1. Mues AC, Palacios JM, Haramis G, Casazza C, Badani K, Gupta M, et al. Contemporary experience in the management of angiomyolipoma. J Endourol. 2010. 24:1883–1886.
2. Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Ernst RD, Tamm EP, Goldman SM, Fishman EK. CT evaluation of renovascular disease. Radiographics. 2000. 20:1321–1340.
3. Bissler JJ, Kingswood JC. Renal angiomyolipomata. Kidney Int. 2004. 66:924–934.
4. Sherman JL, Hartman DS, Friedman AC, Madewell JE, Davis CJ, Goldman SM. Angiomyolipoma: computed tomographic-pathologic correlation of 17 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981. 137:1221–1226.
5. Halpenny D, Snow A, McNeill G, Torreggiani WC. The radiological diagnosis and treatment of renal angiomyolipoma-current status. Clin Radiol. 2010. 65:99–108.
6. Kochhar R, Brown RK, Wong CO, Dunnick NR, Frey KA, Manoharan P. Role of FDG PET/CT in imaging of renal lesions. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2010. 54:347–357.
7. Zapardiel I, Delafuente-Valero J, Bajo-Arenas JM. Renal angiomyolipoma during pregnancy: review of the literature. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011. 72:217–219.
8. Lhommel R, Annet L, Bol A, Gigot JF, Sempoux C, Mathieu I, et al. PET scan with 11C-acetate for the imaging of liver masses: report of a false positive case. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005. 32:629.
9. Ho CL, Chan WK, Chen S, Leung YL, Cheng TK. Education and Imaging. Hepatobiliary and pancreatic: imaging for hepatic angiomyolipoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010. 25:1589.
10. Arnold RT, Myers DT. Visualization of renal angiomyolipoma on F-18 FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2009. 34:539–540.
11. Lemaitre L, Claudon M, Dubrulle F, Mazeman E. Imaging of angiomyolipomas. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1997. 18:100–114.
12. Davenport MS, Neville AM, Ellis JH, Cohan RH, Chaudhry HS, Leder RA. Diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma with hounsfield unit thresholds: effect of size of region of interest and nephrographic phase imaging. Radiology. 2011. 260:158–165.
13. Namura K, Minamimoto R, Yao M, Makiyama K, Murakami T, Sano F, et al. Impact of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) evaluated by 18-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) on survival for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a preliminary report. BMC Cancer. 2010. 10:667.
14. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007. 57:43–66.
15. Bachor R, Kotzerke J, Gottfried HW, Brändle E, Reske SN, Hautmann R. [Positron emission tomography in diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma]. Urologe A. 1996. 35:146–150.
16. Kang DE, White RL Jr, Zuger JH, Sasser HC, Teigland CM. Clinical use of fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography for detection of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2004. 171:1806–1809.
17. Aide N, Cappele O, Bottet P, Bensadoun H, Regeasse A, Comoz F, et al. Efficiency of [(18)F]FDG PET in characterising renal cancer and detecting distant metastases: a comparison with CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003. 30:1236–1245.
18. Martínez de Llano SR, Delgado-Bolton RC, Jiménez-Vicioso A, Pérez-Castejón MJ, Carreras Delgado JL, Ramos E, et al. [Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET in renal cell carcinoma]. Rev Esp Med Nucl. 2007. 26:19–29.
19. Edinger AL, Linardic CM, Chiang GG, Thompson CB, Abraham RT. Differential effects of rapamycin on mammalian target of rapamycin signaling functions in mammalian cells. Cancer Res. 2003. 63:8451–8460.
20. Jiang X, Kenerson H, Aicher L, Miyaoka R, Eary J, Bissler J, et al. The tuberous sclerosis complex regulates trafficking of glucose transporters and glucose uptake. Am J Pathol. 2008. 172:1748–1756.