J Korean Med Sci.  2012 May;27(Suppl):S76-S81. 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.S.S76.

Biomedical Ethics Policy in Korea: Characteristics and Historical Development

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Medical Humanities & Social Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
  • 2Department of Medical Law and Ethics, Asian Institute for Boiethics and Health Law, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. arete2@yuhs.ac

Abstract

Ethical consideration is an inseparable part of policy-making in modern society. Biomedical ethics is an interdisciplinary study of ethical issues that result from advances in medical practices and research. Because these issues often arise at the bedside, society must provide solutions or judgments that are effective and applicable. Thus, the development and progress of biomedical ethics has been made possible via the cooperation of experts from diverse backgrounds. The biomedical ethics discourse should not be seen as a conflict between values but as a collective activity for problem-solving. To support this perspective on ethics discourse, a historical perspective on biomedical ethics in Korea was given emphasis on the participants and their perspectives. Major cases and the changes resulting therefrom were discussed with the agenda proposed. The Korean situation with respect to ethics development shows the interactions between groups participating in policy development and its collaborative nature.

Keyword

Biomedical Ethics; Medical Ethics; Korea; Policy

MeSH Terms

*Bioethics/history
*Ethics, Medical/history
Health Policy
History, 20th Century
History, 21st Century
Humans
Republic of Korea

Reference

1. Jonsen AR, Toulmin S. The abuse of casuistry: a history of moral reasoning. 1987. Berkley CA: University of California Press;172.
2. Fox R. The sociology of medicine: a participant observer's view. 1994. Seoul: Nanam;120–124.
3. Kultgen J. Ethics and Professionalsim. 1988. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press;112.
4. Veatch RM. The birth of bioethics: autobiographical reflections of a patient person. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2002. 11:344–352.
5. Shin DW. History of medical ethics in Korea: focused on analysis of medical codes and covenants. Korean J Med Hist. 2000. 9:163–204.
6. Shin DC, Lee I. The development of medical ethics in Korea. Jpn Med Assoc J. 2007. 50:218–225.
7. Kang S. A history and philosophy of bio-medical ethics seen from a dentist's point of view. Korean J Med Hist. 2002. 11:117–136.
8. Yeo IS, Park YJ, Lee KL, Park HW. A history of medical license in Korea. Korean J Med Hist. 2002. 11:137–153.
9. Choi EK, Chang KH, Kim SY, Kwon I, Kim O. Ethics education in medical schools in Korea: current status and problems concerning teachers, materials, and methodologies. Korean J Med Ethics Educ. 2006. 9:44–59.
10. Bishop JP, Jotterand F. Bioethics as biopolitics. J Med Philos. 2006. 31:205–212.
11. Dewey J. Human nature and conduct: an introduction to social psychology. 1922. New York: Promethues Books.
12. Sulmasy DP. Sugarman J, Sulmasy DP, editors. Research in medical ethics: physician-assisted suicide. Methods in medical ethics. 2001. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press;247–266.
13. Korea. Framework act on health and medical services. Article 6.
14. Will liberalizing abortion make women happy? Korea Prolife. accessed on 4 December 2011. Available at http://www.prolife.or.kr.
15. Prolife doctors complaint 3 medical facilities for illegal abortion. The Korean Doctors Weekly. accessed 27 May 2011. Available at http://doc3.koreahealthlog.com/36086.
16. Introduction to KONOS. Korea Network for Organ Sharing. accessed on 1 June 2011. Available at http://www.konos.go.kr.
17. Korea. Internal Organ ETC. Transplant Act. Article 9.
18. Kim MG, Jeong JC, Cho EJ, Huh KH, Yang J, Byeon NI, Yu JS, Bang KT, Chung HS, Ha JW, et al. Operational and regulatory system requirements for pursuing self-sufficiency in deceased donor organ transplantation program in Korea. J Korean Soc Transplant. 2010. 24:147–158.
19. Joo HN. Comparative study of Korean and German transplantation Act. Korean Criminal Law Association. Proceeding for 2006 Biannual Symposium for KCLA. 2006. Seoul: KCLA.
20. Korea. Internal Organ ETC. Transplant Act. Article 14 to 19.
21. Korea Supreme Court Decision 2002Do995. Decided 24 June 2004.
22. Kim JH. Legal considerations on discharge against medical advice: the case at Boramae Hospital. Proceeding book of 2005 International Congress on Medical Law. 2005. 1035–1042.
23. Kim KY. The medico-legal and ethical problems of withholding/withdrawing of futile life-sustaining mechanical respirator treatment. Tuberc Respir Dis. 2005. 58:213–229.
24. Korea Association of Medical Sciences. Medical ethics guideline on foregoing life-sustaining treatment of dying patient. 2002. Seoul: KAMS.
25. Korea. Medical Service Act. Article 23-2.
26. Korea National Board of Bioethics. Reports on bioethical issues of WS Hwang's research. 2006. Seoul: KNBB.
27. Korea. Bioethics and Safety Act.
28. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. Directive on securing research integrity. 2008.
29. Korea Supreme Court Decision 2009Da17417. Decided 21 May 2009.
30. Ad Hoc Committee of Korean Medical Association. Guideline for withdrawing life-sustaining treatment. 2009. Seoul:
31. Intensive care specialists' perspectives on life-sustaining treatment. Annual report of BPRC for 2010. Bioethics Policy Research Center. Available at http://bprc.re.kr.
32. Murrary TH, White RS. Elliott JM, Ho WC, Lim SS, editors. Public engagement and bioethics commissions. Bioethics in Singapore: the ethical microsm. 2010. Singapore: World Scientific;165–185.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr