1. Kiter E, Gunal I, Karatosun V, Korman E. The relationship between the tibialis posterior tendon and the accessory navicular. Ann Anat. 2000; 182(1):65–68. PMID:
10668560.
Article
2. Grogan DP, Gasser SI, Ogden JA. The painful accessory navicular: a clinical and histopathological study. Foot Ankle. 1989; 10(3):164–169. PMID:
2613130.
Article
3. Bennett GL, Weiner DS, Leighley B. Surgical treatment of symptomatic accessory tarsal navicular. J Pediatr Orthop. 1990; 10(4):445–449. PMID:
2358479.
Article
4. Chung JW, Chu IT. Outcome of fusion of a painful accessory navicular to the primary navicular. Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30(2):106–109. PMID:
19254502.
Article
5. Kiter E, Gunal I, Turgut A, Kose N. Evaluation of simple excision in the treatment of symptomatic accessory navicular associated with flat feet. J Orthop Sci. 2000; 5(4):333–335. PMID:
10982680.
Article
6. Kopp FJ, Marcus RE. Clinical outcome of surgical treatment of the symptomatic accessory navicular. Foot Ankle Int. 2004; 25(1):27–30. PMID:
14768961.
Article
7. Macnicol MF, Voutsinas S. Surgical treatment of the symptomatic accessory navicular. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984; 66(2):218–226. PMID:
6707058.
Article
8. Sullivan JA, Miller WA. The relationship of the accessory navicular to the development of the flat foot. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979; (144):233–237. PMID:
535230.
Article
9. Nakayama S, Sugimoto K, Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kasanami R. Percutaneous drilling of symptomatic accessory navicular in young athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33(4):531–535. PMID:
15722276.
Article
10. Malicky ES, Levine DS, Sangeorzan BJ. Modification of the Kidner procedure with fusion of the primary and accessory navicular bones. Foot Ankle Int. 1999; 20(1):53–54. PMID:
9921775.
Article
11. Scott AT, Sabesan VJ, Saluta JR, Wilson MA, Easley ME. Fusion versus excision of the symptomatic Type II accessory navicular: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30(1):10–15. PMID:
19176179.
Article
12. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the anklehindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994; 15(7):349–353. PMID:
7951968.
Article
13. Ibrahim T, Beiri A, Azzabi M, Best AJ, Taylor GJ, Menon DK. Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007; 46(2):65–74. PMID:
17331864.
Article
14. Lee WC, Moon JS, Lee HS, Lee K. Alignment of ankle and hindfoot in early stage ankle osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32(7):693–699. PMID:
21972764.
Article
15. Ray S, Goldberg VM. Surgical treatment of the accessory navicular. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983; (177):61–66. PMID:
6861408.
Article
16. Veitch JM. Evaluation of the Kidner procedure in treatment of symptomatic accessory tarsal scaphoid. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978; (131):210–213.
Article
17. Sella EJ, Lawson JP, Ogden JA. The accessory navicular synchondrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; (209):280–285. PMID:
3731610.
Article
18. Vaughan P, Singh D. Ongoing pain and deformity after an excision of the accessory navicular. Foot Ankle Clin. 2014; 19(3):541–553. PMID:
25129360.
Article
19. Flemister AS, Neville CG, Houck J. The relationship between ankle, hindfoot, and forefoot position and posterior tibial muscle excursion. Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28(4):448–455. PMID:
17475139.
Article
20. Myerson MS, Corrigan J. Treatment of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction with flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer and calcaneal osteotomy. Orthopedics. 1996; 19(5):383–388. PMID:
8727331.
Article