Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol.  2008 Mar;1(1):35-40. 10.3342/ceo.2008.1.1.35.

Combined 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging for the Initial Evaluation of Glottic Cancer

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. chbaek@skku.edu
  • 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
The primary aim of this study was to determine whether 18F-FDG-PET/CT (PET/CT) scans provide additional diagnostic information in addition to the direct laryngoscopic examination (L/E) and contrast-enhanced CT (CT) in patients with glottic cancer during the initial evaluation. METHODS: Fifty-five consecutive patients with glottic cancer of the larynx that had L/E, CT and PET/CT were enrolled. The diagnostic value of each modality was compared for their accuracy in predicting the extent of the primary tumors on sub-site based analysis and the final tumor staging. The reference standards were either the surgical pathology findings or clinical/radiological follow-up outcome. Changes in patient care based on PET/CT results were compared with the treatment decisions based on L/E with CT. RESULTS: For primary tumor sub-site based analysis, the sensitivity was significantly higher for L/E (92.8%) than for PET/CT (79.4%, P=0.028). The comparisons between L/E vs. CT and CT vs. PET/CT did not reach statistical significance. As an initial tumor-staging method the L/E had a diagnostic accuracy of 76.4%, compared to 61.8% for CT and 41.8% for PET/CT. The L/E and CT were better than the PET/CT (P=0.0009 and 0.049) for the initial TNM staging. PET/CT scanning changed the clinical decision-making based on the L/E with CT results in 12.7% of cases, of whom 5.5% had no additional PET/CT related benefit. CONCLUSION: Conclusion. The results of this study showed that PET/CT imaging added no clinical information benefit compared to the L/E and CT for the initial evaluation of patients with glottic cancer.

Keyword

Positron emission tomography; Tomography; X-ray computed; Laryngoscopy; Laryngeal neoplasms; Glottis

MeSH Terms

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Follow-Up Studies
Glottis
Humans
Laryngeal Neoplasms
Laryngoscopy
Neoplasm Staging
Pathology, Surgical
Patient Care
Positron-Emission Tomography
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18

Figure

  • Fig. 1 A 62-year-old man with glottic squamous cell carcinomas in the left vocal fold. (A) Preoperative laryngoscopy shows irregular surfaced mucosal change confined to the left true vocal fold, suggesting malignant lesions, T1a. (B) The CT scans were interpreted as T1a glottic cancer, based on mucosal irregularity and abnormal contrast enhancement of the left true vocal fold. (C, D) On the PET/CT images, the left epiglottis and vallecula area showed asymmetrical increased uptake of FDG (peak standard uptake value=6.3) suggesting a malignancy, but the faint uptake in the left true vocal fold (peak standard uptake value=2.3) was considered benign. (E) The CT images of the corresponding site also revealed small enhancing lesions of the vallecula, but the radiologist interpreted the lesion as benign changes of the lingual tonsil. The initial tumor staging predicted by PET/CT standalone was supraglottic cancer cT2N0M0. The final surgical pathology demonstrated malignant cells only in the left true vocal fold without extension to supraglottis (T1a).


Cited by  1 articles

Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Laryngeal Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery
Soon-Hyun Ahn, Hyun Jun Hong, Soon Young Kwon, Kee Hwan Kwon, Jong-Lyel Roh, Junsun Ryu, Jun Hee Park, Seung-Kuk Baek, Guk Haeng Lee, Sei Young Lee, Jin Choon Lee, Man Ki Chung, Young Hoon Joo, Yong Bae Ji, Jeong Hun Hah, Minsu Kwon, Young Min Park, Chang Myeon Song, Sung-Chan Shin, Chang Hwan Ryu, Doh Young Lee, Young Chan Lee, Jae Won Chang, Ha Min Jeong, Jae-Keun Cho, Wonjae Cha, Byung Joon Chun, Ik Joon Choi, Hyo Geun Choi, Kang Dae Lee
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;10(1):1-43.    doi: 10.21053/ceo.2016.01389.


Reference

1. Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H, Dahmen G, Mueller SP, Beyer T, et al. Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 11. 01. 22(21):4357–4368. PMID: 15514377.
Article
2. Hany TF, Steinert HC, Goerres GW, Buck A, von Schulthess GK. PET diagnostic accuracy: improvement with in-line PET-CT system: initial results. Radiology. 2002; 11. 225(2):575–581. PMID: 12409597.
Article
3. Lardinois D, Weder W, Hany TF, Kamel EM, Korom S, Seifert B, et al. Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. N Engl J Med. 2003; 6. 19. 348(25):2500–2507. PMID: 12815135.
Article
4. Branstetter BF 4th, Blodgett TM, Zimmer LA, Snyderman CH, Johnson JT, Raman S, et al. Head and neck malignancy: is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone? Radiology. 2005; 5. 235(2):580–586. PMID: 15858097.
Article
5. Schoder H, Yeung HW, Gonen M, Kraus D, Larson SM. Head and neck cancer: clinical usefulness and accuracy of PET/CT image fusion. Radiology. 2004; 4. 231(1):65–72. PMID: 14990824.
Article
6. Jeong HS, Baek CH, Son YI, Chung MK, Lee DK, Choi JY, et al. Use of integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT to improve the accuracy of initial cervical nodal evaluation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2007; 3. 29(3):203–210. PMID: 17111430.
7. Schwartz DL, Ford E, Rajendran J, Yueh B, Coltrera MD, Virgin J, et al. FDG-PET/CT imaging for preradiotherapy staging of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 1. 01. 61(1):129–136. PMID: 15629603.
Article
8. Gordin A, Daitzchman M, Doweck I, Yefremov N, Golz A, Keidar Z, et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in patients with carcinoma of the larynx: diagnostic accuracy and impact on clinical management. Laryngoscope. 2006; 2. 116(2):273–278. PMID: 16467718.
Article
9. McGuirt WF, Greven KM, Keyes JW Jr, Williams DW 3rd, Watson NE Jr, Geisinger KR, et al. Positron emission tomography in the evaluation of laryngeal carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1995; 4. 104(4 Pt 1):274–278. PMID: 7717616.
Article
10. Menda Y, Graham MM. Update on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging of squamous head and neck cancers. Semin Nucl Med. 2005; 10. 35(4):214–219. PMID: 16150243.
Article
11. Zimmer LA, Branstetter BF, Nayak JV, Johnson JT. Current use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Laryngoscope. 2005; 11. 115(11):2029–2034. PMID: 16319618.
Article
12. Som PM. Detection of metastasis in cervical lymph nodes: CT and MR criteria and differential diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992; 5. 158(5):961–969. PMID: 1566697.
Article
13. Jeong HS, Baek CH, Son YI, Choi JY, Kim HJ, Ko YH, et al. Integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT for the initial evaluation of cervical node level of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: comparison with ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006; 9. 65(3):402–407. PMID: 16918964.
14. Wang CC, Efird JT. Does prolonged treatment course adversely affect local control of carcinoma of the larynx? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994; 7. 01. 29(4):657–660. PMID: 8040011.
Article
15. Adams GL. Cummings C, Fredrickson J, Harker L, Krause C, Schuller D, Richardson M, editors. Malignant tumors of the larynx and hypopharynx. Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. 1998. St. Louis, USA: Mosby-Year Book Inc.;p. 2130–2143.
Full Text Links
  • CEO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr