Yonsei Med J.  2011 Nov;52(6):961-966. 10.3349/ymj.2011.52.6.961.

Comparative Study of Complete and Partial Omentectomy in Radical Subtotal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. mckim@donga.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Curative surgery for patients with advanced or even early gastric cancer can be defined as resection of the stomach and dissection of the first and second level lymph nodes, including the greater omentum. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long- term outcomes of partial omentectomy (PO) as compared with complete omentectomy (CO).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Seventeen consecutive open distal gastrectomies with POs were initially performed between February and July in 2006. The patients' clinicopathologic data and post-operative outcomes were retrospectively compared with 20 patients who underwent open distal gastrectomies with COs for early gastric cancer in 2005.
RESULTS
The operation time in PO group was significantly shorter than that in CO group (142.4 minutes vs. 165.0 minutes, p=0.018). The serum albumin concentration on the first post-operative day in PO group was significantly higher than CO group (3.8 g/dL vs. 3.5 g/dL, p=0.018). Three postoperative minor complications were successfully managed with conservative treatment. Median follow-up period between PO and CO was 38.1 and 37.7 months. All patients were alive without recurrence until December 30, 2009.
CONCLUSION
PO during open radical distal gastrectomy can be considered a more useful procedure than CO for treating early gastric cancer. To document the long-term technical and oncologic safety of this procedure, a large-scale prospective randomized trial will be needed.

Keyword

Partial omentectomy; gastric cancer; post-operative outcome; comparative study

MeSH Terms

Aged
Female
Gastrectomy/*methods
Humans
Laparoscopy/*methods
Male
Middle Aged
Omentum/*surgery
Retrospective Studies
Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis/*surgery
Treatment Outcome

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Partial omentectomy during gastric cancer surgery for early gastric cancer. The gastroepiploic vessel arcade which contains perigastric lymph nodes is not disturbed.


