Korean J Orthod.  2008 Feb;38(1):52-59. 10.4041/kjod.2008.38.1.52.

Skeletal maturation associated with the fourth cervical vertebra and menarcheal timing

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthodontics, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Korea. dentpark64@hanmail.net
  • 2Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Korea.
  • 3Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
This study analyzed the morphologic changes of the fourth cervical vertebra body to determine the skeletal age of orthodntic patients during growth.
METHODS
Eighty-one female patients aged from 11 to 14 who had cephalograms taken on the same day were examined. The subjects were divided into three groups depending on the depth of the concavity of the lower border of the fourth cervical vertebra (Group A: less than 1.05 mm, Group B: 1.05 - 2.07 mm, Group C: greater than 2.07 mm). Menarcheal timing, SMI stage, length, width and ratio of length and width of the fourth cervical vertebra body were analyzed and the following results were obtained.
RESULTS
The average SMI stage of group A,B and C were 5.67 +/- 2.57, 8.73 +/- 2.41, and 10.00 +/- 1.47, respectively. Length, width, ratio of length and width, and SMI stage were greater in group B than group A and in group C than group B. Mean menarcheal timing was 11.64 +/- 0.92 years. Concavity depth, length, width, ratio of length and width showed a significant positive correlation with SMI stage, especially with the concavity depth.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study propose a simple method for determining the timing of orthopedic treatment by measuring the concavity depth of the fourth cervical vertebra on the cephalogram.

Keyword

Cervical vertebra; Hand-wrist; Menarche; Skeletal maturation

MeSH Terms

Aged
Female
Humans
Menarche
Orthopedics
Spine

Figure

  • Fig 1 Measurements of the 4th cervical vertebra.

  • Fig 2 Scattergram of concavity of 4th cervical vertebra and hand-wrist stage; *p < 0.01.


Cited by  4 articles

Skeletal maturation evaluation using mandibular third molar development in adolescents
Sun-Mi Cho, Chung-Ju Hwang
Korean J Orthod. 2009;39(2):120-129.    doi: 10.4041/kjod.2009.39.2.120.

Menarcheal timing and growth curve shape during the adolescent growth spurt
Yong-soo Ahn, Ki-Soo Lee, Jong-Hyun Nam, Yoon-Goo Kang
Korean J Orthod. 2009;39(3):159-167.    doi: 10.4041/kjod.2009.39.3.159.

The relationship between upper airway width and facial growth changes in orthodontic treatment of growing children
Yoon-Ji Kim, Gyoo-Suk Bok, Kyu-Hong Lee, Yong-In Hwang, Yang-Ho Park
Korean J Orthod. 2009;39(3):168-176.    doi: 10.4041/kjod.2009.39.3.168.

Maturation of cervical vertebrae in relation to menarche
Jin-Hwa Lee, Yoon-Goo Kang, Ki-Soo Lee, Jong-Hyun Nam
Korean J Orthod. 2009;39(1):28-35.    doi: 10.4041/kjod.2009.39.1.28.


Reference

1. Bjork A, Helm S. Prediction of the age of maximum pubertal growth in body height. Angle orthod. 1967. 37:134–143.
2. Cha DS, Cha KS. A study on the comparisons between dental calcification and skeletal maturity. Korean J Orthod. 1994. 24:841–849.
3. Baume RM, Buschang PH, Weinstein S. Stature, head height and growth of the vertical face. Am J Orthod. 1983. 83:477–484.
Article
4. Demirijian A, Buschang PH, Tanguay R, Patterson DK. Inter relationships among measures of somatic, skeletal, dental, and sexual maturity. Am J Orthod. 1985. 88:433–438.
5. Chapman SM. Ossification of the adductor sesamoid and the adolescent growth spurt. Angle Orthod. 1972. 42:236–244.
6. Liliequst B, Lundburg M. A methodological investigation. Acta Radio. 1971. 11:97–112.
7. Nanda SK. Prediction of facial growth using different biologic criteria in females. Craniofacial Growth Series, 20. 1986. Center for Human Growth and Development. Univ. of Michigan.
8. Lamparski DG. Skeletal age assessment utilizing cervical vertebrae. Master of dental thesis Pittsburgh Univ of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine. 1972.
Article
9. Hassel B, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995. 107:58–66.
Article
10. Fishman LS. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation; a clinically oriented method based on hand wrist films. Angle Orthod. 1982. 52:88–112.
11. Garcia-Fernandez P, Torre H, Flores L, Rea J. The cervical vertebrae as maturational indicators. J Clin Orthod. 1998. 32:221–225.
12. Krogman WM. The meaningful interpretation of growth and growth data by the clinician. Am J Orthod. 1958. 44:411–432.
Article
13. Mito T, Sato K, Mitani H. Cervical vertebral bone age in girls. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002. 122:380–385.
Article
14. Bjork A. Sutural growth of the upper face studied by the implant method. Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc. 1964. 40:49–65.
Article
15. Gandini P, Mancini M, Andreani F. A comparison of hand-wrist bone and cervical vertebral analyses in measuring skeletal maturation. Angle Orthod. 2006. 76:984–989.
Article
16. San Roman P, Palma JC, Oteo MD, Nevado E. Skeletal maturation determined by cervical vertebrae development. Eur J Orthod. 2002. 24:303–311.
Article
17. Chang YH, Chung KR. The study on the relationship between the menarche and the bone maturity of malocclusion group. Korean J Orthod. 1995. 25:415–423.
Full Text Links
  • KJOD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr