Clin Orthop Surg.  2012 Jun;4(2):117-120. 10.4055/cios.2012.4.2.117.

The Conversion Rate of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty after a Hip Fracture to a Total Hip Arthroplasty

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University College Hospital, London, UK. salazzawi2@gmail.com
  • 2Department of Radiology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
  • 3Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty is used in the management of fractures of the proximal femur. The dual articulation is cited as advantageous in comparison to unipolar prostheses as it decreases acetabular erosion, has a lower dislocation rates and is easier to convert to a total hip arthroplasty (THA) should the need arise. However, these claims are debatable. Our study examines the rate of conversion of the bipolar hemiarthroplasty to THA and the justification for using it on the basis of future conversion to THA.
METHODS
All cases of bipolar hemiarthroplasty performed in our unit for hip fractures over a 9-year period (1999-2007) were reviewed. Medical notes and radiographs of all patients were reviewed, and all surviving patients that were contactable received a telephone follow-up.
RESULTS
Of all 164 patients reviewed with a minimum of 1 year from date of surgery, 4 patients had undergone a conversion of their bipolar prosthesis to THA. Three conversions were performed for infection, dislocation, and fracture. Only one (0.6%) conversion was performed for groin pain.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study show that bipolar hemiarthroplasties for hip fractures have a low conversion rate to THAs and this is comparable to the published conversion rate of unipolar hemiarthroplasties.

Keyword

Hip fracture; Bipolar arthroplasty; Total hip arthroplasty

MeSH Terms

Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/*methods
Female
Hemiarthroplasty/*methods
Hip Fractures/*surgery
Humans
Male
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome

Reference

1. Elliott J. How best to fix an unstable intertrochanteric fracture? Who should have a total hip replacement for the displaced intracapsular hip fracture? [Internet]. 2007. cited 2012 Mar 20. Trauma and Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Specialist Libraries;Available form: https://www.evidence.nhs.uk/.
2. Nikolaou VS, Papathanasopoulos A, Giannoudis PV. What's new in the management of proximal femoral fractures? Injury. 2008. 39(12):1309–1318.
Article
3. Keating JF, Grant A, Masson M, Scott NW, Forbes JF. Displaced intracapsular hip fractures in fit, older people: a randomised comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. Health Technol Assess. 2005. 9(41):iii–iv. ix–x. 1–65.
Article
4. Pellegrini VD Jr, Heiges BA, Bixler B, Lehman EB, Davis CM 3rd. Minimum ten-year results of primary bipolar hip arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006. 88(8):1817–1825.
Article
5. Miller D, Choksey A, Jones P, Perkins R. Medium to long term results of the Exeter bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in active, independent patients: 5-13 year follow-up. Hip Int. 2008. 18(4):301–306.
Article
6. Cornell CN, Levine D, O'Doherty J, Lyden J. Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998. (348):67–71.
Article
7. Ong BC, Maurer SG, Aharonoff GB, Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ. Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty: functional outcome after femoral neck fracture at a minimum of thirty-six months of follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2002. 16(5):317–322.
Article
8. Raia FJ, Chapman CB, Herrera MF, Schweppe MW, Michelsen CB, Rosenwasser MP. Unipolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003. (414):259–265.
Article
9. Rowe SM, Chung JY, Moon ES, Yoon TR, Seo HY, Lee JJ. Why does outer joint motion predominate in bipolar hip prosthesis? Experimental and clinical studies. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004. 75(6):701–707.
Article
10. Varley J, Parker MJ. Stability of hip hemiarthroplasties. Int Orthop. 2004. 28(5):274–277.
Article
11. Homesley HD, Minnich JM, Parvizi J, Hozack WJ. Total hip arthroplasty revision: a decade of change. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2004. 33(8):389–392.
12. Diwanji SR, Kim SK, Seon JK, Park SJ, Yoon TR. Clinical results of conversion total hip arthroplasty after failed bipolar hemiarthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008. 23(7):1009–1015.
Article
13. Tanous T, Stephenson KW, Grecula MJ. Hip hemiarthroplasty after displaced femoral neck fracture: a survivorship analysis. Orthopedics. 2010. 33(6):385.
Article
14. Wachtl SW, Jakob RP, Gautier E. Ten-year patient and prosthesis survival after unipolar hip hemiarthroplasty in female patients over 70 years old. J Arthroplasty. 2003. 18(5):587–591.
Article
15. van den Bekerom MP, Hilverdink EF, Sierevelt IN, et al. A comparison of hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck: a randomised controlled multicentre trial in patients aged 70 years and over. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010. 92(10):1422–1428.
16. Georgiou G, Siapkara A, Dimitrakopoulou A, Provelengios S, Dounis E. Dissociation of bipolar hemiarthroplasty of the hip after dislocation: a report of five different cases and review of literature. Injury. 2006. 37(2):162–168.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CIOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr