Korean J Urol.  2008 Nov;49(11):981-985. 10.4111/kju.2008.49.11.981.

The Incidence and Risk Factors for Inguinal Hernia after Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. eslee@snu.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for developing an inguinal hernia after undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy(RRP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We retrospectively investigated the hospital records of 382 patients who underwent RRP and who were followed over 12 month periods at our institute between January 2000 and December 2006. All the operations were performed by a single surgeon. The clinical and pathological parameters were compared between the patients with and without inguinal hernia, and the risk factors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS
The mean age of the patients was 64.6 years(range, 40 to 83). 32(8.3%) of the 382 patients developed an inguinal hernia at a mean time of 14 months. 8(25.8%) of 32 patients developed an inguinal hernia within 6 months, 23(61.8%) within 1 year, 26(83.9%) within 2 years and 28 (90.3%) developed an inguinal hernia within 3 years. 25(78.1%) developed an inguinal hernia in the right side, 3(9.4%) in left and 4(12.5%) developed an inguinal hernia in both sides. The operative time(p<0.001), prostate volume(p=0.001), the presence of transfusion (p=0.001) and pelvic lymph node dissection(p=0.007) were significantly different between the patients with and without inguinal hernia. Multivariate analysis showed that the operative time(p=0.039), pelvic lymph node dissection(p=0.002), the presence of transfusion(p=0.012) and the prostate volume(>50cc, p=0.012) were independent predictors for post-prostatectomy inguinal hernia.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of our study show that the duration of surgery, pelvic lymph node dissection, the presence of transfusion and the prostate volume all increase the risk of post-radical retropubic prostatectomy inguinal hernia.

Keyword

Radical retropubic prostatectomy; Inguinal hernia; Incidence rate; Risk factors

MeSH Terms

Incidence
Risk Factors

Reference

References

1. Hautmann RE, Sauter TW, Wenderoth UK. Radical retropubic prostatectomy: morbidity and urinary continence in 418 consecutive cases. Urology. 1994; 43:47–51.
Article
2. Fowler FJ Jr, Barry MJ, Lu-Yao G, Roman A, Wasson J, Wennberg JE. Patient-reported complications and follow-up treatment after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 1993; 42:622–9.
3. Regan TC, Mordkin RM, Constantinople NL, Spence IJ, Dejter SW Jr. Incidence of inguinal hernias following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 1996; 47:536–7.
Article
4. Fischer E, Wantz GE. Radical retropubic prostatectomy and groin hernia-cause and effect? Hernia. 1997; 1:67–9.
Article
5. Stranne J, Hugosson J, Iversen P, Morris T, Lodding P. Inguinal hernia in stage M0 prostate cancer: a comparison of incidence in men treated with and without radical retropubic prostatectomy-an analysis of 1,105 patients. Urology. 2005; 65:847–51.
Article
6. Twu CM, Ou YC, Yang CR, Cheng CL, Ho HC. Predicting risk factors for inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2005; 66:814–8.
Article
7. Nomura T, Mimata H, Kitamura H, Fujikura Y, Akita Y, Yamasaki M, et al. Lower incidence of inguinal hernia: minilaparotomy radical retropubic prostatectomy compared with conventional technique. A preliminary report. Urol Int. 2005; 74:32–7.
8. Tsai PJ, Yu CC, Lee YH, Huang JK. Inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy: experience of Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital. J Chin Med Assoc. 2004; 67:141–4.
9. Ichioka K, Yoshimura K, Utsunomiya N, Ueda N, Matsui Y, Terai A, et al. High incidence of inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2004; 63:278–81.
Article
10. Stranne J, Hugosson J, Lodding P. Postradical retropubic prostatectomy inguinal hernia: an analysis of risk factors with special reference to preoperative inguinal hernia morbidity and pelvic lymph node dissection. J Urol. 2006; 176:2072–6.
Article
11. Lodding P, Bergdahl C, Nyberg M, Pileblad E, Stranne J, Hugosson J. Inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a study of incidence and risk factors in comparison to no operation and lymphadenectomy. J Urol. 2001; 166:964–7.
Article
12. Abe T, Shinohara N, Harabayashi T, Sazawa A, Suzuki S, Kawarada Y, et al. Postoperative inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urology. 2007; 69:326–9.
Article
13. Rutkow IM. Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin North Am. 2003; 83:1045–51.
Article
14. Nehme AE. Groin hernias in elderly patients. Management and prognosis. Am J Surg. 1983; 146:257–60.
15. Eubanks WS. Hernias. Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL, editors. editors.SABISTON textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice. 16th ed.Philadelphia: Saunders;2001. p. 783–801.
16. Stranne J, Hugosson J, Lodding P. Inguinal hernia is a common complication in lower midline incision surgery. Hernia. 2007; 11:247–52.
Article
17. Scott J. Development of inguinal hernia following appendectomy. Ill Med J. 1960; 117:344–5.
18. Ichioka K, Kohei N, Yoshimura K, Arai Y, Terai A. Impact of retraction of vas deferens in postradical prostatectomy inguinal hernia. Urology. 2007; 70:511–4.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJU
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr