Clin Endosc.  2018 Sep;51(5):478-484. 10.5946/ce.2018.006.

Factors Affecting Endoscopic Curative Resection of Gastric Cancer in the Population-Based Screening Era

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. choim@catholic.ac.kr
  • 2Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS
Since population-based screening for gastric cancer in Korea was implemented, endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer has become increasingly popular. This study investigates factors affecting endoscopic curative resection of early gastric cancer in population-based screening for gastric cancer.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed data of patients with newly diagnosed gastric cancer who underwent treatment at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. All patients completed questionnaires about clinical information, including interval between surveillance tests for gastric cancer.
RESULTS
Of 469 gastric cancer patients, 147 (31.3%) had undergone curative endoscopic resection, 260 (55.4%) had undergone curative surgical resection, and 62 (13.3%) underwent non-curative resection or were in an inoperable state. Patients with curative endoscopic resection had fewer alarm symptoms/signs than other groups. In multivariate analysis, regular surveillance endoscopy was the only factor predicting curative endoscopic resection (odds ratio [OR], 6.099; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.532-14.933). In addition, patients undergoing gastric cancer screening had a significantly higher rate of endoscopic curative resection compared with subjects who had never been screened. (1-year interval: OR, 49.969; 95% CI, 6.340-393.827, 2-year interval: OR, 15.283; 95% CI, 1.833-127.406, over 2-year interval: OR, 10.651; 95% CI, 1.248-90.871). Shorter screening test intervals were associated with higher rates of endoscopic curative resection.
CONCLUSIONS
Regular surveillance testing was the independent factor predicting curative endoscopic resection of gastric cancer.

Keyword

Stomach neoplasms; Early detection of cancer; Endoscopic mucosal resection

MeSH Terms

Early Detection of Cancer
Endoscopy
Humans
Korea
Mass Screening*
Multivariate Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Seoul
Stomach Neoplasms*

Cited by  2 articles

Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Non-Curative Resection in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer Treated with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Retrospective Multicenter Study in Korea
Si Hyung Lee, Min Cheol Kim, Seong Woo Jeon, Kang Nyeong Lee, Jong Jae Park, Su Jin Hong
Clin Endosc. 2020;53(2):196-205.    doi: 10.5946/ce.2019.123.

The More, the Better: Is This True in Endoscopy for Gastric Cancer Screening?
Seong Woo Jeon
Clin Endosc. 2018;51(5):402-403.    doi: 10.5946/ce.2018.098.


Reference

1. Jung KW, Won YJ, Oh CM, Kong HJ, Lee DH, Lee KH. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2014. Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 49:292–305.
Article
2. Choi KS, Suh M. Screening for gastric cancer: the usefulness of endoscopy. Clin Endosc. 2014; 47:490–496.
Article
3. Suh M, Song S, Cho HN, et al. Trends in participation rates for the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea, 2002-2012. Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 49:798–806.
Article
4. Choi KS, Jun JK, Suh M, et al. Effect of endoscopy screening on stage at gastric cancer diagnosis: results of the National Cancer Screening Programme in Korea. Br J Cancer. 2015; 112:608–612.
Article
5. Choi KS, Jun JK, Park EC, et al. Performance of different gastric cancer screening methods in Korea: a population-based study. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e50041.
Article
6. Lee S, Jun JK, Suh M, et al. Gastric cancer screening uptake trends in Korea: results for the National Cancer Screening Program from 2002 to 2011: a prospective cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94:e533.
7. Jung HY. Endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer: current status in Korea. Dig Endosc. 2012; 24 Suppl 1:159–165.
Article
8. Pyo JH, Lee H, Min BH, et al. Long-term outcome of endoscopic resection vs. surgery for early gastric cancer: a non-inferiority-matched cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016; 111:240–249.
Article
9. Ryu SJ, Kim BW, Kim BG, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgical resection for early gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study on immediate and long-term outcome over 5 years. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30:5283–5289.
10. Kim SG, Ji SM, Lee NR, et al. Quality of life after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Gut Liver. 2017; 11:87–92.
Article
11. Bowrey DJ, Griffin SM, Wayman J, Karat D, Hayes N, Raimes SA. Use of alarm symptoms to select dyspeptics for endoscopy causes patients with curable esophagogastric cancer to be overlooked. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20:1725–1728.
Article
12. Axon A. Symptoms and diagnosis of gastric cancer at early curable stage. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006; 20:697–708.
Article
13. Yanaoka K, Oka M, Mukoubayashi C, et al. Cancer high-risk subjects identified by serum pepsinogen tests: outcomes after 10-year follow-up in asymptomatic middle-aged males. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008; 17:838–845.
Article
14. Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene F, Trotti A. AJCC cancer staging handbook : from the AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag New York;2010.
15. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011; 14:101–112.
16. Vakil N, Moayyedi P, Fennerty MB, Talley NJ. Limited value of alarm features in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2006; 131:390–401. quiz 659-660.
Article
17. Hamashima C, Ogoshi K, Okamoto M, Shabana M, Kishimoto T, Fukao A. A community-based, case-control study evaluating mortality reduction from gastric cancer by endoscopic screening in Japan. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e79088.
Article
18. Lee KJ, Inoue M, Otani T, Iwasaki M, Sasazuki S, Tsugane S. Gastric cancer screening and subsequent risk of gastric cancer: a large-scale population-based cohort study, with a 13-year follow-up in Japan. Int J Cancer. 2006; 118:2315–2321.
Article
19. Hamashima C, Shibuya D, Yamazaki H, et al. The Japanese guidelines for gastric cancer screening. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008; 38:259–267.
Article
20. Nam SY, Choi IJ, Park KW, et al. Effect of repeated endoscopic screening on the incidence and treatment of gastric cancer in health screenees. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009; 21:855–860.
Article
21. Nam JH, Choi IJ, Cho SJ, et al. Association of the interval between endoscopies with gastric cancer stage at diagnosis in a region of high prevalence. Cancer. 2012; 118:4953–4960.
Article
22. Kim YS, Park HA, Kim BS, Yook JH, Lee MS. Efficacy of screening for gastric cancer in a Korean adult population: a case-control study. J Korean Med Sci. 2000; 15:510–515.
Article
23. Jun JK, Choi KS, Lee HY, et al. Effectiveness of the Korean National Cancer Screening Program in reducing gastric cancer mortality. Gastroenterology. 2017; 152:1319–1328. e7.
Article
24. Riecken B, Pfeiffer R, Ma JL, et al. No impact of repeated endoscopic screens on gastric cancer mortality in a prospectively followed Chinese population at high risk. Prev Med. 2002; 34:22–28.
Article
25. Lin JT. Screening of gastric cancer: who, when, and how. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014; 12:135–138.
Article
26. Yoon H, Kim N. Diagnosis and management of high risk group for gastric cancer. Gut Liver. 2015; 9:5–17.
Article
27. Choi IJ. Endoscopic gastric cancer screening and surveillance in highrisk groups. Clin Endosc. 2014; 47:497–503.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr