J Gynecol Oncol.  2014 Jan;25(1):9-13. 10.3802/jgo.2014.25.1.9.

Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jhnam@amc.seoul.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to estimate the reproductive outcome of young women with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent fertility-sparing laparoscopic radical trachelectomy (LRT).
METHODS
We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of patients with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent LRT. Clinicopathological data were obtained from patient medical records, and reproductive outcome data were obtained from patient medical records and telephone interviews.
RESULTS
Fifty-five patients who underwent successful LRT were included in this study. The median age of patients was 32 years (range, 22 to 40 years), and the median follow-up time after LRT was 37 months (range, 3 to 105 months). Menstruation resumed in all patients after LRT, with fifty patients (90.9%) and five patients (9.1%) reporting regular and irregular menstruation, respectively. Six patients (10.9%) presented with cervical stenosis, which was manifested by regular but decreased menstrual flow and newly-developed dysmenorrhea. These patients underwent cervical cannulation and dilatation. Eighteen patients (32.7%) attempted to conceive, with six out of 18 patients receiving fertility treatments. Fourteen pregnancies (i.e., four missed abortions, six preterm births and four full-term births) occurred in 10 patients after LRT. Nine out of 10 patients gave birth to 10 healthy babies. The pregnancy rate after LRT was 55.6% (10/18). The spontaneous abortion rate and live birth rate were 28.6% (4/14) and 71.4% (10/14), respectively. The preterm birth rate was 60% (6/10).
CONCLUSION
Pregnancy and live birth rates after LRT were promising; however, the preterm birth rate was relatively high. Cervical stenosis also occurred in a small percentage of patients.

Keyword

Cervical cancer; Fertility; Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy; Pregnancy outcome; Reproductive outcome

MeSH Terms

Abortion, Missed
Abortion, Spontaneous
Catheterization
Constriction, Pathologic
Dilatation
Dysmenorrhea
Female
Fertility
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Live Birth
Medical Records
Menstruation
Parturition
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy Rate
Premature Birth
Retrospective Studies
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms*

Cited by  1 articles

Practical issues and research trends of oncofertility in gynecologic cancer
Jeong-Yeol Park
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2021;27(2):64-68.    doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2021.05.31.


Reference

1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011; 61:69–90.
2. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Seo HG, Lee JS. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in 2010. Cancer Res Treat. 2013; 45:1–14.
3. Lee YH, Choi KS, Lee HY, Jun JK. Current status of the National Cancer Screening Program for cervical cancer in Korea, 2009. J Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 23:16–21.
4. Lee HP. Annual report of gynecologic cancer registry program in Korea: 1991~2004. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 51:1411–1420.
5. Rob L, Skapa P, Robova H. Fertility-sparing surgery in patients with cervical cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12:192–200.
6. Plante M, Gregoire J, Renaud MC, Roy M. The vaginal radical trachelectomy: an update of a series of 125 cases and 106 pregnancies. Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 121:290–297.
7. Pareja R, Rendon GJ, Sanz-Lomana CM, Monzon O, Ramirez PT. Surgical, oncological, and obstetrical outcomes after abdominal radical trachelectomy: a systematic literature review. Gynecol Oncol. 2013; 131:77–82.
8. Chang SJ, Ryu HS, Nam JH. Uterine artery-preserving laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for early cervical cancer: technical aspects. Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 126:277–278.
9. Kim JH, Park JY, Kim DY, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH. Fertility-sparing laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for young women with early stage cervical cancer. BJOG. 2010; 117:340–347.
10. Nishio H, Fujii T, Sugiyama J, Kuji N, Tanaka M, Hamatani T, et al. Reproductive and obstetric outcomes after radical abdominal trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in a series of 31 pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28:1793–1798.
11. Pomel C, Castaigne D, Atallah D, Lauratet B, Camatte S, Morice P, et al. Laparoscopic (type III Piver like) radical trachelectomy [abstract]. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2002; 28:302.
12. Lee CL, Huang KG, Wang CJ, Yen CF, Lai CH. Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for stage Ib1 cervical cancer. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003; 10:111–115.
13. Cibula D, Ungar L, Palfalvi L, Bino B, Kuzel D. Laparoscopic abdominal radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 97:707–709.
14. Bafghi A, Castaigne D, Pomel C. Radical trachelectomy: from the laparoscopic approach to the vaginal route. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2006; 35:696–701.
15. Martin A, Torrent A. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical trachelectomy: surgical technique and outcome. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010; 17:37–41.
16. Wang YF, Chen GW, Li WS, Weng HN, Lu XG. Total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy with ascending branches of uterine arteries preservation. Chin Med J (Engl). 2011; 124:469–471.
17. Hong DG, Lee YS, Park NY, Chong GO, Park IS, Cho YL. Robotic uterine artery preservation and nerve-sparing radical trachelectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011; 21:391–396.
18. Rendon GJ, Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Schmeler KM, Pareja R. Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. JSLS. 2012; 16:503–507.
19. Lu Q, Zhang Y, Liu C, Wang S, Guo S, Zhang Z. Total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy in the treatment of early squamous cell cervical cancer: a retrospective study with 8-year follow-up. Gynecol Oncol. 2013; 130:275–279.
20. Shepherd JH, Spencer C, Herod J, Ind TE. Radical vaginal trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing procedure in women with early-stage cervical cancer-cumulative pregnancy rate in a series of 123 women. BJOG. 2006; 113:719–724.
21. Plante M. Evolution in fertility-preserving options for early-stage cervical cancer: radical trachelectomy, simple trachelectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013; 23:982–989.
22. Regan L, Braude PR, Trembath PL. Influence of past reproductive performance on risk of spontaneous abortion. BMJ. 1989; 299:541–545.
23. Preterm birth. In : Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC, Hauth JC, Wenstrom KD, editors. Williams obstetrics. 21st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill;2001. p. 689–727.
24. Svare JA, Andersen LF, Langhoff-Roos J, Jensen ET, Bruun B, Lind I, et al. The relationship between prior cervical conization, cervical microbial colonization and preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1992; 47:41–45.
25. Selo-Ojeme DO, Ind T, Shepherd JH. Isthmic stenosis following radical trachelectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002; 22:327–328.
26. Palaia I, Perniola G, Arrivi C, Sansone M, Pastore M, Calcagno M, et al. Persistent posttrachelectomy cervical stenosis treated with Petit-Le Four pessary in early cervical cancer patients: a report of two cases. Fertil Steril. 2007; 88:1677.e5–1677.e7.
Full Text Links
  • JGO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr