J Korean Med Sci.  2012 Jun;27(6):579-585. 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.6.579.

The Gap Between Physicians and the Public in Satisfaction with the National Health Insurance System in Korea

• Kim KH
• Park EC
• Hahm MI

• KMID: 1421608
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2012.27.6.579

Abstract

The Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) system was an unprecedented accomplishment that was achieved in a short period of time. In this study, we sought to identify gaps between physicians and the public with respect to attitudes toward the NHI system in Korea. The study population was derived from the 2008 Korean Medical Association Survey, which was conducted to investigate satisfaction with and perceptions of the NHI system among physicians (n = 961) and the public (n = 935). Only 6.5% of the physicians were satisfied with NHI system, and 71.5% were dissatisfied with it. In contrast, 28.3% of the public were satisfied with the NHI system, and 21.4% were dissatisfied. The level of dissatisfaction expressed by physicians (2.03 +/- 0.91 on a five-point scale) was also higher than that expressed by the public (3.06 +/- 0.84). Despite rapid growth of NHI system, a large gap in satisfaction exists between physicians and the public.

Keyword

Satisfaction; Physician; Health System; National Health Insurance

MeSH Terms

Adult
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
National Health Programs/*statistics & numerical data
*Personal Satisfaction
Physicians/*psychology
Republic of Korea

Reference

1. Kwon S. Thirty years of national health insurance in South Korea: lessons for achieving universal health care coverage. Health Policy Plan. 2009. 24:63–71.

2. Lee GS. 30 year-history of Korean National Health Insurance. Res Inst Healthcare Policy Korean Med Assoc. 2007. 5:72–80.

3. Moon OR. A Study on problem and improvement of National Health Insurance system in Korea. 2005. Seoul: Korean Medical Association.

4. Jeong HS. Health care reform and change in public-private mix of financing: a Korean case. Health Policy. 2005. 74:133–145.

5. NHI. 2007 National health insurance program of Korea. 2007. National Health Insurance Corporation.

6. Donelan K, Blendon RJ, Benson J, Leitman R, Taylor H. All payer, single payer, managed care, no payer: patients' perspectives in three nations. Health Aff (Millwood). 1996. 15:254–265.

7. Blendon RJ, Schoen C, Donelan K, Osborn R, DesRoches CM, Scoles K, Davis K, Binns K, Zapert K. Physicians' views on quality of care: a five country comparison. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001. 20:233–243.

8. Blendon RJ, Leitman R, Morrison I, Donelan K. Satisfaction with health systems in ten nations. Health Aff (Millwood). 1990. 9:185–192.

9. Grembowski D, Paschane D, Diehr P, Katon W, Martin D, Patrick DL. Managed care, physician job satisfaction, and the quality of primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2005. 20:271–277.

10. Linzer M, Konrad TR, Douglas J, McMurray JE, Pathman DE, Williams ES, Schwartz MD, Gerrity M, Scheckler W, Bigby JA, et al. Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the physician worklife study. J Gen Intern Med. 2000. 15:441–450.

11. Landon BE, Reschovsky J, Blumenthal D. Changes in career satisfaction among primary care and specialist physicians, 1997-2001. JAMA. 2003. 289:442–449.

12. Yoon HG, Yoon SJ, Hwang IK, Moon YB, Lee HY. Job satisfaction, subjective class identification and associated factors of professional socialization in Korean physicians. J Prev Med Public Health. 2008. 41:30–38.

13. Isett KR, Ellis AR, Topping S, Morrissey JP. Managed care and provider satisfaction in mental health settings. Community Ment Health J. 2009. 45:209–221.

14. Kim HJ, Koh Y, Chun EJ, Jang SR, Kim CY. Subjective satisfaction with medical care among older people: comprehensiveness, general satisfaction and accessibility. J Prev Med Public Health. 2009. 42:35–41.

15. Stoddard JJ, Hargraves L, Reed M, Vratil A. Managed care, professional autonomy, and income: effects on physician career satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med. 2001. 16:675–684.

16. Bovier PA, Perneger TV. Predictors of work satisfaction among physicians. Eur J Public Health. 2003. 13:299–305.

17. Cho BH. A study on professionalism and job satisfaction in doctors who practice in Korea. Korean J Sociol. 1994. 28:37–64.

18. Qian F, Lim MK. Professional satisfaction among Singapore physicians. Health Policy. 2008. 85:363–371.

19. Murray A, Montgomery JE, Chang H, Rogers WH, Inui T, Safran DG. Doctor discontent. A comparison of physician satisfaction in different delivery system settings, 1986 and 1997. J Gen Intern Med. 2001. 16:452–459.

20. Lee YL, Chun CB, Lee GL, SEO NG. Survey on satisfaction with NHI Program in Korea. 2007. National Health Insurance Corporation.

21. Kim WJ. Comparative study on the determinants of job satisfaction between self-employed and salaried physicians in Korea. Graduate School of Health and Environment. 2009. Seoul: Yonsei University.

22. Kim KY. A study on the introduction of contract system: focused on the NHI system. 2008. Seoul: Research Institute for Healthcare Policy.

23. Lee HY, Park SE, Park EC, Hahm MI, Cho WH. Job satisfaction and trust in health insurance review agency among Korean physicians. Health Policy. 2008. 87:249–257.

24. Zifko-Baliga GM, Krampf RF. Managing perceptions of hospital quality. Negative emotional evaluations can undermine even the best clinical quality. Mark Health Serv. 1997. 17:28–35.

25. Seo NG, Moon SW, Lee YG, Hong SY, Kang CG. The survey for satisfaction of NHI system in Korea. 2007. Seoul: National Health Insurance Cooperation.

26. Buciuniene I, Blazeviciene A, Bliudziute E. Health care reform and job satisfaction of primary health care physicians in Lithuania. BMC Fam Pract. 2005. 6:10.

27. Kim GJ. The principles of policy science. 1997. Seoul: Dae Myung.

28. Lee SY, Chun CB, Lee YG, Seo NK. The National Health Insurance system as one type of new typology: the case of South Korea and Taiwan. Health Policy. 2008. 85:105–113.

29. Lee KS. Review of debate over the expansion of public medical facilities to enhance the public role in the medical care sector. Korean J Health Policy Adm. 2001. 11:107–130.