Yonsei Med J.  2009 Jun;50(3):427-436. 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.3.427.

What Qualities Do Medical School Applicants Need to Have? : Secondary Publication

Affiliations
  • 1Medical Education Center, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
  • 2Department of Medical Education, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. skim@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE: Doctors are asked to play the roles of both a healer and a professional. In dealing with this inherent demand, we should first ask ourselves if we are selecting students who show traits that would enable them to become a good doctor. The primary concern of this study was to identify the core elements of medical professionalism that will develop into professional competence that we should be sought in medical school applicants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
One hundred-six responses from the Delphi survey done by medical school professors and 230 completed questionnaires from medical students were used for analysis. We also set out to analyze the level of medical professionalism in newly entering medical students using a 5-point Likert scale.
RESULTS
Of the 27 elements of medical professionalism examined, the most important core element was thought to be 'life-long learning skills'. The level of professionalism in Korean medical students was mostly assessed to be less than the 3.0 mean score given by the professors. Medical students tended to rate themselves higher than did the professors for their level of medical professionalism.
CONCLUSION
Medical professionalism can be categorized into three domains; professional knowledge, professional skills, and professional attitude. For the prominent differences in the recognition of the levels of professionalism elements in medical students by students and professors, further studies investigating the reasons for discrepancy are needed.

Keyword

Professional competence; medical students; elements

MeSH Terms

Data Collection
Delivery of Health Care/standards
Education, Medical/standards
Physician's Role
Professional Competence/standards
Schools, Medical/*standards
Students, Medical/*statistics & numerical data

Cited by  2 articles

Are There Gaps between Medical Students and Professors in the Perception of Students' Professionalism Level? - Secondary Publication
Yera Hur
Yonsei Med J. 2009;50(6):751-756.    doi: 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.6.751.

Definition of character for medical education based on expert opinions in Korea
Yera Hur, Sun Huh
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:26.    doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.26.


