Yonsei Med J.  2011 May;52(3):510-521. 10.3349/ymj.2011.52.3.510.

Willingness to Pay for Hospice Care Using the Contingent Valuation Method

• Kim MO
• Lee KS
• Kim JH
• Joo JS

• KMID: 1777025
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2011.52.3.510

Abstract

PURPOSE
It is necessary to develop a proper payment system for more health care facilities to provide hospice and palliative cares. In deciding the proper level of payment for hospice per diem fee, willingness to pay (WTP) may provide one of the critical information. This study was conducted to determine WTP for hospice care and to analyze those factors affecting WTP.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A contingent valuation method with a double-bounded dichotomous-choice model was used. Interview survey was organized and conducted by a survey company from April 4 to 18, 2008. The mean WTP was calculated through an infinite integration of survival functions.
RESULTS
The average willingness to pay was found to be 42,240 Korean won (KRW) (USD 35), with the amount becoming higher as hospice services were deemed more necessary or where average monthly household income was higher. The amount was also higher among male respondents than females.
CONCLUSION
To compare this WTP with actual cost (32,500 KRW) (USD 27) for hospice care. To facilitate hospice service, hospice specific payment system should be developed. This study provides information regarding the general public's preference of hospice service and their WTP for hospice care, and it may be useful in the decision-making process.

Keyword

Hospice; willingness to pay; Per diem payment

MeSH Terms

Fees and Charges
Female
Health Care Costs
Hospice Care/*economics/psychology
Humans
Male
*Public Opinion
Socioeconomic Factors

Reference

1. Korea National Statistical Office. 2008 Annual Report on the Cause of Death Statistics. 2009.

2. Brief Report on the Statistics of National Cancer Registry in 2009. Ministry of Health. Accessed 2010. 03. 05. Available at http://www.mohw.go.kr/.

3. Choi KS, You CH, Lee KH, Kim CY, Heo DS, Yun YH. Comparison of Medical Care Cost between Hospice Care and Conventional Care in the Last Year of life. Korean J Health Policy Adm. 2005. 15:1–15.

4. Yun YH, Heo DS, Jeon HY, Yoo TW, Kim YY, Huh BY. Behavior patterns of health care utilization in terminal cancer patients. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 1998. 19:445–451.

5. Zhang B, Wright AA, Huskamp HA, Nilsson ME, Maciejewski ML, Earle CC, et al. Health care costs in the last week of life: associations with end-of-life conversations. Arch Intern Med. 2009. 169:480–488.

6. Yun YH, Heo DS. Problems of terminal cancer patient's admission to a university hospital. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 1996. 17:294–304.

7. KS Lee, JS Joo, JH Kim, KY Kim. Current status and challenge of hospice palliative care in Korea. Korean J Hosp Palliat Care. 2008. 11:196–205.

8. Lee SW, Lee EO, Ahn HS, Heo DS, Kim DS, Kim HS, et al. Development in the National Hospice Care Service in Korea. Korean Nurse. 1997. 36:49–69.

9. Glass AP, Chen LK, Hwang E, Ono Y, Nahapetyan L. A cross-cultural comparison of hospice development in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2010. 25:1–19.

10. Hwang NM, No IC. Institutionalization of hospice care for the management of terminal patients. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. 1995.

11. Lee KS, Kim JH, Joo JS, Kim SM, Park JH, Kim HS, et al. A study on the hospice payment development of the payment system for hospice services and of the quality control system, and designing of pilot program. 2008.

12. Cawley J. Contingent valuation analysis of willingness to pay to reduce childhood obesity. Econ Hum Biol. 2008. 6:281–292.

13. Shih HC, Chou P, Chen SJ, Liu JH, Lee FL, Liu CM, et al. A community-based study of the willingness to pay associated with screening for diabetic retinopathy among type 2 diabetes in Kinmen, Taiwan. J Epidemiol. 2007. 17:186–193.

14. Lofgren C, Thanh NX, Chuc NT, Emmelin A, Lindholm L. People's Willingness to pay for health insurance in rural Vietnam. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2008. 6:16.

15. Arrow KR, Solow PR, Portney EE, Leamer R, Radner , Schuman H. Report of the NOAA(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) panel on contingent valuation. Fed Regist. 1993. 58:4601–4614.

16. Alberini A. Optimal Designs for Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys: Single-bound Double-bound and Bivariate Models. J Environ Econ Manage. 1995. 28:287–306.

17. Hong SK. Economic Valuation of Yeido Park: Application of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Method. J Korean Inst Landsc Archit. 1998. 26:90–103.

18. Abernethy RB. The New Weibull Handbook: Reliability & Statistical Analysis for Predicting Life, Safety, Survivability, Risk, Cost and Warranty Claims. 2000. 4th ed. Florida: RB: Abernethy.

19. Miyashita M, Morita T, Hirai K. Evaluation of end-of-life cancer care from the perspective of bereaved family members: the Japanese experience. J Clin Oncol. 2008. 26:3845–3852.

20. Tang ST, Chen ML, Huang EW, Koong SL, Lin GL, Hsiao SC. Hospice utilization in Taiwan by cancer patients who died between 2000 and 2004. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007. 33:446–453.

21. Statistics Korea. 2005 Report on the Population and Housing Census. 2006. Accessed 2010. 4. 5. Available at http://www.kostat.go.kr/nso_main/nsoMainAction.do?method=search&catgrp=nso2009&catid1=k09___0000&catid2=k09i__0000&forward=search.

22. Smith R, Abel Olsen J, Harris A. A review of methodological issues in the conduct of willingness-to-pay studies in health care: issues in the analysis and interpretation of WTP data. In centre for Health Program Evaluation Working Paper 86. 1999. West Heidelberg: Monash University.

23. Bärnighausen T, Liu Y, Zhang X, Sauerborn R. Willingness to pay for social health insurance among informal sector workers in Wuhan, China: a contingent valuation study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007. 7:114.

24. Rasch A, Hodek JM, Runge C, Greiner W. Determinants of willingness to pay for a new therapy in a sample of menopausal-aged women. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009. 27:693–704.

25. Yasunaga H, Ide H, Imamura T, Ohe K. Analysis of factors affecting willingness to pay for cardiovascular disease-related medical services. Int Heart J. 2006. 47:273–286.

26. Marra CA, Frighetto L, Goodfellow AF, Wai AO, Chase ML, Nicol RE, et al. Willingness to pay to assess patient preferences for therapy in a Canadian setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005. 5:43.