Clin Orthop Surg.  2014 Jun;6(2):165-172. 10.4055/cios.2014.6.2.165.

Results of Revision Surgery and Causes of Unstable Total Knee Arthroplasty

• Song IS
• Sun DH
• Chon JG
• Jang SW
• Sun DH

• KMID: 1784662
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2014.6.2.165

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to evaluate causes of unstable total knee arthroplasty and results of revision surgery.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed 24 knees that underwent a revision arthroplasty for unstable total knee arthroplasty. The average follow-up period was 33.8 months. We classified the instability and analyzed the treatment results according to its cause. Stress radiographs, postoperative component position, and joint level were measured. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score and range of motion.
RESULTS
Causes of instability included coronal instability with posteromedial polyethylene wear and lateral laxity in 13 knees, coronal instability with posteromedial polyethylene wear in 6 knees and coronal and sagittal instability in 3 knees including post breakage in 1 knee, global instability in 1 knee and flexion instability in 1 knee. Mean preoperative/postoperative varus and valgus angles were 5.8degrees/3.2degrees (p = 0.713) and 22.5degrees/5.6degrees (p = 0.032). Mean postoperative alpha, beta, gamma, delta angle were 5.34degrees, 89.65degrees, 2.74degrees, 6.77degrees. Mean changes of joint levels were from 14.1 mm to 13.6 mm from fibular head (p = 0.82). The mean HSS score improved from 53.4 to 89.2 (p = 0.04). The average range of motion was changed from 123degrees to 122degrees (p = 0.82).
CONCLUSIONS
Revision total knee arthroplasty with or without a more constrained prosthesis will be a definite solution for an unstable total knee arthroplasty. The solution according to cause is very important and seems to be helpful to avoid unnecessary over-constrained implant selection in revision surgery for total knee instability.

Keyword

Unstable total knee; Total knee instability; Revision arthroplasty

MeSH Terms

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/*adverse effects
Female
Humans
Joint Instability/*etiology
Knee Joint/*surgery
Knee Prosthesis
Male
Middle Aged
*Prosthesis Failure
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 (A) The radiograph shows coronal plane instability and varus deformity on both postoperative knees. (B) We found posteromedial bearing wear in the operative field. (C) We performed a revision total knee arthroplasty with femoral and tibial component change.

• 

  Fig. 2 Radiographs demonstrating sagittal plane instability (A) and coronal plane instability (B). We presumed posterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament attenuation. (C) We performed a revision arthroplasty with femoral component change.

• 

  Fig. 3 The right knee shows posterior instability (A) and valgus instability (B) suggesting coronal and sagittal instability. We found a post fracture of the polyethylene insert (C) and performed a revision surgery with femoral and tibial component change (D).

• 

  Fig. 4 The left knee showed global instability on radiography and clinical examination (A). We performed a revision arthroplasty on the left knee with femoral and tibial component change (B).

Reference

1. Ranawat CS, Flynn WF Jr, Deshmukh RG. Impact of modern technique on long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; (309):131–135.

2. Ahlberg A, Lunden A. Secondary operations after knee joint replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981; (156):170–174.

3. Thornhill TS, Dalziel RW, Sledge CB. Alternatives to arthrodesis for the failed total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982; (170):131–140.

4. Samuelson KM. Bone grafting and noncemented revision arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; (226):93–101.

5. Goldberg VM, Figgie MP, Figgie HE 3rd, Sobel M. The results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; (226):86–92.

6. Rand JA, Bryan RS. Revision after total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1982; 13(1):201–212.

7. Ochsner JL Jr, Kostman WC, Dodson M. Posterior dislocation of a posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a report of two cases. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1996; 25(4):310–312.

8. Insall JN, Dethmers DA. Revision of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982; (170):123–130.

9. Cameron HU, Hunter GA. Failure in total knee arthroplasty: mechanisms, revisions, and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982; (170):141–146.

10. McAuley JP, Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Treatment of the unstable total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2004; 53:237–241.

11. Ng TP, Chiu KY. Recurrent dislocation of total knee arthroplasty: an unusual cause. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18(8):1067–1070.

12. Erceg M, Maricevic A. Recurrent posterior dislocation following primary posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Croat Med J. 2000; 41(2):207–209.

13. Dawson-Bowling S, Tavakkolizadeh A, Cottam HL, Butler-Manuel PA. Multiple sclerosis and bilateral dislocations of total knee replacements: a case report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008; 16(2):148–151.

14. Villanueva M, Rios-Luna A, Pereiro J, Fahandez-Saddi H, Perez-Caballer A. Dislocation following total knee arthroplasty: a report of six cases. Indian J Orthop. 2010; 44(4):438–443.

15. Azzam K, Parvizi J, Kaufman D, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF, Austin MS. Revision of the unstable total knee arthroplasty: outcome predictors. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 26(8):1139–1144.

16. Bindelglass DF, Vince KG. Patellar tilt and subluxation following subvastus and parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: implication for surgical technique. J Arthroplasty. 1996; 11(5):507–511.

17. Hossain F, Patel S, Haddad FS. Midterm assessment of causes and results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(5):1221–1228.

18. Ochsner JL Jr, Kostman WC, Dodson M. Posterior dislocation of a posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a report of two cases. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1996; 25(4):310–312.

19. Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Vaughn BK, et al. Dislocation following primary posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1993; 8(6):633–639.

20. Mills HJ, McKee MD, Horne G, Waddell JP. Dislocation of posteriorly stabilized total knee arthroplasties. Can J Surg. 1994; 37(3):225–228.

21. Gebhard JS, Kilgus DJ. Dislocation of a posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: a report of two cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; (254):225–229.

22. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Booth RE Jr, Balderston RA, Rothman RH. Posterior dislocation of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992; (278):128–133.

23. Insall J, Scott WN, Ranawat CS. The total condylar knee prosthesis: a report of two hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979; 61(2):173–180.

24. Pritsch M, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Bryan RS. Surgical treatment of ligamentous instability after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1984; 102(3):154–158.

25. Bartel DL, Marshall JL, Schieck RA, Wang JB. Surgical repositioning of the medial collateral ligament: an anatomical and mechanical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977; 59(1):107–116.

26. Harwin SF. Revision total knee arthroplasty using the Kinemax Plus Superstabilizer prosthesis: minimum 10-year follow-up. Knee. 2006; 13(2):93–97.

27. Delp SL, Kocmond JH, Stern SH. Tradeoffs between motion and stability in posterior substituting knee arthroplasty design. J Biomech. 1995; 28(10):1155–1166.

28. Barrack RL. Evolution of the rotating hinge for complex total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (392):292–299.

29. Kim YH, Kim JS. Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(6):1440–1447.