Yonsei Med J.  2013 Mar;54(2):396-402. 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.2.396.

Diagnostic Value and Prognostic Significance of Pleural C-Reactive Protein in Lung Cancer Patients with Malignant Pleural Effusions

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Wonkwang Medical Science, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea.
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Wonkwang Medical Science, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea. kshryj@wonkwang.ac.kr
  • 3Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea.
  • 4Department of Radiology, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
C-reactive protein (CRP) has been implicated in various inflammatory and advanced malignant states. Increased serum CRP (s-CRP) levels have been shown to be associated with independent prognostic factors for survival in patients with advanced lung cancer. However, only few studies have focused on the role of CRP in pleural effusions. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of pleural CRP (p-CRP) in lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion (MPE).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Pleural effusion (PE) samples were collected from patients with MPE (68 lung cancers; 12 extrathoracic tumors), and from 68 patients with various benign conditions (31 with pneumonia; 37 with tuberculosis). Concentrations of p- and s-CRP were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. CRP level in pleural fluid and its association with survival were examined.
RESULTS
p-CRP levels correlated with s-CRP levels (r=0.82, p<0.0001). For the differential diagnosis of MPE and benign PE, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was greater for p-CRP (0.86) than for s-CRP (0.77). High p-CRP expression significantly correlated with shorter overall survival (p=0.006). P-CRP was independent prognostic factor significantly associated with overall survival on multivariated analysis (p=0.0001). The relative risk of death for lung cancer patients with high p-CRP levels was 3.909 (95% confidence interval, 2.000-7.639).
CONCLUSION
P-CRP is superior to s-CRP in determining pleural fluid etiology. Quantitative measurement of p-CRP might be a useful complementary diagnostic and prognostic test for lung cancer patients with MPE.

Keyword

Pleural CRP; diagnosis; prognosis; lung cancer; pleural effusion

MeSH Terms

C-Reactive Protein/*metabolism
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Humans
Lung Neoplasms/*diagnosis/metabolism/pathology
Multivariate Analysis
Pleural Effusion, Malignant/*diagnosis/metabolism/pathology
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Survival Analysis
C-Reactive Protein

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Correlation between p- and s-CRP in PE; r is the Spearman coefficient of correlation. CRP, C-reactive protein; PE, pleural effusion; p-CRP, pleural CRP; s-CRP, serum CRP.

  • Fig. 2 Comparison of p-CRP vs. s-CRP levels in MPE and benign PE. CRP, C-reactive protein; MPE, malignant pleural effusion; PE, pleural effusion; p-CRP, pleural CRP; s-CRP, serum CRP.

  • Fig. 3 Comparison of diagnostic accuracies of p-CRP vs. s-CRP in distinguishing lung cancer with MPE from benign PE, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The numbers in parentheses indicate the diagnostic accuracies (area under the ROC curve). CRP, C-reactive protein; MPE, malignant pleural effusion; PE, pleural effusion; p-CRP, pleural CRP; s-CRP, serum CRP.

  • Fig. 4 Overall survival differences between lung cancer with MPE in high and low p-CRP expression, as determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Patients in the high p-CRP expression group showed reduced overall survival. The p value was obtained from a log-rank test of the difference. CRP, C-reactive protein; MPE, malignant pleural effusion; p-CRP, pleural CRP.


