Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2014 May;57(3):187-192. 10.5468/ogs.2014.57.3.187.

Intra-operative complications increase with successive number of cesarean sections: Myth or fact?

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Khalid University Abha College of Medicine, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. abeeharafique@hotmail.com
  • 2Department of Pediatrics, King Khalid University Abha College of Medicine, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To determine whether complications related to surgery increase with increasing number of cesarean sections (CSs) in upper segment placenta. To compare the complications in urgent and elective high order (4-6) repeat CSs.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of 519 women who underwent repeat CS was performed from January to December 2012. Women were divided into 3 groups: group 1 with previous 3 CS (n=325), group 2 with previous 4 CS (n=139), and group 3 with previous > or =5 CS (n=55).
RESULTS
Statistically significant differences (P < 0.001) were observed among 3 groups, regarding mean gravidity, type of CS, midline incision and bilateral tubal ligation performed. The risks of severe intra-peritoneal adhesions, thin out lower uterine segment and bladder injury were significantly increased (P < 0.001) with increasing number of CS deliveries. Only one cesarean hysterectomy was done in group 1 due to post partum hemorrhage. No significant differences were found in blood loss, duration of surgery, post operative hospital stay as well as birth weight and Apgar scores of newborns. The elective and emergency CS groups of high order repeat CS had no remarkable differences in operative, post operative complications and fetal outcome.
CONCLUSION
Women with repeat CS are at increased risk of having multiple intra-operative surgical complications which increase with each subsequent CS. Pregnant women must be informed of the related risks which may affect counselling regarding possible tubal ligation.Women with repeat CS are at increased risk of having multiple intra-operative surgical complications which increase with each subsequent CS. Pregnant women must be informed of the related risks which may affect counselling regarding possible tubal ligation.

Keyword

Fetal outcome; Intra-operative complications; Multiple cesarean sections; Pregnancy outcome

MeSH Terms

Birth Weight
Cesarean Section*
Emergencies
Female
Gravidity
Hemorrhage
Humans
Hysterectomy
Infant, Newborn
Length of Stay
Placenta
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnant Women
Retrospective Studies
Sterilization, Tubal
Urinary Bladder

Cited by  1 articles

Risk of Emergency Operations, Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes according to the Planned Gestational Age for Cesarean Delivery
Seung Mi Lee, Joong Shin Park, Young Mi Jung, Su Ah Kim, Ji Hyun Ahn, Jina Youm, Chan-Wook Park, Jong Kwan Jun
J Korean Med Sci. 2018;33(7):.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e51.


Reference

1. Rashid M, Rashid RS. Higher order repeat caesarean sections: how safe are five or more? BJOG. 2004; 111:1090–1094.
2. Juntunen K, Makarainen L, Kirkinen P. Outcome after a high number (4-10) of repeated caesarean sections. BJOG. 2004; 111:561–563.
3. Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99:976–980.
4. Kirkinen P. Multiple caesarean sections: outcomes and complications. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988; 95:778–782.
5. Lynch CM, Kearney R, Turner MJ. Maternal morbidity after elective repeat caesarean section after two or more previous procedures. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003; 106:10–13.
6. Miller DA, Chollet JA, Goodwin TM. Clinical risk factors for placenta previa-placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177:210–214.
7. Robson M. Can the high caesarean section rates be reduced?. In : Bonnar J, Dunlop W, editors. Recent advances in obstetrics and gynaecology. Vol. 22. London: Royal Society of Medicine;2003. p. 71–83.
8. Qublan HS, Tahat Y. Multiple cesarean section. The impact on maternal and fetal outcome. Saudi Med J. 2006; 27:210–214.
9. Sobande A, Eskandar M. Multiple repeat caesarean sections: complications and outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006; 28:193–197.
10. Roset E, Boulvain M, Irion O. Nonclosure of the peritoneum during caesarean section: long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003; 108:40–44.
11. Tulandi T, Agdi M, Zarei A, Miner L, Sikirica V. Adhesion development and morbidity after repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201:56.e1–56.e6.
12. Piver MS, Johnston RA Sr. The safety of multiple cesarean sections. Obstet Gynecol. 1969; 34:690–693.
13. Nisenblat V, Barak S, Griness OB, Degani S, Ohel G, Gonen R. Maternal complications associated with multiple cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108:21–26.
14. Uygur D, Gun O, Kelekci S, Ozturk A, Ugur M, Mungan T. Multiple repeat caesarean section: is it safe? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005; 119:171–175.
15. Seidman DS, Paz I, Nadu A, Dollberg S, Stevenson DK, Gale R, et al. Are multiple cesarean sections safe? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994; 57:7–12.
Full Text Links
  • OGS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr