J Korean Soc Radiol.  2012 Mar;66(3):239-245. 10.3348/jksr.2012.66.3.239.

Safety of Carotid Artery Stenting in Elderly Patients with Severe Carotid Artery Stenosis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea. radyoon@jnu.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
To determine the safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) using an emboli-protection device in elderly patients with severe carotid artery stenosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ninety consecutive patients who were at high risk for carotid endarterectomy underwent protected CAS using an emboli-protection device. Patients were divided into two groups by age: < 70 and > or = 70. The primary outcome measure was the combined incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and death within 30 days of CAS. The secondary outcome measures were technical success and hyperperfusion syndrome. Associations between age and the clinical outcomes were investigated.
RESULTS
Overall, 30-day stroke, MI, and death rates were 6.7%. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between the older age group (n = 56) and younger age group (n = 34) (8.9% and 2.9%, respectively; HR for age > or = 70, 1.141; 95% CI, 0.875 to 1.488, p = 0.331). A logistic regression showed there was no independent variable associated with primary outcome. Technical success was achieved in all patients and there was no significant difference in the incidence of hyperperfusion syndrome between the two age groups.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study suggest that protected CAS seems to be safe in elderly patients with severe carotid artery stenosis.


MeSH Terms

Aged
Angioplasty
Carotid Arteries
Carotid Stenosis
Endarterectomy, Carotid
Humans
Incidence
Logistic Models
Myocardial Infarction
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Stents
Stroke

Reference

1. Brott TG, Hobson RW 2nd, Howard G, Roubin GS, Clark WM, Brooks W, et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2010. 363:11–23.
2. Furie KL, Kasner SE, Adams RJ, Albers GW, Bush RL, Fagan SC, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke. 2011. 42:227–276.
3. Hobson RW 2nd, Howard VJ, Roubin GS, Brott TG, Ferguson RD, Popma JJ, et al. Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase. J Vasc Surg. 2004. 40:1106–1111.
4. Zahn R, Ischinger T, Hochadel M, Zeymer U, Schmalz W, Treese N, et al. Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians: results from the ALKK Carotid Artery Stent (CAS) Registry. Eur Heart J. 2007. 28:370–375.
5. Bonati LH, Fraedrich G. Carotid Stenting Trialists' Collaboration. Age modifies the relative risk of stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis--a pooled analysis of EVA-3S, SPACE and ICSS. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011. 41:153–158.
6. Stanziale SF, Marone LK, Boules TN, Brimmeier JA, Hill K, Makaroun MS, et al. Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians is associated with increased adverse outcomes. J Vasc Surg. 2006. 43:297–304.
7. Chiam PT, Roubin GS, Iyer SS, Green RM, Soffer DE, Brennan C, et al. Carotid artery stenting in elderly patients: importance of case selection. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008. 72:318–324.
8. Grant A, White C, Ansel G, Bacharach M, Metzger C, Velez C. Safety and efficacy of carotid stenting in the very elderly. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010. 75:651–655.
9. Velez CA, White CJ, Reilly JP, Jenkins JS, Collins TJ, Grise MA, et al. Carotid artery stent placement is safe in the very elderly (> or = 80 years). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008. 72:303–308.
10. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel GJ, et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2004. 351:1493–1501.
11. Adams RJ, Albers G, Alberts MJ, Benavente O, Furie K, Goldstein LB, et al. Update to the AHA/ASA recommendations for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack. Stroke. 2008. 39:1647–1652.
12. Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J, Peto C, Peto R, Potter J, et al. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004. 363:1491–1502.
13. Abou-Chebl A, Yadav JS, Reginelli JP, Bajzer C, Bhatt D, Krieger DW. Intracranial hemorrhage and hyperperfusion syndrome following carotid artery stenting: risk factors, prevention, and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004. 43:1596–1601.
14. Ogasawara K, Sakai N, Kuroiwa T, Hosoda K, Iihara K, Toyoda K, et al. Intracranial hemorrhage associated with cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome following carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting: retrospective review of 4494 patients. J Neurosurg. 2007. 107:1130–1136.
15. van Lammeren GW, Reichmann BL, Moll FL, Bots ML, de Kleijn DP, de Vries JP, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability as an explanation for the increased risk of stroke in elderly undergoing carotid artery stenting. Stroke. 2011. 42:2550–2555.
16. Setacci C, de Donato G, Chisci E, Setacci F, Pieraccini M, Cappelli A, et al. Is carotid artery stenting in octogenarians really dangerous? J Endovasc Ther. 2006. 13:302–309.
17. Safian RD, Bresnahan JF, Jaff MR, Foster M, Bacharach JM, Maini B, et al. Protected carotid stenting in high-risk patients with severe carotid artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006. 47:2384–2389.
18. Thomas DJ. Protected carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients reflections from SAPPHIRE. Stroke. 2005. 36:912–913.
Full Text Links
  • JKSR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr