J Korean Med Sci.  2013 Oct;28(10):1522-1528. 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.10.1522.

Improvement of Dementia Screening Accuracy of Mini-Mental State Examination by Education-Adjustment and Supplementation of Frontal Assessment Battery Performance

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neuropsychiatry, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea.
  • 2Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. selfpsy@snu.ac.kr
  • 3Interdisciplinary Program in Cognitive Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Neuropsychiatry, Daelim Saint Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Neuropsychiatry, Gyeonggi Provincial Hospital for the Elderly, Yongin, Korea.
  • 6Department of Neuropsychiatry, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea.
  • 7Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate whether the demographic variable-adjustment and supplementation of Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) score can improve the screening ability of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for dementia and its subtypes. Five hundred forty-one non-demented comparison (NC) and 474 dementia (320 Alzheimer's disease [AD]; 139 non-Alzheimer's disease dementia [NAD]; and 15 mixed AD-NAD dementia) individuals living in the community were included. Education-adjusted MMSE (MMSE-edu) score showed significantly better screening accuracy for overall dementia, AD, and NAD than MMSE raw score. FAB-supplemented MMSE (MMSE-FAB) score had significantly better screening ability for NAD, but not for overall dementia and AD, than MMSE raw score alone. Additional supplementation of FAB to MMSE-edu further increased the ability for overall dementia or NAD screening, but not for AD screening. Further education adjustment of MMSE-FAB also improved its ability for overall dementia, AD, and NAD screening. These results strongly support the usefulness of education-adjustment and supplementation of frontal function assessment to improve screening performance of MMSE for dementia and its subtypes, NAD in particular.

Keyword

Mini-Mental State Examination; Frontal Assessment Battery; Education; Dementia; Screening Accuracy

MeSH Terms

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alzheimer Disease/complications/diagnosis
Area Under Curve
Dementia/complications/*diagnosis
Demography
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neuropsychological Tests
ROC Curve

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Receiver operating characteristic curves of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), education-adjusted MMSE (MMSE-edu), FAB-supplemented MMSE (MMSE-FAB), and education-adjusted MMSE-FAB (MMSE-FAB-edu) in screening for (A) overall dementia, (B) Alzheimer's disease, and (C) non-Alzheimer's disease dementia.


