1. Oberg K, Castellano D. Current knowledge on diagnosis and staging of neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2011. 30:Suppl 1. 3–7.
2. Albores-Saavedra J, Gersell D, Gilks CB, Henson DE, Lindberg G, Santiago H, et al. Terminology of endocrine tumors of the uterine cervix: results of a workshop sponsored by the College of American Pathologists and the National Cancer Institute. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997. 121:34–39.
3. Sato Y, Shimamoto T, Amada S, Asada Y, Hayashi T. Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a clinicopathological study of six cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2003. 22:226–230.
4. Krivak TC, McBroom JW, Sundborg MJ, Crothers B, Parker MF. Large cell neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma: a report of two cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2001. 82:187–191.
5. Reig Castillejo A, Membrive Conejo I, Foro Arnalot P, Rodríguez de Dios N, Algara López M. Neuroendocrine small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Clin Transl Oncol. 2010. 12:512–513.
6. McCusker ME, Coté TR, Clegg LX, Tavassoli FJ. Endocrine tumors of the uterine cervix: incidence, demographics, and survival with comparison to squamous cell carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2003. 88:333–339.
7. Wang KL, Yang YC, Wang TY, Chen JR, Chen TC, Chen HS, et al. Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a clinicopathologic retrospective study of 31 cases with prognostic implications. J Chemother. 2006. 18:209–216.
8. Chung HH, Nam BH, Kim JW, Kang KW, Park NH, Song YS, et al. Preoperative [18F]FDG PET/CT maximum standardized uptake value predicts recurrence of uterine cervical cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010. 37:1467–1473.
9. Nakamura K, Okumura Y, Kodama J, Hongo A, Kanazawa S, Hiramatsu Y. The predictive value of measurement of SUVmax and SCC-antigen in patients with pretreatment of primary squamous cell carcinoma of cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 2010. 119:81–86.
10. Yilmaz M, Adli M, Celen Z, Zincirkeser S, Dirier A. FDG PET-CT in cervical cancer: relationship between primary tumor FDG uptake and metastatic potential. Nucl Med Commun. 2010. 31:526–531.
11. Jhingran A, Levenback C. Katz VL, Lentz GM, Lobo RA, Gershenson DM, editors. Malignagnt diseases of the cervix: microinvasive and invasive carcinoma: diagnosis and management. Comprehensive Gynecology. 2007. 5th ed. Philadelpia, PA: Mosby Elsevier.
12. Henriksen E. The lymphatic spread of carcinoma of the cervix and of the body of the uterus; a study of 420 necropsies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1949. 58:924–942.
13. Yang DH, Kim JK, Kim KW, Bae SJ, Kim KH, Cho KS. MRI of small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004. 182:1255–1258.
14. Okamoto Y, Tanaka YO, Nishida M, Tsunoda H, Yoshikawa H, Itai Y. MR imaging of the uterine cervix: imaging-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2003. 23:425–445. quiz 534-535.
15. Yen TC, Ng KK, Ma SY, Chou HH, Tsai CS, Hsueh S, et al. Value of dual-phase 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003. 21:3651–3658.
16. Unger JB, Lilien DL, Caldito G, Ivy JJ, Charrier A, Bellaire B. The prognostic value of pretreatment 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography scan in women with cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007. 17:1062–1067.
17. Waggoner SE. Cervical cancer. Lancet. 2003. 361:2217–2225.
18. Trinh XB, Bogers JJ, Van Marck EA, Tjalma WA. Treatment policy of neuroendocrine small cell cancer of the cervix. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2004. 25:40–44.
19. Belhocine TZ. 18F-FDG PET imaging in posttherapy monitoring of cervical cancers: from diagnosis to prognosis. J Nucl Med. 2004. 45:1602–1604.
20. Pallardy A, Bodet-Milin C, Oudoux A, Campion L, Bourbouloux E, Sagan C, et al. Clinical and survival impact of FDG PET in patients with suspicion of recurrent cervical carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010. 37:1270–1278.