Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2023 Jan;66(1):42-48. 10.5468/ogs.22277.

Influence of internet, mobile phone use, and sociodemographic factors on women’s knowledge and attitude towards contraception in Indonesia

• Harzif AK
• Shadrina A
• Yo EC
• Reviani N
• Hestiantoro A

• KMID: 2538346
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.22277

Abstract

Objective
Rapid population growth has been a problem in Indonesia for several decades. One of the reasons for this phenomenon is limited knowledge of reproductive health and proper contraception methods. The use of mobile phones and the internet has made it easier to access health information. This study aimed to determine the influence of the internet, mobile phone use, and sociodemographic factors on Indonesian women’s knowledge of and attitudes toward contraception.
Methods
The present study used secondary data from the 2017 Indonesian Health and Demographics Survey. Altogether, 49,627 women participated in this study. Descriptive statistics were performed, and bivariate analysis using the chisquared test was performed to measure the association between variables.
Results
Knowledge about the ovulation cycle and contraception was positively associated with mobile phone ownership, frequent internet use, higher wealth index, reading printed media, listening to the radio, watching the television, higher educational level, and older age. The use and intention of contraception were positively associated with lower wealth index, watching television at least once a week, primary-secondary educational level, rural residence, and older age. Thus, acquisition of knowledge does not necessarily translate into implementation of contraceptive methods, since there might be certain digital and social barriers.
Conclusion
Access to the internet and mobile phones as well as certain sociodemographic factors have contributed to an increase in women’s knowledge about contraception, but not necessarily in their knowledge regarding the use of contraception.

Keyword

Contraception; Reproductive health; Internet; Women; Indonesia

Reference

References

1. McDonald P. The demography of Indonesia in comparative perspective. Bull Indones Econ Stud. 2014; 50:29–52.

2. World Health Organization (WHO). Contraception [Internet]. Geneva: WHO;c2014. [cited 2022 Oct 3]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/112319/WHO_RHR_14.07_eng.pdf.

3. Cleland J, Conde-Agudelo A, Peterson H, Ross J, Tsui A. Contraception and health. Lancet. 2012; 380:149–56.

4. Indriyawati N, Susiloretni KA, Najib N. The current use contraception in Indonesia. J Kebidanan. 2019; 9:174–7.

5. Gafar A, Suza DE, Efendi F, Has EMM, Pramono AP, Susanti IA. Determinants of contraceptive use among married women in Indonesia. F1000Res. 2020; 9:193.

6. Mahendra IGAA, Wilopo SA, Putra IGNE. The role of decision-making pattern on the use of long-acting and permanent contraceptive methods among married women in Indonesia. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019; 24:480–6.

7. Rahayu R, Utomo I, McDonald P. Contraceptive use pattern among married women in Indonesia. Int Conf Fam Plan Res Best Pract. 2009; 36:1–36.

8. Weaver EH, Frankenberg E, Fried BJ, Thomas D, Wheeler SB, Paul JE. Effect of village midwife program on contraceptive prevalence and method choice in Indonesia. Stud Fam Plann. 2013; 44:389–409.

9. Amran Y, Nasir NM, Dachlia D, Yelda F, Utomo B, Ariawan I, et al. Perceptions of contraception and patterns of switching contraceptive methods among familyplanning acceptors in west nusa tenggara, Indonesia. J Prev Med Public Health. 2019; 52:258–64.

10. Denis L, Storms M, Peremans L, Van Royen K, Verhoeven V. Contraception: a questionnaire on knowledge and attitude of adolescents, distributed on facebook. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2016; 28:407–12.

11. Idris H. Factors affecting the use of contraceptive in Indonesia: analysis from the national socioeconomic survey (susenas). KEMAS J Kesehat Masy. 2019; 15:117–23.

12. Lee CJ. The role of internet engagement in the health-knowledge gap. J Broadcast Electron Media. 2009; 53:365–82.

13. Nurhayati H. Number of smartphone users in Indonesia from 2017 to 2020 with forecasts until 2026 [Internet]. Jakarta: Statista Research Department;c2021. [cited 2022 Oct 3]. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/266729/smartphone-users-in-indonesia/.

14. Steinberg A, Griffin-Tomas M, Abu-Odeh D, Whitten A. Evaluation of a mobile phone app for providing adolescents with sexual and reproductive health information, New York City, 2013–2016. Public Health Rep. 2018; 133:234–9.

15. Serrano KJ, Yu M, Riley WT, Patel V, Hughes P, Marchesini K, et al. Willingness to exchange health information via mobile devices: findings from a population-based survey. Ann Fam Med. 2016; 14:34–40.

16. Baker SC, Watson BM. Investigating the association between internet health information use and patient willingness to communicate with health care providers. Health Commun. 2020; 35:716–25.

17. Jiang S, Beaudoin CE. Health literacy and the internet: an exploratory study on the 2013 HINTS survey. Comput Hum Behav. 2016; 58:240–8.

18. Collier R. Containing health myths in the age of viral misinformation. CMAJ. 2018; 190:E578.

19. Fisher M. On the empirical finding of a higher risk of poverty in rural areas: is rural residence endogenous to poverty? J Agric Resour Econ. 2005; 30:185–99.

20. Adebowale SA, Adedini SA, Ibisomi LD, Palamuleni ME. Differential effect of wealth quintile on modern contraceptive use and fertility: evidence from Malawian women. BMC Womens Health. 2014; 14:40.

21. Adebowale AS, Gbadebo B, Afolabi FR. Wealth index, empowerment and modern contraceptive use among married women in Nigeria: are they interrelated? J Public Health. 2016; 24:415–26.

22. Lee Y, Park SA, Lee H, Willis E, Cameron GT. Resources aren’t everything, but they do help: assessing local TV health news to deliver substantive and useful health information. J Commun Healthc. 2019; 12:13–22.

23. Jacobs W, Amuta AO, Jeon KC. Health information seeking in the digital age: an analysis of health information seeking behavior among US adults. Cogent Soc Sci. 2017; 3:1302785.

24. Smith ML, Menn M, McKyer ELJ. Effectiveness of the radio as a health information source. J Radio Audio Media. 2011; 18:196–211.