Reference

1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975; 12:189–198.
2. Lee DY, Lee KU, Lee JH, Kim KW, Jhoo JH, Kim SY, Yoon JC, Woo SI, Ha J, Woo JI. A normative study of the CERAD neuropsychological assessment battery in the Korean elderly. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004; 10:72–81.
3. Anthony JC, LeResche L, Niaz U, von Korff MR, Folstein MF. Limits of the 'Mini-Mental State' as a screening test for dementia and delirium among hospital patients. Psychol Med. 1982; 12:397–408.
4. Jones RN, Gallo JJ. Education and sex differences in the mini-mental state examination: effects of differential item functioning. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002; 57:P548–P558.
5. O'Connor DW, Pollitt PA, Treasure FP, Brook CP, Reiss BB. The influence of education, social class and sex on Mini-Mental State scores. Psychol Med. 1989; 19:771–776.
6. Kim JL, Park JH, Kim BJ, Kim MD, Kim SK, Chi YK, Kim TH, Moon SW, Park MH, Bae JN, et al. Interactive influences of demographics on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the demographics-adjusted norms for MMSE in elderly Koreans. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012; 24:642–650.
7. Han C, Jo SA, Jo I, Kim E, Park MH, Kang Y. An adaptation of the Korean mini-mental state examination (K-MMSE) in elderly Koreans: demographic influence and population-based norms (the AGE study). Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2008; 47:302–310.
8. Lee DY, Lee KU, Lee JH, Kim KW, Jhoo JH, Youn JC, Kim SY, Woo SI, Woo JI. A normative study of the Mini-Mental State examination in the Korean elderly. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2002; 41:508–525.
9. Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992; 40:922–935.
10. Kittner SJ, White LR, Farmer ME, Wolz M, Kaplan E, Moes E, Brody JA, Feinleib M. Methodological issues in screening for dementia: the problem of education adjustment. J Chronic Dis. 1986; 39:163–170.
11. Kraemer HC, Moritz DJ, Yesavage J. Adjusting Mini-Mental State Examination scores for age and educational level to screen for dementia: correcting bias or reducing validity. Int Psychogeriatr. 1998; 10:43–51.
12. Royall DR, Mahurin R. EXIT, QED, and DSM-IV: very early Alzheimer's disease. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1994; 6:62–65.
13. Gleichgerrcht E, Roca M, Manes F, Torralva T. Comparing the clinical usefulness of the Institute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO) Frontal Screening (IFS) and the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) in frontotemporal dementia. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011; 33:997–1004.
14. Oguro H, Yamaguchi S, Abe S, Ishida Y, Bokura H, Kobayashi S. Differentiating Alzheimer's disease from subcortical vascular dementia with the FAB test. J Neurol. 2006; 253:1490–1494.
15. Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B. The FAB: a Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology. 2000; 55:1621–1626.
16. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Press;1994.
17. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology. 1984; 34:939–944.
18. Román GC, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntti T, Cummings JL, Masdeu JC, Garcia JH, Amaducci L, Orgogozo JM, Brun A, Hofman A, et al. Vascular dementia: diagnostic criteria for research studies: report of the NINDS-AIREN International Workshop. Neurology. 1993; 43:250–260.
19. McKeith IG, Dickson DW, Lowe J, Emre M, O'Brien JT, Feldman H, Cummings J, Duda JE, Lippa C, Perry EK, et al. Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: third report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology. 2005; 65:1863–1872.
20. Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, Passant U, Stuss D, Black S, Freedman M, Kertesz A, Robert PH, Albert M, et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 1998; 51:1546–1554.
21. Morris JC, Heyman A, Mohs RC, Hughes JP, van Belle G, Fillenbaum G, Mellits ED, Clark C. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD): part I. clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1989; 39:1159–1165.
22. Lee JH, Lee KU, Lee DY, Kim KW, Jhoo JH, Kim JH, Lee KH, Kim SY, Han SH, Woo JI. Development of the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Packet (CERAD-K): clinical and neuropsychological assessment batteries. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002; 57:P47–P53.
23. Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993; 43:2412–2414.
24. Kim TH, Huh Y, Choe JY, Jeong JW, Park JH, Lee SB, Lee JJ, Jhoo JH, Lee DY, Woo JI, et al. Korean version of frontal assessment battery: psychometric properties and normative data. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010; 29:363–370.
25. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983; 148:839–843.
26. Narasimhalu K, Lee J, Auchus AP, Chen CP. Improving detection of dementia in Asian patients with low education: combining the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008; 25:17–22.
27. Mackinnon A, Mulligan R. Combining cognitive testing and informant report to increase accuracy in screening for dementia. Am J Psychiatry. 1998; 155:1529–1535.
28. Knafelc R, Lo Giudice D, Harrigan S, Cook R, Flicker L, Mackinnon A, Ames D. The combination of cognitive testing and an informant questionnaire in screening for dementia. Age Ageing. 2003; 32:541–547.
29. Pozueta A, Rodríguez-Rodríguez E, Vazquez-Higuera JL, Mateo I, Sánchez-Juan P, González-Perez S, Berciano J, Combarros O. Detection of early Alzheimer's disease in MCI patients by the combination of MMSE and an episodic memory test. BMC Neurol. 2011; 11:78.
30. Lipton AM, Ohman KA, Womack KB, Hynan LS, Ninman ET, Lacritz LH. Subscores of the FAB differentiate frontotemporal lobar degeneration from AD. Neurology. 2005; 65:726–731.
31. Slachevsky A, Villalpando JM, Sarazin M, Hahn-Barma V, Pillon B, Dubois B. Frontal assessment battery and differential diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2004; 61:1104–1107.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr