Yonsei Med J.  2013 Nov;54(6):1471-1477. 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.6.1471.

Single-Fulcrum Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Uncomplicated Gallbladder Diseases: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis with Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Pancreaticobiliary Cancer Clinic, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea. cmkang@yuhs.ac

Abstract

PURPOSE
Single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SFLC) is a variant type of single incision and multi-port technique that does not use specialized one-port devices or articulating instruments. We retrospectively compared perioperative outcomes of SFLC with those of conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Between March 2009 and December 2010, SFLC was performed in 130 patients. Among them, 105 patients with uncomplicated gallbladder disease (no inflammation or no clinical symptoms) and another 105 patients who underwent CLC were selected for this study.
RESULTS
There was no open conversion. In comparison with CLC, SFLC was performed more often in young (46.4+/-12.2 years vs. 52.5+/-13.6 years, p=0.001) female patients (80/25 vs. 62/43, p=0.008). The total operation time was longer in SFLC (56.7+/-14.1 min vs. 47.5+/-17.1 min, p<0.001), but pain scores immediately after operation and at discharge time were lower for SFLC than for CLC (3.1+/-1.3 vs. 4.0+/-1.9, p<0.001, 2.0+/-0.9 vs. 2.4+/-0.8, p=0.002). Total cost was lower for SFLC than for CLC (US $ 1801+/-289.9 vs. US $ 2003+/-617.4, p=0.004). There were no differences in hospital stay or complication rates.
CONCLUSION
SFLC showed greater technical feasibility and cost benefits in treating uncomplicated benign gallbladder disease than CLC.

Keyword

Laparoscopic; cholecystectomy; single incision; single port

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/economics/*statistics & numerical data
Female
Gallbladder Diseases/economics/*surgery
Humans
Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Conventional trocars (2 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm trocars) are used for single fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy, rather than a specialized one-port system.

  • Fig. 2 Principle of action mechanism via a single fulcrum. Actual external (A) and internal (B) views and schematic features (C) during the dissection of the anterior aspect of Calot's triangle: the 2 mm grasper in the right hand was pulled at the right lateral side. The infundibulum of the GB was retracted on the right side and the anterior aspect of Calot's triangle was exposed and dissected by a 5 mm hook coagulator in the left hand. Actual external (D) and internal (E) views and schematic features (F) during the dissection of posterior Calot's triangle: the 2 mm grasper in the left hand was pulled to the left side. The infundibulum of GB was then retracted at the left side. The posterior aspect of Calot's triangle was exposed and dissected by a 5 mm hook coagulator in the right hand. An "X" was made by the 2 mm grasper and 5 mm hook coagulator at the trocar insertion site (C and F). GB, gall bladder.

  • Fig. 3 Change in operation time with SFLC. The gray diagram depicts total operative time (skin-to-skin). The black diagram is the actual cholecystectomy time (from starting dissection to detaching gallbladder from liver bed). The estimated learning curve was fitted and defined as y=90.31x-0.13, with R (range)2=0.261. The dotted-line is the moving average for every 10 cases of total operation time. We see that both the estimated learning curve and moving average in total operation time decreased as experience was accumulated. SFLC, single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy.


Cited by  2 articles

Technical feasibility of da Vinci SP single-port robotic cholecystectomy: a case report
Charles Jimenez Cruz, Hye Yeon Yang, Incheon Kang, Chang Moo Kang, Woo Jung Lee
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019;97(4):217-221.    doi: 10.4174/astr.2019.97.4.217.

The First Experiences of Robotic Single-Site Cholecystectomy in Asia: A Potential Way to Expand Minimally-Invasive Single-Site Surgery?
Sung Hwan Lee, Myung Jae Jung, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Chang Moo Kang, Woo Jung Lee
Yonsei Med J. 2015;56(1):189-195.    doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.1.189.


