J Korean Med Sci.  2010 Jan;25(1):123-127. 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.1.123.

Severity of Post-stroke Aphasia According to Aphasia Type and Lesion Location in Koreans

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea. njpaik@snu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
  • 3Department of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Clinical Neuroscience Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
  • 4Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

To determine the relations between post-stroke aphasia severity and aphasia type and lesion location, a retrospective review was undertaken using the medical records of 97 Korean patients, treated within 90 days of onset, for aphasia caused by unilateral left hemispheric stroke. Types of aphasia were classified according to the validated Korean version of the Western Aphasia Battery (K-WAB), and severities of aphasia were quantified using WAB Aphasia Quotients (AQ). Lesion locations were classified as cortical or subcortical, and were determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Two-step cluster analysis was performed using AQ values to classify aphasia severity by aphasia type and lesion location. Cluster analysis resulted in four severity clusters: 1) mild; anomic type, 2) moderate; Wernicke's, transcortical motor, transcortical sensory, conduction, and mixed transcortical types, 3) moderately severe; Broca's aphasia, and 4) severe; global aphasia, and also in three lesion location clusters: 1) mild; subcortical 2) moderate; cortical lesions involving Broca's and/or Wernicke's areas, and 3) severe; insular and cortical lesions not in Broca's or Wernicke's areas. These results revealed that within 3 months of stroke, global aphasia was the more severely affected type and cortical lesions were more likely to affect language function than subcortical lesions.

Keyword

Stroke; Aphasia; Classification

MeSH Terms

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anomia/etiology/pathology
Aphasia/classification/etiology/*pathology
Aphasia, Broca/diagnosis/etiology/*pathology
Aphasia, Wernicke/diagnosis/etiology/*pathology
Cluster Analysis
Disability Evaluation
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Republic of Korea
Retrospective Studies
Severity of Illness Index
Stroke/*complications/pathology
Time Factors

Cited by  3 articles

The Factors Associated with Good Responses to Speech Therapy Combined with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Post-stroke Aphasic Patients
Il-Young Jung, Jong Youb Lim, Eun Kyoung Kang, Hae Min Sohn, Nam-Jong Paik
Ann Rehabil Med. 2011;35(4):460-469.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2011.35.4.460.

Subcortical Aphasia After Stroke
Eun Kyoung Kang, Hae Min Sohn, Moon-Ku Han, Nam-Jong Paik
Ann Rehabil Med. 2017;41(5):725-733.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.5.725.

Predictors of Therapy Response in Chronic Aphasia: Building a Foundation for Personalized Aphasia Therapy
Sigfus Kristinsson, Dirk B. den Ouden, Chris Rorden, Roger Newman-Norlund, Jean Neils-Strunjas, Julius Fridriksson
J Stroke. 2022;24(2):189-206.    doi: 10.5853/jos.2022.01102.


Reference

1. Choi-Kwon S, Kim HS, Kwon SU, Kim JS. Factors affecting the burden on caregivers of stroke survivors in South Korea. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005. 86:1043–1048.
Article
2. Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen TS. Aphasia after stroke: type, severity and prognosis. The Copenhagen aphasia study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004. 17:35–43.
3. Wade DT, Hewer RL, David RM, Enderby PM. Aphasia after stroke: natural history and associated deficits. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986. 49:11–16.
Article
4. Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang C, Zhao X, Gong X, Sun X, Chen H, Wang Y. Study on the pathogenic mechanism of Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Neurol Res. 2006. 28:59–65.
Article
5. Murdoch BE. Subcortical brain mechanisms in speech and language. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2001. 53:233–251.
Article
6. Hillis AE, Barker PB, Wityk RJ, Aldrich EM, Restrepo L, Breese EL, Work M. Variability in subcortical aphasia is due to variable sites of cortical hypoperfusion. Brain Lang. 2004. 89:524–530.
Article
7. Shewan CM, Kertesz A. Reliability and validity characteristics of the Western aphasia battery (WAB). J Speech Hear Disord. 1980. 45:308–324.
Article
8. Kertesz A. Western aphasia battery test manual. 1982. New York: Grune & Stratton.
9. Kertesz A. Aphasia and associated disorders: taxonomy, localization, and recovery. 1979. New York: Grune & Stratton.
10. Kertesz A, Poole E. The aphasia quotient: the taxonomic approach to measurement of aphasic disability. Can J Neurol Sci. 1974. 1:7–16.
Article
11. Thompson CK. The neurobiology of language recovery in aphasia. Brain Lang. 2000. 71:245–248.
Article
12. Kim H, Na DL. Paradise. Korean version-the Western Aphasia Battery (Paradise. K-WAB). 2001. Seoul: Paradise Welfare Foundation, Institute for Children with Disabilities.
13. Damasio H, Damasio A. Lesion analysis in neuropsychology. 1989. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971. 9:97–113.
Article
15. Martinez IN, Moran JM, Pena FJ. Two-step cluster procedure after principal component analysis identifies sperm subpopulations in canine ejaculates and its relation to cryoresistance. J Androl. 2006. 27:596–603.
Article
16. Kauhanen ML, Korpelainen JT, Hiltunen P, Maatta R, Mononen H, Brusin E, Sotaniemi KA, Myllyla VV. Aphasia, depression, and nonverbal cognitive impairment in ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000. 10:455–461.
Article
17. de Boissezon X, Demonet JF, Puel M, Marie N, Raboyeau G, Albucher JF, Chollet F, Cardebat D. Subcortical aphasia: a longitudinal PET study. Stroke. 2005. 36:1467–1473.
18. Bakheit AM, Shaw S, Carrington S, Griffiths S. The rate and extent of improvement with therapy from the different types of aphasia in the first year after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2007. 21:941–949.
Article
19. Jensen AM, Chenery HJ, Copland DA. A comparison of picture description abilities in individuals with vascular subcortical lesions and Huntington's disease. J Commun Disord. 2006. 39:62–77.
Article
20. Nadeau SE, Crosson B. Subcortical aphasia. Brain Lang. 1997. 58:355–402.
Article
21. Kim H, Na DL. Normative data on the Korean version of the Western Aphasia Battery. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004. 26:1011–1020.
Article
22. Berthier ML. Poststroke aphasia: epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment. Drugs Aging. 2005. 22:163–182.
23. Devinsky O, D'Esposito M. Neurology of cognitive and behavioral disorders. 2004. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Kreisler A, Godefroy O, Delmaire C, Debachy B, Leclercq M, Pruvo JP, Leys D. The anatomy of aphasia revisited. Neurology. 2000. 54:1117–1123.
Article
25. Asanuma C, Andersen RA, Cowan WM. The thalamic relations of the caudal inferior parietal lobule and the lateral prefrontal cortex in monkeys: divergent cortical projections from cell clusters in the medial pulvinar nucleus. J Comp Neurol. 1985. 241:357–381.
Article
26. Van Buren JM, Borke RC. Alterations in speech and the pulvinar. A serial section study of cerebrothalamic relationships in cases of acquired speech disorders. Brain. 1969. 92:255–284.
27. Mega MS, Alexander MP. Subcortical aphasia: the core profile of capsulostriatal infarction. Neurology. 1994. 44:1824–1829.
Article
28. Perani D, Vallar G, Cappa S, Messa C, Fazio F. Aphasia and neglect after subcortical stroke. A clinical/cerebral perfusion correlation study. Brain. 1987. 110(Pt 5):1211–1229.
29. Cereda C, Ghika J, Maeder P, Bogousslavsky J. Strokes restricted to the insular cortex. Neurology. 2002. 59:1950–1955.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr