J Korean Med Sci.  2012 May;27(Suppl):S82-S87. 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.S.S82.

Discussions and Implications of the Recent Enactment & Revision of the Healthcare Law

Affiliations
  • 1Asian Institute for Bioethic and Health Law Researcher, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. syoonkim@yuhs.ac
  • 2Graduate School of Medical Law & Ethics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Medical Law & Ethics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

Recently, there have been many changes in the area of healthcare. There is no certainty how these changes will affect the healthcare system and public health. However, to at least have these changes positively implemented, it is clear that evaluation through continuous monitoring is necessary. The enforcement of the Medical Institution Accreditation and Medical Dispute Mediation Law as well as legal revisions regarding the public healthcare system are changes to improve the quality of healthcare, while at the same time, provide penalties for infractions of the new law such as medicine/medical device rebates; moreover, legal revisions regarding telemedicine are anticipated to impartially vitalize technical development as well as the pharmaceutical industry. For these changes to have a positive effect on the medical field and people's lives, an accurate comprehension of the system and understanding of the details is necessary to be able to respond sensitively to any changes in the future. Therefore, this paper examined the background information on the current discussion on the changes in the healthcare system, examined the detailed content of the system, and reviewed the areas that were in dispute as well as the main issues to contemplate the expected effects of the changes and future tasks that may be generated as a result. These considerations will act as foundation for an in depth understanding of recent trends in the healthcare system.

Keyword

Healthcare; Medical Dispute; Medical Institution Accreditation; Public Healthcare; Rebate; Telemedicine

MeSH Terms

Accreditation/legislation & jurisprudence
Delivery of Health Care/*legislation & jurisprudence
Health Care Reform
Humans
Quality of Health Care
Telemedicine

Reference

1. Cho WH, Lee SG, Kim SY, Kim JY, Lee SM, Jang HS, Kim JR, Kim GM, Kang HH. Evaluation task force installed and operated medical facility assessment study on small and medium hospitals. 2009. Korea Health Industry Development Institute;22–27.
2. Kim DJ. Accreditation means accreditation of healthcare: medical law revision. Nati Assem Revi. 2010. 529:90–91.
3. Ministry of Health and Welfare. New year work report in the Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2011. 25–27.
4. The Asian Institute for Bioethics and Health Law, Yonsei University. Revisions to the law on public health research. Research reports. 2010. 96–144.
5. Health and Welfare Committee. Public health and medical service act amendment bill. Review reports. 2011. 1–20.
6. The Asian Institute for Bioethics and Health Law, Center for Competition Law, Yonsei University. Development of health industry series forumimprovement of the rebate practices. 2010. 144–145.
7. Lee WJ, Hong SW, Park JH, Jung YC. The legal issues of telemedicine in medical law. Korean J Med Law. 2003. 11:54–60.
8. Lee EJ, Kim SY, Chae YM. Legislation direction for health information privacy in the telemedicine era. J Korean Soc Med Inform. 2009. 15:361–371.
9. Lee SY, Choei BH, Kim SY, Yun GJ, Che SM, Hwang D. System improvement plan for the advancement of healthcare. 2008. Ministry of Health & Welfare;309–311.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr