Yonsei Med J.  2009 Aug;50(4):525-528. 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.4.525.

Detection of Occludable Angles with the Pentacam and the Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography

Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kcyeye@yuhs.ac

Abstract

PURPOSE
To assess efficacy of the Pentacam (PTC) and the anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AOCT) for detection of occludable angles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourty-one eyes with gonioscopically diagnosed occludable angles and 32 normal open-angle eyes were included. Anterior chamber angle (ACA) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) were measured with PTC and AOCT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed for each parameter and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS: Values of ACA and ACD measured by PTC and AOCT were similar not only in normal open angle eyes but also in occludable angle eyes. For detection of occludable angle, the AUCs of PTC with ACA and ACD were 0.935 and 0.969, respectively. The AUCs of AOCT with ACA and ACD were 0.904 and 0.947, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both PTC and AOCT allow accurate discrimination between open and occludable angle eyes, so that they may aid to screening the occludable angles.

Keyword

Pentacam; anterior segment optical coherence tomography; occludable angle; anterior chamber angle; anterior chamber depth

MeSH Terms

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anterior Chamber/*anatomy & histology
Humans
Middle Aged
Tomography, Optical Coherence/*methods

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Receiver operating characteristic curves. (A) Anterior chamber angle by Pentacam. (B) Anterior chamber angle by Anterior segment optical coherent tomography. (C) Anterior chamber depth by Pentacam. (D) Anterior chamber depth by anterior segment optical coherent tomography.


Cited by  1 articles

Comparison of Measurement of Anterior Segment Parameters Between Scheimpflug Camera and Ultrasound Biomicroscopy
Yong-sik Park, Hyunseok Ahn, Na Rae Kim, Kyoung Tak Ma, Samin Hong, Gong Je Seong, Chan Yun Kim
J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2009;50(12):1847-1852.    doi: 10.3341/jkos.2009.50.12.1847.


Reference

1. Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, Bernardi P, De Franco I, Perfetti S, et al. Epidemiology of angle-closure glaucoma: prevalence, clinical types, and association with peripheral anterior chamber depth in the Egna-Neumarket Glaucoma Study. Ophthalmology. 2000. 107:998–1003.
2. Foster PJ, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in China: how big is the problem? Br J Ophthalmol. 2001. 85:1277–1282.
Article
3. Alsbirk PH. Anterior chamber depth and primary angle-closure glaucoma. I. An epidemiologic study in Greenland Eskimos. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1975. 53:89–104.
4. Chew PT, Aung T. Primary angle-closure glaucoma in Asia. J Glaucoma. 2001. 10:S7–S8.
Article
5. Dandona L, Dandona R, Mandal P, Srinivas M, John RK, McCarty CA, et al. The Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Angle-closure glaucoma in an urban population in southern India. Ophthalmology. 2000. 107:1710–1716.
Article
6. Radhakrishnan S, Goldsmith J, Huang D, Westphal V, Dueker DK, Rollins AM, et al. Comparison of optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy for detection of narrow anterior chamber angles. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005. 123:1053–1059.
Article
7. Radhakrishnan S, Huang D, Smith SD. Optical coherence tomography imaging of the anterior chamber angle. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2005. 18:375–381. vi
Article
8. Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002. 86:238–242.
Article
9. Friedman DS. Who needs an iridotomy? Br J Ophthalmol. 2001. 85:1019–1021.
Article
10. Foster PJ, Devereux JG, Alsbirk PH, Lee PS, Uranchimeg D, Machin D, et al. Detection of gonioscopically occludable angles and primary angle closure glaucoma by estimation of limbal chamber depth in Asians: modified grading scheme. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000. 84:186–192.
Article
11. Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Skorpik C. Validity and repeatability of anterior chamber depth measurements with Pentacam and Orbscan. Optom Vis Sci. 2005. 82:858–861.
12. Gazzard G, Foster PJ, Friedman DS, Khaw PT, Seah S. Light to dark physiological variation in irido-trabecular angle width. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004. 88:1357–1482. Video report. http://bjo.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/88/11/DC1/1.
13. Nolan WP, See J, Aung T, Ce Z, Radhakrishnan S, Friedman DS, et al. Detection of patients at risk of angle-closure using anterior segment OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005. 46:E-Abstract 145.
14. Nolan WP, See JL, Chew PT, Friedman DS, Smith SD, Radhakrishnan S, et al. Detection of primary angle closure using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in Asian eyes. Ophthalmology. 2007. 114:33–39.
Article
15. Ishikawa H, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Quantitative assessment of the anterior segment using ultrasound biomicroscopy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000. 11:133–139.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr