Korean J Radiol.  2013 Oct;14(5):727-732. 10.3348/kjr.2013.14.5.727.

Diagnosis of Acute Global Myocarditis Using Cardiac MRI with Quantitative T1 and T2 Mapping: Case Report and Literature Review

• Park CH
• Choi EY
• Greiser A
• Paek MY
• Hwang SH
• Kim TH

• KMID: 1711426
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2013.14.5.727

Abstract

The diagnosis of myocarditis can be challenging given that symptoms, clinical exam findings, electrocardiogram results, biomarkers, and echocardiogram results are often non-specific. Endocardial biopsy is an established method for diagnosing myocarditis, but carries the risk of complications and false negative results. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the primary non-invasive imaging tool in patients with suspected myocarditis. Myocarditis can be diagnosed by using three tissue markers including edema, hyperemia/capillary leak, and necrosis/fibrosis. The interpretation of cardiac MR findings can be confusing, especially when the myocardium is diffusely involved. Using T1 and T2 maps, the diagnosis of myocarditis can be made even in cases of global myocarditis with the help of quantitative analysis. We herein describe a case of acute global myocarditis which was diagnosed by using quantitative T1 and T2 mapping.

Keyword

Myocarditis; Magnetic resonance imaging; T1 map; T2 map

MeSH Terms

Acute Disease
Adult
Biopsy
Diagnosis, Differential
Electrocardiography
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
Male
Myocarditis/*diagnosis
Myocardium/*pathology

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Cardiac MR findings in acute global myocarditis. Cine images during end-diastolic (A) and end-systolic (B) phases demonstrated global systolic dysfunction with EF of 30%. T2-Weighted images (C) revealed global edema with ratio of myocardium to skeletal muscle of > 2.0. On TI scout images, it was difficult to determine optimal nulling time for LV. We selected 270 ms as ideal nulling time in this study (D). LV = left ventricle, SI = signal intensity, EF = ejection fraction. On LGE images with magnitude and PSIR (E, F), diffuse hyper SI of entire LV myocardium was likely but uncertain. T2 map images (G) and Pre-T1 map images (H) demonstrated diffuse myocardial edema with increased T2 and T1 values. LGE = late gadolinium enhancement, LV = left ventricle, PSIR = phase-sensitive inversion recovery. On post-T1 mapping images (I), mean myocardial T1 value was similar to T1 value for LV cavity. Mean ECV fraction of LV myocardium was 45.9 ± 1.9% (range: 43-49.7%). ECV = extracellular volume, LV = left ventricle

Reference

1. Blauwet LA, Cooper LT. Myocarditis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2010; 52:274–288.

2. Friedrich MG, Sechtem U, Schulz-Menger J, Holmvang G, Alakija P, Cooper LT, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: A JACC White Paper. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53:1475–1487.

3. Feldman AM, McNamara D. Myocarditis. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343:1388–1398.

4. Laissy JP, Messin B, Varenne O, Iung B, Karila-Cohen D, Schouman-Claeys E, et al. MRI of acute myocarditis: a comprehensive approach based on various imaging sequences. Chest. 2002; 122:1638–1648.

5. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2002; 18:539–542.

6. Verhaert D, Thavendiranathan P, Giri S, Mihai G, Rajagopalan S, Simonetti OP, et al. Direct T2 quantification of myocardial edema in acute ischemic injury. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011; 4:269–278.

7. Nacif MS, Turkbey EB, Gai N, Nazarian S, van der Geest RJ, Noureldin RA, et al. Myocardial T1 mapping with MRI: comparison of look-locker and MOLLI sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 34:1367–1373.

8. Ugander M, Oki AJ, Hsu LY, Kellman P, Greiser A, Aletras AH, et al. Extracellular volume imaging by magnetic resonance imaging provides insights into overt and sub-clinical myocardial pathology. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33:1268–1278.

9. Gutberlet M, Spors B, Thoma T, Bertram H, Denecke T, Felix R, et al. Suspected chronic myocarditis at cardiac MR: diagnostic accuracy and association with immunohistologically detected inflammation and viral persistence. Radiology. 2008; 246:401–409.

10. Giri S, Chung YC, Merchant A, Mihai G, Rajagopalan S, Raman SV, et al. T2 quantification for improved detection of myocardial edema. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009; 11:56.

11. Ugander M, Bagi PS, Oki AJ, Chen B, Hsu LY, Aletras AH, et al. Myocardial edema as detected by pre-contrast T1 and T2 CMR delineates area at risk associated with acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 5:596–603.

12. Maceira AM, Joshi J, Prasad SK, Moon JC, Perugini E, Harding I, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac amyloidosis. Circulation. 2005; 111:186–193.