Reference

1. Kang YS. Concept of medical professionalism in Korea. Symposium material of "Professionalism in Medicine". 2005. Ewha Women's University College of Medicine/Korea University College of Medicine;15–25.
2. Kim IW. Professionalism issues in medical education. Report of The 18th Joint Conference on Medical Education - Doctors and Society. 2001. The Korean Council of Deans of Medical College/The Korean Society of Medical Education;25–31.
3. Lee KA, Ahn DS, Lee YM. Validity of competency on defining specific concept of a good physician. Report of The 17th Joint Conference on Medical Education. 2005. The Korean Council of Deans of Medical College/The Korean Society of Medical Education/Korean Academy of Medical Sciences;166–167.
4. Kim S, Hur Y. Medical Professionalism in The 21st Century: How Can we Teach it? Korean J Med Educ. 2003. 15:171–186.
5. Swick HM. Toward a normative definition of medical professionalism. Acad Med. 2000. 75:612–616.
Article
6. Wagner P, Hendrich J, Moseley G, Hudson V. Defining medical professionalism: a qualitative study. Med Educ. 2007. 41:288–294.
Article
7. Ahn DS. Professionalism as general education. Symposium material of "Medical Professionalism: education and its implementation.". 2005. Yeungnam University College of Medicine/The Korean Society of Medical Education;3–15.
8. Kang SI, Yeo I, Park SJ, Shin DW, Koo YM, Kim JH, et al. Social Anthropology of Medicine. 2004. Seoul: Jin Young Publication.
9. Royal College of Physicians. Doctors in society: medical professionalism in a changing world-Report of a Working Party. 2005. Royal College of Physicians.
10. Beauchamp G. The challenge of teaching professionalism. Ann Acad Medi Singapore. 2004. 33:697–705.
11. Cho BH. A study on physicians' professionalism and their job satisfaction. J Korean Soc Assoc. 1994. 28:37–63.
12. Medical Professionalism. CMAJ. 2002. 167:539–541.
13. Cruess SR, Johnston S, Cruess RL. "Profession": a working definition for medical educators. Teach Learn Med. 2004. 16:74–76.
14. Johnson MP, Abrams SL. Historical perspectives of autonomy within the medical profession: considerations for 21st century physical therapy practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005. 35:628–636.
15. Thompson HL. WHA (World Medical Association) scientific session on "Professional autonomy and self-regulation". World Med J. 1988. 35:12–15.
16. Van De Camp K, Vernooij-Dassen MJ, Grol RP, Bottema BJ. How to conceptualize professionalism: a qualitative study. Med Teach. 2004. 26:696–702.
Article
17. Miettinen OS, Flegel KM. Elementary concepts of medicine: X. Being a good doctor: professionalism. J Eval Clin Pract. 2003. 9:341–343.
Article
18. Luijk S. Summer course-Expanding Horizons in Problem-based Learning Workshop material. 2002. Maastricht Medical School.
19. Ainsworth MA, Szauter KM. Medical student professionalism: are we measuring the right behaviors? A comparison of professional lapses by students and physicians. Acad Med. 2006. 81(10):Suppl. S83–S86.
Article
20. Gadon M, Glasser M. Medical professionalism and social accountability in medical education. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2006. 19:287–288.
Article
21. Lindemann J, Soule D. Teaching professionalism to medical students: a faculty guide. S D Med. 2006. 59:203–205.
22. Lo B. Professionalism in the age of computerised medical records. Singapore Med J. 2006. 47:1018–1022.
23. The Korean Council of Deans of Medical College. Korean Medical Schools 2004-2005. 2004. Seoul: The Korean Council of Deans of Medical College.
24. Beretta R. A critical review of the Delphi technique. Int J Nurs Stud. 1996. 3:79–89.
Article
25. Sleep J, Renfrew M, Dunn A, Bowler U, Garcia J. Establishing priorities for research: a report of a Delphi survey. BJM. 1995. 3:323–331.
26. Monekosso G. Essential medical studies: introducing a core curriculum based on the doctor- patient encounter as a catalyst for medical education reform. Medical Teacher. 1998. 20:536–543.
Article
27. Wagner P, Hendrich J, Moseley G, Hudson V. Defining medical professionalism: a qualitative study. Med Educ. 2007. 41:288–294.
Article
28. Baik SH. The New Horizon for Evaluations in Medical Education in Korea. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2005. 2:7–22.
Article
29. Kang S, Yeo I, Park SJ, Shin DW, Koo YM, Kim JH, Kim DW, Lee BH, Kim KK, Kim WJ. Social anthropology of medicine. 2004. Pusan: Jin Young Publication Co..
30. Cho BH. Job satisfaction in professionalism of physicians. J Korean Soc Assoc. 1994. 28:37–63.
31. Park JH. A study of the trend of medical professionalism in Korea. J Korean Soc Assoc. 1993. 27:219–243.
32. Lim KY. Teaching professionalism in Korean medical schools. Korean J Med Educ. 2007. 19:267–269.
Article
33. Hong CG. Doctors' professionalism and medical education. Paper presented at: 14th Korean Medical Education Academic Conference. 2003. May 2; Seoul, Korea.
34. The Korean Council of Deans of Medical College. Korean medical education plan for 21st century. 2000. Seoul: The Korean Council of Deans of Medical College.
35. ABIM Foundation, American Board of Internal Medicine. ACP-ASIM Foundation. American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine. European Federation of Internal Medicine. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physi-cian charter. Ann Intern Med. 2002. 136:243–246.
36. ABIM Foundation. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Accessed October 15, 2008. http://www.abimfoundation.org/professionalism/pdf_charter/ABIM_Charter_Ins.pdf.
37. Association of American Medical Colleges(AAMC). Physicians for the twenty-first century: The GPEP Report. Position paper from the AAMC. 1984. Washington, DC:
38. Outcome project. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education(AGCME). Accessed October 15, 2008. (http://www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/GeneralCompetenciesStandards21307.pdf).
39. Hur Y. An analysis of the core elements and curriculum evaluation of medical professionalism [dissertation]. 2006. Seoul: Yonsei University.
40. Park J. Medical students' attitudes toward the patient-doctor relation-ship. Korean J Med Educ. 2007. 19:215–223.
Article
41. Kim S, Hur YR. How are we going to evaluate medical professionalism? Korean J Med Educ. 2005. 17:1–14.
Article
42. Harden RM, Sowden S, Dunn WR. Educational strategies in the curriculum development: the SPICES model. Med Educ. 1984. 18:284–297.
43. Kasar J, Clark NE. Developing Professional Behaviors. 2000. New York, NY: Slack Inc.
44. Wear D, Aultman JM. Professionalism in medicine. 2006. NJ: Springer.
45. Papadakis MA, Loeser H, Healy K. Early detection and evaluation of professionalism deficiencies in medical students: one school's approach. Acad Med. 2001. 76:1100–1106.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr