Korean J Orthod.  2021 Nov;51(6):363-365. 10.4041/kjod.2021.51.6.363.

READER’S FORUM

• Lee SY
• Kim YJ

• KMID: 2522498
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2021.51.6.363

Abstract

no abstract available

Figure

• 

  Figure 1 Measurement of linear distances. Linear distances between spheres are automatically calculated by matching with pre-imputed specification data. Distance 1, between reference spheres 1 and 2; Distance 2, between reference spheres 1 and 3; Distance 3, between reference spheres 1 and 4; Distance 4, between reference spheres 2 and 3; Distance 5, between reference spheres 2 and 4; Distance 6, between reference spheres 3 and 4.

Reference

1. Kachhara S, Nallaswamy D, Ganapathy DM, Sivaswamy V, Rajaraman V. 2020; Assessment of intraoral scanning technology for multiple implant impressions - a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 20:141–52. DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_379_19. PMID: 32655218. PMCID: PMC7335030.

2. Müller P, Ender A, Joda T, Katsoulis J. 2016; Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner. Quintessence Int. 47:343–9.

3. Medina-Sotomayor P, Pascual-Moscardó A, Camps I. 2018; Accuracy of four digital scanners according to scanning strategy in complete-arch impressions. PLoS One. 13:e0202916. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202916. PMID: 30212498. PMCID: PMC6136706.

4. Oh KC, Park JM, Moon HS. 2020; Effects of scanning strategy and scanner type on the accuracy of intraoral scans: a new approach for assessing the accuracy of scanned data. J Prosthodont. 29:518–23. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13158. PMID: 32133690.

5. Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. 2018; Effect of software version on the accuracy of an intraoral scanning device. Int J Prosthodont. 31:375–6. DOI: 10.11607/ijp.5781. PMID: 29624626.

6. Schmidt A, Schlenz MA, Liu H, Kämpe HS, Wöstmann B. 2021; The influence of hard- and software improvement of intraoral scanners on the implant transfer accuracy from 2012 to 2021: an in vitro study. Appl Sci. 11:7166. DOI: 10.3390/app11157166.

7. Revilla-León M, Subramanian SG, Özcan M, Krishnamurthy VR. 2020; Clinical study of the influence of ambient light scanning conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of an intraoral scanner. J Prosthodont. 29:107–13. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13135. PMID: 31860144.

8. Lim JH, Park JM, Kim M, Heo SJ, Myung JY. 2018; Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience. J Prosthet Dent. 119:225–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.002. PMID: 28689906.

9. Waldecker M, Rues S, Rammelsberg P, Bömicke W. 2021; Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: a comparative in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 126:414–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.019. PMID: 32950254.