J Korean Med Sci.  2014 Feb;29(2):281-286. 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.2.281.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Symptomatic Peripartum Diastasis of Pubic Symphysis

• Yoo JJ
• Ha YC
• Lee YK
• Hong JS
• Kang BJ
• Koo KH

• KMID: 1789989
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2014.29.2.281

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine incidence, associated risk factors, and clinical outcomes of a diastasis of pubic symphysis. Among 4,151 women, who delivered 4,554 babies at the Department of Obstetrics of Seoul National University Bundang hospital from January 2004 to December 2006, eleven women were diagnosed as having a symptomatic diastasis of pubic symphysis. We estimated the incidence of the diastasis and identified the associated risk factors. To evaluate the pain relief and reduction of diastasis we followed up the 11 diastatic patients. The incidence of the diastasis was 1/385. Primiparity (P = 0.010) and twin gestation (P = 0.016) appeared as risk factors for diastasis by univairable analysis; and twin gestation appeared to be the only risk factor (P = 0.006) by logistic analysis. Two patients were operated due to intractable pain; and the remaining nine patients were treated conservatively. The diastatic gap decreased to less than 1.5 cm by 2 to 6 weeks after the diagnosis and then remained stationary. At a mean follow-up of 22.1 months (range, 12 to 47 months), five of 11 patients had persistent symphysis pubis dysfunction. Diastasis is more frequent than generally acknowledged. Pregnant women with multiple gestations should be informed about the potential risk of pubic symphysis diastasis.

Keyword

Pubic Symphysis Diastasis; Prevalence; Risk Factors

MeSH Terms

Adolescent
Adult
Birth Weight
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gestational Age
Humans
Incidence
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Peripartum Period
Pregnancy
Pregnancy, Twin
Pubic Symphysis/radiography
Pubic Symphysis Diastasis/diagnosis/*epidemiology
Risk Factors
Young Adult

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Patient 1, a 32-yr-old woman, had a pubic pain after vaginal delivery of twin babies. (A) Her pelvic radiograph shows 4.6 cm separation of the pubic symphysis. (B) At 12-month follow-up, the separation gap decreased to 1.3 cm.

• 

  Fig. 2 Patient 6, a 32-yr-old woman, had a pubic pain after vaginal delivery of twin babies. (A) Her pelvic radiograph shows 5.6 cm separation of the pubic symphysis. She underwent an internal fixation using a plate and screws. (B) Pelvic radiograph at 15-month follow-up shows well-reduced pubic symphysis gap.

• 

  Fig. 3 Patient 11, a 37-yr-old woman, were diagnosed as having a diastasis of symphysis pubis. She complained a click and instability of symphysis pubis. (A) Her pelvic radiograph using fluoroscopy at 16-month follow-up shows a 1.3 cm separation of the pubic symphysis. (B) Under a lateral compression of pelvis, the separation decreased to 0.8 cm.

Reference

1. Crim MW, Moss SW. Pelvic diastasis in pregnancy. Am Fam Physician. 1987; 35:185–186.

2. Callahan JT. Separation of the symphysis pubis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1953; 66:281–293.

3. Moon WN, Han JY, Oh HJ, Suh SW. Diastasis of the symphysis pubis after delivery. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2001; 36:473–478.

4. Cibils LA. Rupture of the symphysis pubis: a case report. Obstet Gynecol. 1971; 38:407–410.

5. Braddon SA. Relaxin-dependent adenosine 6',5'-monophosphate concentration changes in the mouse pubic symphysis. Endocrinology. 1978; 102:1292–1299.

6. Culligan P, Hill S, Heit M. Rupture of the symphysis pubis during vaginal delivery followed by two subsequent uneventful pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 100:1114–1117.

7. Dhar S, Anderton JM. Rupture of the symphysis pubis during labor. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992; (283):252–257.

8. Ku SJ, Kim SB, Kim JH, Park HY, Kim HJ. Clinical analysis of the perinatal pubic bone separation. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 49:315–321.

9. Cowling PD, Rangan A. A case of postpartum pubic symphysis diastasis. Injury. 2010; 41:657–659.

10. Chang JL, Wu V. External fixation of pubic symphysis diastasis from postpartum trauma. Orthopedics. 2008; 31:493.

11. Chang D, Markman BS. Images in clinical medicine: spontaneous resolution of a pubic-symphysis diastasis. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346:39.

12. Reis RA, Baer JL, Arens RA, Stewart E. Traumatic separation of the symphysis pubis during spontaneous labor. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1932; 55:336–354.

13. Taylor RN, Sonson RD. Separation of the pubic symphysis: an underrecognized peripartum complication. J Reprod Med. 1986; 31:203–206.

14. Heath T, Gherman RB. Symphyseal separation, sacroiliac joint dislocation and transient lateral femoral cutaneous neuropathy associated with McRoberts' maneuver: a case report. J Reprod Med. 1999; 44:902–904.

15. Moon WN, Han JY. Radiographic appearance of the symphysis pubis: criteria of diastasis of symphysis pubis after normal delivery. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 1999; 34:969–972.

16. Hagen R. Pelvic girdle relaxation from an orthopaedic point of view. Acta Orthop Scand. 1974; 45:550–563.

17. Kharrazi FD, Rodgers WB, Kennedy JG, Lhowe DW. Parturition-induced pelvic dislocation: a report of four cases. J Orthop Trauma. 1997; 11:277–281.

18. Leadbetter RE, Mawer D, Lindow SW. Symphysis pubis dysfunction: a review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004; 16:349–354.

19. So YH, Park SG, Kal CW, Kim MJ, Lee JH, Kim YC. Separation of symphysis pubis during vaginal delivery - report of 5 cases. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 43:2310–2314.

20. Seth S, Das B, Salhan S. A severe case of pubic symphysis diastasis in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003; 106:230–232.