J Korean Med Sci.  2013 Aug;28(8):1117-1119. 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.8.1117.

Choosing the Target Journal: Do Authors Need a Comprehensive Approach?

Affiliations
  • 1Departments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (A Teaching Trust of the University of Birmingham, UK), Russells Hall Hospital, West Midlands, UK. a.gasparyan@gmail.com

Abstract

No abstract available.


MeSH Terms

Authorship
Humans
Journal Impact Factor
Peer Review, Research
Publishing/*trends
Socioeconomic Factors

Cited by  5 articles

Reporting Survey Based Studies – a Primer for Authors
Prithvi Sanjeevkumar Gaur, Olena Zimba, Vikas Agarwal, Latika Gupta
J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35(45):e398.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e398.

Fostering Strategic Changes in Publishing: Journal of Korean Medical Science in 2018
Sung-Tae Hong
J Korean Med Sci. 2018;33(1):.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e8.

Ethical Reviewers are Essential for Scholarly Journals for Timely Processing of Submissions and Avoiding Retractions
Mina Mehregan
J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34(5):.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e41.

Improving Scientific Writing Skills and Publishing Capacity by Developing University-Based Editing System and Writing Programs
Edward Barroga, Hiroshi Mitoma
J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34(1):.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e9.

Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools
Armen Yuri Gasparyan, Marlen Yessirkepov, Alexander A. Voronov, Anna M. Koroleva, George D. Kitas
J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34(27):.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e184.


Reference

2. Frank E. Authors' criteria for selecting journals. JAMA. 1994; 272:163–164.
3. Søreide K, Winter DC. Global survey of factors influencing choice of surgical journal for manuscript submission. Surgery. 2010; 147:475–480.
4. Özçakar L, Franchignoni F, Kara M, Muñoz Lasa S. Choosing a scholarly journal during manuscript submission: the way how it rings true for physiatrists. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012; 48:643–647.
5. Bornmann L, Marx W, Gasparyan AY, Kitas GD. Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics. Rheumatol Int. 2012; 32:1861–1867.
6. San Francisco Declaration on Research Integrity. accessed on 1 June 2013. Available at http://www.ascb.org/SFdeclaration.html.
7. EASE statement on inappropriate use of impact factors. Eur Sci Ed. 2007; 33:99–100.
8. Gasparyan AY. Bibliographic databases: some critical points. J Korean Med Sci. 2013; 28:799–800.
9. Uysal S, Coker C. Scientific medical journals in Turkey: current state and goals. Eur Sci Ed. 2011; 37:109–110.
10. Massarrat S, Kolahdoozan S. Critical assessment of progress of medical sciences in Iran and Turkey: the way developing countries with limited resources should make effective contributions to the production of science. Arch Iran Med. 2011; 14:370–377.
11. Warlick SE, Vaughan KT. Factors influencing publication choice: why faculty choose open access. Biomed Digit Libr. 2007; 4:1.
12. Björk BC, Solomon D. Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact. BMC Med. 2012; 10:73.
13. Gasparyan AY. Get indexed and cited, or perish. Eur Sci Ed. 2011; 37:66.
14. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Kitas GD. Biomedical journal editing: elements of success. Croat Med J. 2011; 52:423–428.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr