Clin Orthop Surg.  2012 Mar;4(1):66-71. 10.4055/cios.2012.4.1.66.

Progression of a Fracture Site Impaction as a Prognostic Indicator of Impacted Femoral Neck Fracture Treated with Multiple Pinning

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. oskim@snu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
We evaluated the clinical and radiologic results of impacted femoral neck fractures treated with multiple pinning and determined the influence of the progression of impaction at the fracture site on clinical outcome.
METHODS
There were 34 patients with a mean age of 65.5 years. The mean follow-up period was 3.4 years. Progression of fracture site impaction was measured using an articulo-trochanteric distance index and the percentage decrease in the articulo-trochanteric distance index between follow-up intervals. The failure of treatment was clarified as non-union and avascular necrosis. Other characteristics of the patients, including mean waiting time for surgery, preoperative Singh index score, and body mass index, were also measured to evaluate the influence on the clinical outcome of surgery.
RESULTS
There were 6 fractures which were not treated successfully (3 non-union, 8.8% and 3 avascular necrosis, 8.8%). The mean percentage decrease of the articulo-trochanteric distance index within the first 6 weeks after surgery was 4.5% in the successful group and 25.1% in the failure group (p < 0.001). There was also a significant mean percentage decrease in the articulo-trochanteric distance index between 6 weeks and 3 months (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Primary stabilization with Knowles pins for impacted femoral neck fractures had a reasonable clinical outcome with low morbidity. Despite a significant difference of a mean percentage decrease in the articulo-trochanteric distance index between the successful group and the failure group, we could not verify it as a risk factor for failure of treatment because the odds ratio was not statistically significant.

Keyword

Impacted femoral neck fractures; Fracture fixation; Treatment outcome

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Nails
Female
Femoral Neck Fractures/complications/radiography/*surgery
Femur Head Necrosis/etiology/radiography
Follow-Up Studies
*Fracture Fixation, Internal
Fractures, Ununited/radiography
Hip Joint/*pathology/radiography
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Odds Ratio
Treatment Outcome

Figure

  • Fig. 1 The fractures were classified as valgus (A) or varus (B) based on the location of the impaction and the alignment of femoral head trabeculae on plain anteroposterior radiographs.

  • Fig. 2 Articulo-trochanteric distance (a) is determined by two lines, a line perpendicular to the anatomic axis of the femur through the superiormost aspect of the femoral head and a line parallel to line 1 through the superiormost aspect of the greater trochanter.

  • Fig. 3 Plain radiographs show preoperative valgus-impacted fracture (A) and progressive fracture site impaction 6 weeks postoperative (B). The articulo-trochanteric (ATD) index is determined by the ATD of the affected side (b, d) divided by the ATD of the unaffected side (a, c). The percentage decrease in the ATD index between the follow-up intervals is calculated using the following formula: Percentage decrease of ATD index (%) = [(b/a - d/c)/b/a] × 100.

  • Fig. 4 (A) Preoperative radiograph showed a valgus-type impacted femoral neck fractures. (B) Union of the fracture site was confirmed on a radiograph 6 months postoperatively. (C) Twelve months post-operatively there was femoral head collapse and screw cut-out, indicating avascular necrosis.

  • Fig. 5 A plain radiograph shows a paradoxical increase of the articulo-trochanteric (ATD) in valgus-type impacted femoral neck fractures of the left hip. In this case, the ATD of the affected side (a) is 25 mm, and the unaffected side (b) is 29 mm.


Cited by  3 articles

Risk Factors for Neck Shortening in Patients with Valgus Impacted Femoral Neck Fractures Treated with Three Parallel Screws: Is Bone Density an Affecting Factor?
Yerl-Bo Sung, Eui-Yub Jung, Kyung-Il Kim, Soo-Yeon Kim
Hip Pelvis. 2017;29(4):277-285.    doi: 10.5371/hp.2017.29.4.277.

Could We Prevent Displacing the Undisplaced Fracture Neck of Femur? To the Editor
Anoop C. Dhamangaonkar
Clin Orthop Surg. 2012;4(2):171-172.    doi: 10.4055/cios.2012.4.2.171.

Surgical Outcomes of Internal Fixation Using Multiple Screws in Femoral Neck Fractures with Valgus Impaction: When Should We Consider Hip Arthroplasty? A Retrospective, Multicenter Study
Nam Hoon Moon, Won Chul Shin, Jae Hoon Jang, Han Ul Seo, Jung Yun Bae, Kuen Tak Suh
Hip Pelvis. 2019;31(3):136-143.    doi: 10.5371/hp.2019.31.3.136.