Reference

1. Memon A, Zawadzki ZA. Malignant effusions: diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic strategy. Curr Probl Cancer. 1981. 5:1–30.
Article
2. Postmus PE, Brambilla E, Chansky K, Crowley J, Goldstraw P, Patz EF Jr, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for revision of the M descriptors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2007. 2:686–693.
Article
3. Fiegl M, Massoner A, Steurer M, Grünewald K, Krugmann J, Hack R, et al. Improving tumor cell detection in pleural effusions by interphase cytogenetics. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2003. 55:60–62.
Article
4. Ferrer J, Villarino MA, Encabo G, Felip E, Bermejo B, Vilà S, et al. Diagnostic utility of CYFRA 21-1, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 125, neuron specific enolase, and squamous cell antigen level determinations in the serum and pleural fluid of patients with pleural effusions. Cancer. 1999. 86:1488–1495.
Article
5. Miédougé M, Rouzaud P, Salama G, Pujazon MC, Vincent C, Mauduyt MA, et al. Evaluation of seven tumour markers in pleural fluid for the diagnosis of malignant effusions. Br J Cancer. 1999. 81:1059–1065.
Article
6. Gu P, Huang G, Chen Y, Zhu C, Yuan J, Sheng S. Diagnostic utility of pleural fluid carcinoembryonic antigen and CYFRA 21-1 in patients with pleural effusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Lab Anal. 2007. 21:398–405.
Article
7. Kim HJ, Shin KC, Lee JW, Kim KJ, Hong YH, Chung JH, et al. TNF-alpha in the pleural fluid for the differential diagnosis of tuberculous and malignant effusion. Tuberc Respir Dis. 2005. 59:625–630.
Article
8. Liang QL, Shi HZ, Qin XJ, Liang XD, Jiang J, Yang HB. Diagnostic accuracy of tumour markers for malignant pleural effusion: a meta-analysis. Thorax. 2008. 63:35–41.
Article
9. Duffy MJ. Role of tumor markers in patients with solid cancers: a critical review. Eur J Intern Med. 2007. 18:175–184.
Article
10. Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002. 420:860–867.
Article
11. Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008. 454:436–444.
Article
12. Chiang AC, Massagué J. Molecular basis of metastasis. N Engl J Med. 2008. 359:2814–2823.
Article
13. Mahmoud FA, Rivera NI. The role of C-reactive protein as a prognostic indicator in advanced cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2002. 4:250–255.
Article
14. Pepys MB, Hirschfield GM. C-reactive protein: a critical update. J Clin Invest. 2003. 111:1805–1812.
Article
15. Korppi M, Heiskanen-Kosma T, Leinonen M. White blood cells, C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in pneumococcal pneumonia in children. Eur Respir J. 1997. 10:1125–1129.
Article
16. Smith RP, Lipworth BJ. C-reactive protein in simple community-acquired pneumonia. Chest. 1995. 107:1028–1031.
Article
17. Castaño Vidriales JL, Amores Antequera C. Use of pleural fluid C-reactive protein in laboratory diagnosis of pleural effusions. Eur J Med. 1992. 1:201–207.
18. Yilmaz Turay U, Yildirim Z, Türköz Y, Biber C, Erdoğan Y, Keyf AI, et al. Use of pleural fluid C-reactive protein in diagnosis of pleural effusions. Respir Med. 2000. 94:432–435.
Article
19. Hara M, Matsuzaki Y, Shimuzu T, Tomita M, Ayabe T, Enomoto Y, et al. Preoperative serum C-reactive protein level in non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2007. 27:3001–3004.
20. Pelliniemi TT, Irjala K, Mattila K, Pulkki K, Rajamäki A, Tienhaara A, et al. Finnish Leukemia Group. Immunoreactive interleukin-6 and acute phase proteins as prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Blood. 1995. 85:765–771.
Article
21. Jabs WJ, Busse M, Krüger S, Jocham D, Steinhoff J, Doehn C. Expression of C-reactive protein by renal cell carcinomas and unaffected surrounding renal tissue. Kidney Int. 2005. 68:2103–2110.
Article
22. Nozoe T, Matsumata T, Kitamura M, Sugimachi K. Significance of preoperative elevation of serum C-reactive protein as an indicator for prognosis in colorectal cancer. Am J Surg. 1998. 176:335–338.
Article
23. Hefler LA, Concin N, Hofstetter G, Marth C, Mustea A, Sehouli J, et al. Serum C-reactive protein as independent prognostic variable in patients with ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008. 14:710–714.
Article
24. Hashimoto K, Ikeda Y, Korenaga D, Tanoue K, Hamatake M, Kawasaki K, et al. The impact of preoperative serum C-reactive protein on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 2005. 103:1856–1864.
Article
25. Light RW. Diagnostic principles in pleural disease. Eur Respir J. 1997. 10:476–481.
Article
26. Papageorgiou E, Kostikas K, Kiropoulos T, Karetsi E, Mpatavanis G, Gourgoulianis KI. Increased oxidative stress in exudative pleural effusions: a new marker for the differentiation between exudates and transudates? Chest. 2005. 128:3291–3297.
Article
27. Chierakul N, Kanitsap A, Chaiprasert A, Viriyataveekul R. A simple C-reactive protein measurement for the differentiation between tuberculous and malignant pleural effusion. Respirology. 2004. 9:66–69.
Article
28. Kim DY, Lee YS, Ahn S, Chun YH, Lim KS. The usefulness of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as early diagnostic markers of bacteremia in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. Cancer Res Treat. 2011. 43:176–180.
Article
29. Botana-Rial M, Casado-Rey P, Leiro-Fernández V, Andrade-Olivié M, Represas-Represas C, Fernández-Villar A. Validity of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein measurement when differentiating between benign and malignant pleural effusion. Clin Lab. 2011. 57:373–378.
30. Heikkilä K, Ebrahim S, Lawlor DA. A systematic review of the association between circulating concentrations of C reactive protein and cancer. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007. 61:824–833.
Article
31. Scott HR, McMillan DC, Forrest LM, Brown DJ, McArdle CS, Milroy R. The systemic inflammatory response, weight loss, performance status and survival in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2002. 87:264–267.
Article
32. Søyseth V, Benth JS, Stavem K. The association between hospitalisation for pneumonia and the diagnosis of lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2007. 57:152–158.
Article
33. Brundage MD, Davies D, Mackillop WJ. Prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer: a decade of progress. Chest. 2002. 122:1037–1057.
34. Forrest LM, McMillan DC, McArdle CS, Angerson WJ, Dunlop DJ. Evaluation of cumulative prognostic scores based on the systemic inflammatory response in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2003. 89:1028–1030.
Article
35. O'Dowd C, McRae LA, McMillan DC, Kirk A, Milroy R. Elevated preoperative C-reactive protein predicts poor cancer specific survival in patients undergoing resection for non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2010. 5:988–992.
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr