1. Verbiest H. A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1954; 36(2):230–237. PMID:
13163105.
Article
2. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Gejo R, Tsuji H. Preventive measures of back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery in rats. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23(21):2282–2287. PMID:
9820907.
Article
3. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 1: histologic and histochemical analyses in rats. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994; 19(22):2590–2597. PMID:
7855686.
4. Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(22):2683–2688. PMID:
8961456.
5. See DH, Kraft GH. Electromyography in paraspinal muscles following surgery for root compression. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1975; 56(2):80–83. PMID:
1124981.
6. Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljarvi L, Airaksinen O, Partanen J, Tapaninaho A. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993; 18(5):575–581. PMID:
8484148.
Article
7. Mariconda M, Zanforlino G, Celestino GA, Brancaleone S, Fava R, Milano C. Factors influencing the outcome of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord. 2000; 13(2):131–137. PMID:
10780688.
Article
8. Radu AS, Menkes CJ. Update on lumbar spinal stenosis: retrospective study of 62 patients and review of the literature. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1998; 65(5):337–345. PMID:
9636953.
9. Silvers HR, Lewis PJ, Asch HL. Decompressive lumbar laminectomy for spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg. 1993; 78(5):695–701. PMID:
8468598.
Article
10. Watanabe K, Hosoya T, Shiraishi T, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Toyama Y. Lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: technical note. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005; 3(5):405–408. PMID:
16302638.
11. Watanabe K, Matsumoto M, Ikegami T, et al. Reduced post-operative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011; 14(1):51–58. PMID:
21142464.
Article
12. Cho DY, Lin HL, Lee WY, Lee HC. Split-spinous process laminotomy and discectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007; 6(3):229–239. PMID:
17355022.
Article
13. Kim K, Isu T, Sugawara A, Matsumoto R, Isobe M. Comparison of the effect of 3 different approaches to the lumbar spinal canal on postoperative paraspinal muscle damage. Surg Neurol. 2008; 69(2):109–113. PMID:
18261638.
Article
14. Nomura H, Yanagisawa Y, Arima J, Oga M. Clinical outcome of microscopic lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014; 21(2):187–194. PMID:
24878270.
15. Uehara M, Takahashi J, Hashidate H, et al. Comparison of spinous process-splitting laminectomy versus conventional laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Asian Spine J. 2014; 8(6):768–776. PMID:
25558319.
Article
16. Kanbara S, Yukawa Y, Ito K, Machino M, Kato F. Surgical outcomes of modified lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015; 22(4):353–357. PMID:
25594729.
Article
17. Lee S, Srikantha U. Spinous process splitting laminectomy: clinical outcome and radiological analysis of extent of decompression. Int J Spine Surg. 2015; 9:20. PMID:
26114089.
Article
18. Baghdadi YM, Moussallem CD, Shuaib MA, Clarke MJ, Dekutoski MB, Nassr AN. Lumbar spinous process-splitting laminoplasty: a novel technique for minimally invasive lumbar decompression. Orthopedics. 2016; 39(5):e950–e956. PMID:
27337665.
Article
19. Maruo K, Tachibana T, Inoue S, Arizumi F, Yoshiya S. Prognostic factors of surgical outcome after spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Asian Spine J. 2015; 9(5):705–712. PMID:
26435788.
Article
20. Kakiuchi M, Fukushima W. Impact of spinous process integrity on ten to twelve-year outcomes after posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: study of open-door laminoplasty using a spinous process-splitting approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97(20):1667–1677. PMID:
26491131.
21. Lee DY, Lee SH. Spinous process splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a critical appraisal. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2008; 51(4):204–207. PMID:
18683110.
Article
22. Rajasekaran S, Thomas A, Kanna RM, Prasad Shetty A. Lumbar spinous process splitting decompression provides equivalent outcomes to conventional midline decompression in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis: a prospective, randomized controlled study of 51 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38(20):1737–1743. PMID:
23797498.
23. Hatta Y, Shiraishi T, Sakamoto A, et al. Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(8):E276–E280. PMID:
19365236.
24. Cammisa FP Jr, Girardi FP, Sangani PK, Parvataneni HK, Cadag S, Sandhu HS. Incidental durotomy in spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(20):2663–2667. PMID:
11034653.
Article
25. Wang JC, Bohlman HH, Riew KD. Dural tears secondary to operations on the lumbar spine: management and results after a two-year-minimum follow-up of eighty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80(12):1728–1732. PMID:
9875930.
Article
26. Hu X, Ohnmeiss DD, Lieberman IH. Use of an ultrasonic osteotome device in spine surgery: experience from the first 128 patients. Eur Spine J. 2013; 22(12):2845–2849. PMID:
23584231.
Article
27. Sanborn MR, Balzer J, Gerszten PC, Karausky P, Cheng BC, Welch WC. Safety and efficacy of a novel ultrasonic osteotome device in an ovine model. J Clin Neurosci. 2011; 18(11):1528–1533. PMID:
21917459.
Article