Reference

1. Benedet JL, Bender H, Jones H 3rd, Ngan HY, Pecorelli S. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000. 70:209–262.
2. Kodera Y, Nakanishi H, Ito S, Yamamura Y, Kanemitsu Y, Shimizu Y, et al. Quantitative detection of disseminated cancer cells in the greater omentum of gastric carcinoma patients with real-time RT-PCR: a comparison with peritoneal lavage cytology. Gastric Cancer. 2002. 5:69–76.
Article
3. Nakajima T. Gastric cancer treatment guidelines in Japan. Gastric Cancer. 2002. 5:1–5.
Article
4. Maruyama K, Sasako M, Kinoshita T, Sano T, Katai H. Surgical treatment for gastric cancer: the Japanese approach. Semin Oncol. 1996. 23:360–368.
5. Siewert JR, Sendler A. The current management of gastric cancer. Adv Surg. 1999. 33:69–93.
6. Park CH, Song KY, Kim SN. Treatment results for gastric cancer surgery: 12 years' experience at a single institute in Korea. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008. 34:36–41.
Article
7. Noh SH, Hyung WJ, Cheong JH. Minimally invasive treatment for gastric cancer: approaches and selection process. J Surg Oncol. 2005. 90:188–193.
Article
8. Jee YS, Hwang SH, Rao J, Park DJ, Kim HH, Lee HJ, et al. Safety of extended endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection following the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association treatment guidelines. Br J Surg. 2009. 96:1157–1161.
Article
9. Shimoyama S, Seto Y, Yasuda H, Kaminishi M. Wider indications for the local resection of gastric cancer by adjacent lymphadenectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2000. 75:157–164.
Article
10. Morii Y, Arita T, Shimoda K, Hagino Y, Yoshida T, Kitano S. Indications for pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on lymph node metastasis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2002. 49:1477–1480.
11. Kitagawa Y, Saha S, Kubo A, Kitajima M. Sentinel node for gastrointestinal malignancies. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2007. 16:71–80.
Article
12. Strong VE, Devaud N, Karpeh M. The role of laparoscopy for gastric surgery in the West. Gastric Cancer. 2009. 12:127–131.
Article
13. Yoon SS, Yang HK. Lymphadenectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: should west meet east. Oncologist. 2009. 14:871–882.
Article
14. Kim MC, Kim W, Kim HH, Ryu SW, Ryu SY, Song KY, et al. Risk factors associated with complication following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale Korean multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008. 15:2692–2700.
Article
15. Kim W, Song KY, Lee HJ, Han SU, Hyung WJ, Cho GS. The impact of comorbidity on surgical outcomes in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of multicenter results. Ann Surg. 2008. 248:793–799.
Article
16. Cho GS, Kim W, Kim HH, Ryu SW, Kim MC, Ryu SY. Multicentre study of the safety of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the elderly. Br J Surg. 2009. 96:1437–1442.
Article
17. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Uyama I, Sugihara K, Tanigawa N. Japanese Laparoscopic Surgery Study Group. A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan. Ann Surg. 2007. 245:68–72.
Article
18. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Sansonetti A, Di Paola M, Recher A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg. 2005. 241:232–237.
Article
19. Strong VE, Devaud N, Allen PJ, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Coit D. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: a case-control study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009. 16:1507–1513.
Article
20. Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010. 251:417–420.
Article
21. Kim MC, Choi HJ, Jung GJ, Kim HH. Techniques and complications of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007. 33:700–705.
Article
22. Shiraishi N, Yasuda K, Kitano S. Laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2006. 9:167–176.
Article
23. Hwang SH, Park do J, Jee YS, Kim MC, Kim HH, Lee HJ, et al. Actual 3-year survival after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Arch Surg. 2009. 144:559–564.
Article
24. Shinohara T, Kanaya S, Taniguchi K, Fujita T, Yanaga K, Uyama I. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Arch Surg. 2009. 144:1138–1142.
Article
25. Tinoco RC, Tinoco AC, El-Kadre LJ, Sueth DM, Conde LM. Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009. 19:384–387.
Article
26. Kang SW, Lee SC, Lee SH, Lee KY, Jeong JJ, Lee YS, et al. Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients. Surgery. 2009. 146:1048–1055.
Article
27. Sammon J, Perry A, Beaule L, Kinkead T, Clark D, Hansen M. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: learning rate analysis as an objective measure of the acquisition of surgical skill. BJU Int. 2010. 106:855–860.
Article
28. McGillicuddy EA, Schuster KM, Davis KA, Longo WE. Factors predicting morbidity and mortality in emergency colorectal procedures in elderly patients. Arch Surg. 2009. 144:1157–1162.
Article
29. Ryan AM, Hearty A, Prichard RS, Cunningham A, Rowley SP, Reynolds JV. Association of hypoalbuminemia on the first postoperative day and complications following esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007. 11:1355–1360.
Article
30. Uzunköy A, Ozbilge H, Horoz M. The influence of omentectomy on bacterial clearance: an experimental study. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009. 15:541–545.
31. Hagiwara A, Sawai K, Sakakura C, Shirasu M, Ohgaki M, Yamasaki J, et al. Complete omentectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy with gastrectomy improves the survival of gastric cancer patients with metastases in the adjacent peritoneum. Hepatogastroenterology. 1998. 45:1922–1929.
32. Yokota T, Ishiyama S, Saito T, Teshima S, Shimotsuma M, Yamauchi H. Treatment strategy of limited surgery in the treatment guidelines for gastric cancer in Japan. Lancet Oncol. 2003. 4:423–428.
Article
33. Lee J, Kim W. Long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: analysis of consecutive 106 experiences. J Surg Oncol. 2009. 100:693–698.
Article
34. Oosterling SJ, van der Bij GJ, Bögels M, van der Sijp JR, Beelen RH, Meijer S, et al. Insufficient ability of omental milky spots to prevent peritoneal tumor outgrowth supports omentectomy in minimal residual disease. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2006. 55:1043–1051.
Article
35. Bosch B, Guller U, Schnider A, Maurer R, Harder F, Metzger U, et al. Perioperative detection of disseminated tumour cells is an independent prognostic factor in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2003. 90:882–888.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr