J Korean Med Sci.  2014 Jun;29(6):764-770. 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.6.764.

An Early Stage Evaluation of the Supporting Program for Obstetric Care Underserved Areas in Korea

• Na BJ
• Kim HJ
• Lee JY

• KMID: 1796936
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2014.29.6.764

Abstract

"The Supporting Program for Obstetric Care Underserved Areas (SPOU)" provides financial aids to rural community (or district) hospitals to reopen prenatal care and delivery services for regions without obstetrics and gynecology clinics or hospitals. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early stage effect of the SPOU program. The proportion of the number of birth through SPOU was calculated by each region. Also survey was conducted to investigate the extent of overall satisfaction, elements of dissatisfaction, and suggestions for improvement of the program; 209 subjects participated from 7 to 12 December, 2012. Overall, 20% of pregnant women in Youngdong (71 cases) and Gangjin (106 cases) used their community (or district) hospitals through the SPOU whereas Yecheon (23 cases) was 8%; their satisfaction rates were high. Short distance and easy accessibility was the main reason among women choosing community (or district) hospital whereas the reasons of not selecting the community (or district) hospital were favor of the outside hospital's facility, system, and trust in the medical staffs. The SPOU seems to be currently effective at an early stage. However, to successfully implement this program, the government should make continuous efforts to recruit highly qualified medical staffs and improve medical facility and equipment.

Keyword

Medically Underserved Area; Prenatal Care; Delivery, Obstetric; Hospitals, Community; Financing, Government

MeSH Terms

Adult
Delivery, Obstetric/economics/*utilization
Female
Hospitals
Humans
Pregnancy
Prenatal Care/economics
*Program Evaluation
Republic of Korea
Rural Population

Reference

1. Getahun D, Ananth CV, Kinzler WL. Risk factors for antepartum and intrapartum stillbirth: a population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196:499–507.

2. Fisher ES, LoGerfo JP, Daling JR. Prenatal care and pregnancy outcomes during the recession: the Washington State experience. Am J Public Health. 1985; 75:866–869.

3. Nesbitt TS, Connell FA, Hart LG, Rosenblatt RA. Access to obstetric care in rural areas: effect on birth outcomes. Am J Public Health. 1990; 80:814–818.

4. Nesbitt TS, Larson EH, Rosenblatt RA, Hart LG. Access to maternity care in rural Washington: its effect on neonatal outcomes and resource use. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87:85–90.

5. Ministry of Health and Welfare and Konyang University. The evaluation study of supporting policy for underserved area of obstetric care. Seoul: MOHW;2012. accessed on 23 April 2014. Available at http://www.prism.go.kr/homepage/researchCommon/retrieveResearchDetailPopup.do?research_id=1351000-201300012.

6. Ministry of Health and Welfare. The guidance of government supporting project for underserved area in obstetric care. Seoul: MOHW;2013. accessed on 23 April 2014. Available at http://www.google.co.kr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CCkQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdownload.mw.go.kr%2Ffront_new%2Fmodules%2Fdownload.jsp%3FBOARD_ID%3D110%26CONT_SEQ%3D291233%26FILE_SEQ%3D139614&ei=0HRXU7L_BYOj8AXpxIH4Bw&usg=AFQjCNHTDNNitijUvbcDf6pU9kEvXcCe3w&bvm=bv.65177938,d.dGc&cad=rjt.

7. Ministry of Health and Welfare. The second basic plan for low fertility and aging society <medical support for obstetric care underserved areas>. 2013. accessed on 23 April 2014. Available at http://www.mw.go.kr/front_new/jb/sjb030301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=03&MENU_ID=031601&page=1&CONT_SEQ=286292.

8. Showstack JA, Budetti PP, Minkler D. Factors associated with birthweight: an exploration of the roles of prenatal care and length of gestation. Am J Public Health. 1984; 74:1003–1008.

9. Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Scorza WE, Knuppel RA. Prenatal care and black-white fetal death disparity in the United States: heterogeneity by high-risk conditions. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99:483–489.

10. Stephansson O, Dickman PW, Johansson AL, Cnattingius S. The influence of socioeconomic status on stillbirth risk in Sweden. Int J Epidemiol. 2001; 30:1296–1301.

11. Alessandri LM, Stanley FJ, Newnham J, Walters BN. The epidemiological characteristics of unexplained antepartum stillbirths. Early Hum Dev. 1992; 30:147–161.

12. Conde-Agudelo A, Belizán JM, Díaz-Rossello JL. Epidemiology of fetal death in Latin America. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000; 79:371–378.

13. Lowery C, Bronstein J, McGhee J, Ott R, Reece EA, Mays GP. ANGELS and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences paradigm for distant obstetrical care delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196:534.e1–534.e9.

14. Reece EA, Leguizamon G, Silva J, Whiteman V, Smith D. Intensive interventional maternity care reduces infant morbidity and hospital costs. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002; 11:204–210.

15. Brown SS. Can low birth weight be prevented? Fam Plann Perspect. 1985; 17:112–118.

16. Craig M, Nichols A, Price D. Education for the management of obstetric conditions in rural general practice: a curriculum statement for a major in obstetric studies in the Rural Training Programme of the Faculty of Rural Medicine, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993; 33:230–239.

17. Song SY. No OBGY clinic for pregnant women: Korea healthlog. accessed on 2 March 2014. Available at http://www.koreahealthlog.com/news/newsview.php?newscd=2009102300009.

18. Yu SH, Jung SH, Cheon BY, Shn TY, Oh HJ. Geographical distribution of physician manpower by specialty and care level. Korean J Prev Med. 1993; 26:661–671.

19. Gortmaker SL. The effects of prenatal care upon the health of the newborn. Am J Public Health. 1979; 69:653–660.

20. Song SY. Community hospitals participating SPOU "worsening financial difficulties" rapportian. accessed on 2 March 2014. Available at http://www.rapportian.com/n_news/news/view.html?no=4689.