1440–1463.

11. Devereux RB, Reichek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man: anatomic validation of the method. Circulation. 1977. 55:613–618.

12. de Simone G, Daniels SR, Devereux RB, et al. Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992. 20:1251–1260.

13. Shimizu G, Conrad CH, Gaasch WH. Phase-plane analysis of left ventricular chamber filling and midwall fiber lengthening in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation. 1987. 75:1 Pt 2. I34–I39.

14. Yip GW, Shang Q, Tam LS, et al. Disease chronicity and activity predict subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Heart. 2009. 95:980–987.

15. de Simone G, Kimball TR, Roman MJ, et al. Relation of left ventricular chamber and midwall function to age in normal children, adolescents and adults. Ital Heart J. 2000. 1:295–300.

16. Park SW. Multicenter trial for estimation of normal values of echocardiograhic indices in Korea. Korean Circ J. 2000. 30:373–382.

17. Choi SH, Ha JW, Chang BC, et al. Long-term outcome of clinically insignificant aortic valve disease in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery for rheumatic heart disease. Korean Circ J. 2001. 31:1034–1041.

18. Corti R, Binggeli C, Turina M, Jenni R, Luscher TF, Turina J. Predictors of long-term survival after valve replacement for chronic aortic regurgitation: is M-mode echocardiography sufficient? Eur Heart J. 2001. 22:866–873.

19. Wandt B, Bojö L, Tolagen K, Wranne B. Echocardiographic assessment of ejection fraction in left ventricular hypertrophy. Heart. 1999. 82:192–198.

20. Seo JC, Lee MS, Chae CS, et al. Relation of hemodynamic load to left ventricular hypertrophy and performance in essential hypertension. Korean Circ J. 1993. 23:380–389.

21. Palmon LC, Reichek N, Yeon SB, et al. Intramural myocardial shortening in hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy with normal pump function. Circulation. 1994. 89:122–131.

22. Rademakers FE, Rogers WJ, Guier WH, et al. Relation of regional cross-fiber shortening to wall thickening in the intact heart: three-dimensional strain analysis by NMR tagging. Circulation. 1994. 89:1174–1182.

23. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Koren MJ, Mensah GA, Casale PN, Laragh JH. Midwall left ventricular mechanics: an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk in arterial hypertension. Circulation. 1996. 93:259–265.

24. Devereux RB, de Simone G, Pickering TG, Schwartz JE, Roman MJ. Relation of left ventricular midwall function to cardiovascular risk factors and arterial structure and function. Hypertension. 1998. 31:929–936.

25. Aurigemma GP, Gottdiener JS, Shemanski L, Gardin J, Kitzman D. Predictive value of systolic and diastolic function for incident congestive heart failure in the elderly: the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001. 37:1042–1048.

26. Schussheim AE, Diamond JA, Jhang JS, Phillips RA. Midwall fractional shortening is an independent predictor of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in asymptomatic patients with systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1998. 82:1056–1059.