Reference

1. Bentley G. Impacted fractures of the neck of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1968. 50(3):551–561.
2. Raaymakers EL. The non-operative treatment of impacted femoral neck fractures. Injury. 2002. 33:Suppl 3. C8–C14.
3. Damany DS, Parker MJ. Varus impacted intracapsular hip fractures. Injury. 2005. 36(5):627–629.
Article
4. Chen WC, Yu SW, Tseng IC, Su JY, Tu YK, Chen WJ. Treatment of undisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. J Trauma. 2005. 58(5):1035–1039.
Article
5. Parker MJ, White A, Boyle A. Fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for undisplaced intracapsular hip fractures. Injury. 2008. 39(7):791–795.
Article
6. Jarolem KL, Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD, Aharonoff G. A comparison of modified Knowles pins and cannulated cancellous screws for the treatment of nondisplaced or impacted femoral neck fractures. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1993. 53(3):11–14.
Article
7. Raaymakers EL, Marti RK. Non-operative treatment of impacted femoral neck fractures: a prospective study of 170 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991. 73(6):950–954.
Article
8. Otremski I, Katz A, Dekel S, Salama R, Newman RJ. Natural history of impacted subcapital femoral fractures and its relevance to treatment options. Injury. 1990. 21(6):379–381.
Article
9. Leitch JM, Paterson DC, Foster BK. Growth disturbance in Legg-Calve-Perthes disease and the consequences of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991. (262):178–184.
Article
10. Shimizu T, Miyamoto K, Masuda K, et al. The clinical significance of impaction at the femoral neck fracture site in the elderly. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007. 127(7):515–521.
Article
11. Nikolopoulos KE, Papadakis SA, Kateros KT, et al. Long-term outcome of patients with avascular necrosis, after internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Injury. 2003. 34(7):525–528.
Article
12. Saito N, Miyasaka T, Toriumi H. Radiographic factors predicting non-union of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1995. 114(4):183–187.
Article
13. Conn KS, Parker MJ. Undisplaced intracapsular hip fractures: results of internal fixation in 375 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004. (421):249–254.
Article
14. Cornwall R, Gilbert MS, Koval KJ, Strauss E, Siu AL. Functional outcomes and mortality vary among different types of hip fractures: a function of patient characteristics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004. (425):64–71.
Article
15. Hansen BA, Solgaard S. Impacted fractures of the femoral neck treated by early mobilization and weight-bearing. Acta Orthop Scand. 1978. 49(2):180–185.
Article
16. Crawford HB. Conservative treatment of impacted fractures of the femoral neck: a report of fifty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1960. 42-A:471–479.
Article
17. Verheyen CC, Smulders TC, van Walsum AD. High secondary displacement rate in the conservative treatment of impacted femoral neck fractures in 105 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005. 125(3):166–168.
18. Cserhati P, Kazar G, Manninger J, Fekete K, Frenyo S. Non-operative or operative treatment for undisplaced femoral neck fractures: a comparative study of 122 non-operative and 125 operatively treated cases. Injury. 1996. 27(8):583–588.
19. Hui AC, Anderson GH, Choudhry R, Boyle J, Gregg PJ. Internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty for undisplaced fractures of the femoral neck in octogenarians. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994. 76(6):891–894.
Article
20. Rogmark C, Flensburg L, Fredin H. Undisplaced femoral neck fractures-no problems? A consecutive study of 224 patients treated with internal fixation. Injury. 2009. 40(3):274–276.
Article
21. Swiontkowski MF, Hansen ST Jr. Percutaneous Neufeld pinning for femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986. (206):113–116.
Article
22. Bjorgul K, Reikeras O. Outcome of undisplaced and moderately displaced femoral neck fractures. Acta Orthop. 2007. 78(4):498–504.
Article
23. Karaeminogullari O, Demirors H, Atabek M, Tuncay C, Tandogan R, Ozalay M. Avascular necrosis and nonunion after osteosynthesis of femoral neck fractures: effect of fracture displacement and time to surgery. Adv Ther. 2004. 21(5):335–342.
24. Rodriguez-Merchan EC. In situ fixation of nondisplaced intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002. (399):42–51.
25. Palm H, Gosvig K, Krasheninnikoff M, Jacobsen S, Gebuhr P. A new measurement for posterior tilt predicts reoperation in undisplaced femoral neck fractures: 113 consecutive patients treated by internal fixation and followed for 1 year. Acta Orthop. 2009. 80(3):303–307.
Article
26. Alho A, Benterud JG, Ronningen H, Hoiseth A. Radiographic prediction of early failure in femoral neck fracture. Acta Orthop Scand. 1991. 62(5):422–426.
Article
27. Calandruccio RA, Anderson WE 3rd. Post-fracture avascular necrosis of the femoral head: correlation of experimental and clinical studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980. (152):49–84.
Article
28. Mathiesen T, Zayer M. A prognostic algorithm for assessment of subcapital femoral neck fractures. Acta Radiol. 1989. 30(6):639–642.
Article
29. Bunata RE, Fahey JJ, Drennan DB. Factors influencing stability and necrosis of impacted femoral neck fractures. JAMA. 1973. 223(1):41–44.
Article
30. Nilsson LT, Johansson A, Stromqvist B. Factors predicting healing complications in femoral neck fractures: 138 patients followed for 2 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993. 64(2):175–177.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CIOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr