Yonsei Med J.  2005 Aug;46(4):539-545. 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.4.539.

Intradiscal Electrothermal Treatment for Chronic Lower Back Pain Patients with Internal Disc Disruption

• Park SY
• Moon SH
• Park MS
• Kim HS
• Choi YJ
• Lee HM

• KMID: 1716525
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2005.46.4.539

Abstract

Chronic lower back pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal problems; it is also the most expensive industrial injury. Not surprisingly, many treatments have been developed to combat this expensive and debilitating condition. One of these, intradiscal electrothermal treatment (IDET), was developed for patients with chronic discogenic lower back pain who failed to improve with any of the wide variety of non- surgical treatments. The present study sought to evaluate the efficacy of IDET for patients with chronic lower back pain. Twenty-five patients were enrolled in this prospective study; the patients received IDET between June 2001 and June 2003. MRI was used to confirm the diagnosis of internal disc disruption in all patients. The patients then underwent a pre-operative provocative test and discography. The follow-up duration was at least 1 year in all cases, and the visual analogue scale, recovery rate, and satisfaction of each patient were evaluated. The average age of the patients was 32 years (age range 18 to 49 years), and the patient group was 33% male and 67% female. Of the 25 patients, 5 underwent lumbar fusion surgery within 1 year of IDET. After IDET, 8 patients (32%) reported more pain than before, 14 patients (56%) reported less pain, and 3 patients (12%) experienced no change. Twelve patients (48%) were satisfied with IDET, 11 (44%) were dissatisfied, and 2 (8%) were undecided about the treatment. At least 1 year after IDET, nearly half the study patients were dissatisfied with their medical outcome. Consequently, 5 patients (20%) underwent fusion surgery at 1 year after IDET. Although other studies have shown good results with IDET for at least 2 years, this investigation suggests the IDET may be somewhat less effective. In order to firmly establish the efficacy of IDET for treating chronic discogenic lower back pain, additional studies with larger numbers of patients evaluated over longer time periods are recommended.

Keyword

Intradiscal electrothermal treatment (IDET) ; internal disc disruption; back pain

MeSH Terms

Adolescent
Adult
Chronic Disease
Electrocoagulation/adverse effects/*methods
Female
Humans
Intervertebral Disk Displacement/*surgery
Low Back Pain/*surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Post IDET MRI films show end plate edema and erosion of L3 and L4. These findings are compatible to iatrogenic discitis.

Reference

1. Kelsey JL, White AA. Epidemiology and impact of low back pain. Spine. 1980. 5:133–142.

2. Nachemson AL, Bigos S. Cruess RL, Rennie WRJ, editors. The low back pain. Adult orthopaedics. 1984. New York: Churchill-Livingstone;843–937.

3. Spengler DM, Bigos S, Martin NA, Zeh J, Fisher L, Nachemson A. Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study. Spine. 1986. 11:241–245.

4. Anderson GBJ. Epidemiological features of chronic low back pain. Lancet. 1999. 354:581–585.

5. Schwartzer AC, Aprill CN, Derby R, Fortin J, Kine G, Bogduk N. The prevalence and clinical features of internal disc disruption in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 1995. 20:1878–1883.

6. Crock HV. A reappraisal of intervertebral disc lesions. Med J Aust. 1970. 1:983–989.

7. Kevin TF, Lamgston TH, James DS. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine. 2003. 28:S26–S35.

8. Foley KT, Lefkowitz MA. Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurosurg. 2002. 49:499–517.

9. Saal JA, Saal JS, Ashley J. Targeted intradiscal thermal therapy: preliminary feasibility results. Presented at the anual meeting of the international society for the study of the lumbar spine. June 2-6, 1997; Singapore.

10. Saal JA, Saal JS. Intradiscal electrothermal treatment for chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine. 2002. 27:966–974.

11. Ashok B, Andersson GBJ, Chaudhary H, An HS. Intradiscal electrothermal therapy: A treatment option in patients with internal disc disruption. Spine. 2003. 28:S8–S14.

12. Karasek M, Bogduk N. Twelve-month follow up of a controlled trial of intradiscal thermal anuloplasty for back pain due to internal disc disruption. Spine. 2000. 25:2601–2607.

13. Timothy TD, Rick BD, Parveen S, Goldstein TB. The IDET procedure for chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine. 2004. 29:752–756.

14. Wetzel FD, Mcnally TA, Philips FM. Intradiscal electrothermal therapy used to manage chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine. 2002. 27:2621–2626.

15. Kleinstueck FS, Diederich CJ, Nau WH, Puttlitz CM, Smith JA, Bradford D, et al. Acute biomechanical and histological effects of intradiscal electrothermal therapy on human lumbar discs. Spine. 2001. 26:2198–2207.

16. Cohen SP, Larkin T, Abdi S, Chang A, Stojanovic M. Risk factors for failure and complications of intradiscal electrothermal therapy: A pilot study. Spine. 2003. 28:1142–1147.

17. Thompson JP, Pearce RH, Schechter MT, Adams ME, Tsang IKT, Bishop PB. Preliminary evaluation of a scheme for grading the gross morphology of the human intervetebral disc. Spine. 1990. 15:411–415.

18. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Holder J, Boos N. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine. 2001. 26:1873–1878.

19. Briney TJ, White JJ, Berens D. Comparison of MRI and discography in the diagnosis of lumbar degenerative disc disease. Spine. 1998. 23:1259–1260.

20. Collins CD, Stack JP, O'Connell DJ, Walsh M, Mcmanus FP, Redmond OM, et al. The role of discography in lumbar disc disease a comparative study of MRI and discography. Clin Radiol. 1990. 42:252–257.

21. Bogduk N, Tynan W, Wilson AS. The nerve supply to the human intervertebral discs. J Anat. 1981. 132:39–56.

22. Groen GJ, Baljet B, Drukker J. The nerve and nerve plexuses of the human vertebral column. Am J Anat. 1990. 188:282–296.

23. Freemont AJ, Peacock TE, Goupille P, Hoyland JA, OBrien J, Jayson MI. Nerve ingrowth into disease intervertebral disc in low back pain. Lancet. 1997. 350:178–181.

24. Coppes MH, Marani E, Thomeer RT, Gerbrand J. Innervation of painful lumbar disc disease. Spine. 1997. 22:2342–2350.

25. Letcher F, Goldring S. The effect of radiofrequency current and heat on peripheral nerve action potential in the cat. J Neurosurg. 1968. 29:42–47.

26. Saal JA, Saal JS. Thermal characteristics of lumbar disc: Evaluation of a novel approach to targeted intradiscal thermal therapy. Presented at the 13th annual meeting of the North American Spine Society. October 28-31, 1998; San Francisco, California.

27. Lee J, Luts GE, Campbell D, Rodeo SA, Wright T. Stability of the spine after intradiscal electrothermal therapy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001. 82:120–122.

28. Djurasovic M, Glassman SD, Dimar JR, Johnson JR. Vertebral osteonecrosis associated with the use of intradiscal electrothermal therapy. Spine. 2002. 27:E325–E328.

29. Cohen SP, Larkin T, Polly D. A giant herniated disc following intradiscal electrothermal therapy. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002. 15:537–541.