Reference

1. Majeed AW, Troy G, Nicholl JP, Smythe A, Reed MW, Stoddard CJ, et al. Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy. Lancet. 1996; 347:989–994.
Article
2. Choi SH, Hwang HK, Kang CM, Lee WJ. Single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-incision and multi-port technique. ANZ J Surg. 2012; 82:529–534.
Article
3. Qiu Z, Sun J, Pu Y, Jiang T, Cao J, Wu W. Learning curve of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILS): a preliminary study of 80 selected patients with benign gallbladder diseases. World J Surg. 2011; 35:2092–2101.
Article
4. Han HJ, Choi SB, Kim WB, Choi SY. Single-incision multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: things to overcome. Arch Surg. 2011; 146:68–73.
Article
5. Hayashi M, Asakuma M, Komeda K, Miyamoto Y, Hirokawa F, Tanigawa N. Effectiveness of a surgical glove port for single port surgery. World J Surg. 2010; 34:2487–2489.
Article
6. Elsey JK, Feliciano DV. Initial experience with single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210:620–624.
Article
7. Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc. 2009; 23:896–899.
Article
8. Elazary R, Khalaileh A, Zamir G, Har-Lev M, Almogy G, Rivkind AI, et al. Single-trocar cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope and articulating laparoscopic instruments: a bridge to NOTES or the final form? Surg Endosc. 2009; 23:969–972.
Article
9. Binenbaum SJ, Teixeira JA, Forrester GJ, Harvey EJ, Afthinos J, Kim GJ, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope. Arch Surg. 2009; 144:734–738.
Article
10. Afthinos JN, Forrester GJ, Binenbaum SJ, Harvey EJ, Kim GJ, Teixeira JA. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using flexible endoscopy: saline infiltration gallbladder fossa dissection technique. Surg Endosc. 2009; 23:2610–2614.
Article
11. Erbella J Jr, Bunch GM. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the first 100 outpatients. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24:1958–1961.
Article
12. Shussman N, Schlager A, Elazary R, Khalaileh A, Keidar A, Talamini M, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: lessons learned for success. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25:404–407.
Article
13. Khambaty F, Brody F, Vaziri K, Edwards C. Laparoscopic versus single-incision cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 2011; 35:967–972.
Article
14. McGregor CG, Sodergren MH, Aslanyan A, Wright VJ, Purkayastha S, Darzi A, et al. Evaluating systemic stress response in single port vs. multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011; 15:614–622.
Article
15. Prasad A, Mukherjee KA, Kaul S, Kaur M. Postoperative pain after cholecystectomy: conventional laparoscopy versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery. J Minim Access Surg. 2011; 7:24–27.
Article
16. Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, Farantos C, Benetatos N, Mavridou P, et al. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24:1842–1848.
Article
17. Chang SK, Tay CW, Bicol RA, Lee YY, Madhavan K. A case-control study of single-incision versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg. 2011; 35:289–293.
Article
18. Cantore F, Colombo EM, Giuseppe MD, Biondi A, Rausei S, Dionigi G, et al. Single access cholecystectomy using standard laparoscopic instruments. Updates Surg. 2011; 63:31–34.
Article
19. Philipp SR, Miedema BW, Thaler K. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments: early experience in comparison with the gold standard. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 209:632–637.
Article
20. Love KM, Durham CA, Meara MP, Mays AC, Bower CE. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cost comparison. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25:1553–1558.
Article
21. Chow A, Purkayastha S, Aziz O, Pefanis D, Paraskeva P. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparison with 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 2010; 145:1187–1191.
Article
22. Wu SD, Han JY, Tian Y. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011; 21:25–28.
Article
23. Fronza JS, Linn JG, Nagle AP, Soper NJ. A single institution's experience with single incision cholecystectomy compared to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery. 2010; 148:731–734.
Article
24. Ersin S, Firat O, Sozbilen M. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it more than a challenge? Surg Endosc. 2010; 24:68–71.
Article
25. Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25:367–377.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr