1. Landi B, Palazzo L. The role of endosonography in submucosal tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009; 23:679–701. PMID:
19744633.
Article
2. Kim EY. Diagnosis of subepithelial lesion: still "tissue is the issue". Clin Endosc. 2013; 46:313–314. PMID:
23964325.
Article
3. Moon JS. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in submucosal lesion. Clin Endosc. 2012; 45:117–123. PMID:
22866250.
Article
4. Cağlar E, Hatemi I, Atasoy D, Sişman G, Sentürk H. Concordance of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration diagnosis with the final diagnosis in subepithelial lesions. Clin Endosc. 2013; 46:379–383. PMID:
23964335.
Article
5. Kim EY. Introduction: value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Clin Endosc. 2012; 45:115–116. PMID:
22866249.
Article
6. Lee JH, Choi KD, Kim MY, et al. Clinical impact of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy results on decision making for patients with gastric subepithelial tumors >/= 2 cm in diameter. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74:1010–1018. PMID:
21889136.
7. Na HK, Lee JH, Park YS, et al. Yields and utility of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided 19-gauge Trucut biopsy versus 22-gauge fine needle aspiration for diagnosing gastric subepithelial tumors. Clin Endosc. 2015; 48:152–157.
Article
8. Kim EY. Fine-needle biopsy: should this be the first choice in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition? Clin Endosc. 2014; 47:425–428. PMID:
25325002.
Article
9. Yasuda I, Goto N, Tsurumi H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorders: feasibility of immunohistological, flow cytometric, and cytogenetic assessments. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012; 107:397–404. PMID:
21989147.
Article
10. Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Doi S, et al. Use of samples from endoscopic ultrasound-guided 19-gauge fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 10:316–322. PMID:
22019795.
Article
11. Mekky MA, Yamao K, Sawaki A, et al. Diagnostic utility of EUS-guided FNA in patients with gastric submucosal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71:913–919. PMID:
20226456.
Article
12. Fernández-Esparrach G, Sendino O, Solé M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and trucut biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors: a randomized crossover study. Endoscopy. 2010; 42:292–299. PMID:
20354939.
Article
13. DeWitt J, Emerson RE, Sherman S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided Trucut biopsy of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25:2192–2202. PMID:
21184105.
Article
14. Săftoiu A, Vilmann P, Guldhammer Skov B, Georgescu CV. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided Trucut biopsy adds significant information to EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration in selected patients: a prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007; 42:117–125. PMID:
17190771.
Article
15. Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S. Assessment of the technical performance of the flexible 19-gauge EUS-FNA needle. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 76:336–343. PMID:
22817786.
Article
16. Kaffes AJ, Chen RY, Tam W, et al. A prospective multicenter evaluation of a new side-port endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration in solid upper gastrointestinal lesions. Dig Endosc. 2012; 24:448–451. PMID:
23078438.
Article
17. Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Larghi A, et al. Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73:1189–1196. PMID:
21420083.
Article
18. Kim GH, Cho YK, Kim EY, et al. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014; 49:347–354. PMID:
24325591.
Article
19. Webb K, Hwang JH. Endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration versus core biopsy for the diagnosis of subepithelial tumors. Clin Endosc. 2013; 46:441–444. PMID:
24143299.
Article
20. Lachter J. Basic technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for solid lesions: what needle is the best? Endosc Ultrasound. 2014; 3:46–53. PMID:
24949410.
Article