Clin Orthop Surg.  2017 Jun;9(2):145-152. 10.4055/cios.2017.9.2.145.

Comparison of Postoperative Infection-Related Complications between Cemented and Cementless Hemiarthroplasty in Elderly Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. hd1404@hanafos.com
  • 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The purpose of this review was to assess the risk of infection-related complications following cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for published randomized clinical trials comparing cemented hemiarthroplasty with cementless hemiarthroplasty in patients with a femoral neck fracture and more than 65 years of age. Eight randomized controlled trials were available for analysis. A meta-analysis (with a fixed-effects model) and a meta-regression analysis (with continuous variables) were performed.
RESULTS
The 8 trials included 1,204 hips (608 cemented and 596 cementless). There was no significant difference between the cemented and cementless groups regarding the incidence of deep infection, superficial infection, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection. The overall incidence of postoperative deep infection was 2.3% (14/608) in the cemented group and 1.2% (7/596) in the cementless group (relative risk, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 4.14; I² = 0%; p = 0.206). No publication bias was found in the funnel plot.
CONCLUSIONS
Results of our meta-analysis suggest that when selecting a fixation method for hemiarthroplasty, infection-related postoperative complications are not the determinant factor to consider.

Keyword

Infection; Intraoperative complications; Hemiarthroplasty; Meta-analysis

MeSH Terms

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bacterial Infections/*epidemiology
Bone Cements/*therapeutic use
*Hemiarthroplasty/adverse effects/statistics & numerical data
Humans
Postoperative Complications/*epidemiology
Bone Cements

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Flow diagram of relevant clinical study selection.

  • Fig. 2 Forest plot of the odds ratios with confidence intervals for deep infection. Two of the 8 studies reporting no cases of deep infection were excluded in this analysis. CI: confidence interval.

  • Fig. 3 Forest plot of the odds ratios with confidence intervals (CIs) for postoperative infection-related complications. (A) Superficial wound infection. (B) Pneumonia. (C) Urinary tract infection.

  • Fig. 4 Funnel plot for postoperative infection-related complications.

  • Fig. 5 The summary of bias risk of randomized controlled trials.


Reference

1. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Tornetta P 3rd, et al. Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: an international survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(9):2122–2130. PMID: 16140828.
2. Gjertsen JE, Vinje T, Engesaeter LB, et al. Internal screw fixation compared with bipolar hemiarthroplasty for treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(3):619–628. PMID: 20194320.
Article
3. Parker MJ, Gurusamy KS, Azegami S. Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (6):CD001706. PMID: 20556753.
Article
4. Husted H, Otte KS, Kristensen BB, Orsnes T, Wong C, Kehlet H. Low risk of thromboembolic complications after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2010; 81(5):599–605. PMID: 20919815.
Article
5. Sonne-Holm S, Walter S, Jensen JS. Moore hemi-arthroplasty with and without bone cement in femoral neck fractures: a clinical controlled trial. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982; 53(6):953–956. PMID: 6758474.
6. Luo X, He S, Li Z, Huang D. Systematic review of cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in older patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012; 132(4):455–463. PMID: 22160512.
Article
7. Ahn J, Man LX, Park S, Sodl JF, Esterhai JL. Systematic review of cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty outcomes for femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(10):2513–2518. PMID: 18651200.
Article
8. Li T, Zhuang Q, Weng X, Zhou L, Bian Y. Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013; 8(7):e68903. PMID: 23935902.
Article
9. Azegami S, Gurusamy KS, Parker MJ. Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Hip Int. 2011; 21(5):509–517. PMID: 21948035.
Article
10. Ning GZ, Li YL, Wu Q, Feng SQ, Li Y, Wu QL. Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: an updated meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014; 24(1):7–14. PMID: 23412274.
Article
11. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester, UK: Wiley;2008.
12. Deangelis JP, Ademi A, Staff I, Lewis CG. Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomized trial with early follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2012; 26(3):135–140. PMID: 22198652.
13. Emery RJ, Broughton NS, Desai K, Bulstrode CJ, Thomas TL. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for subcapital fracture of the femoral neck: a prospective randomised trial of cemented Thompson and uncemented Moore stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73(2):322–324. PMID: 2005165.
Article
14. Langslet E, Frihagen F, Opland V, Madsen JE, Nordsletten L, Figved W. Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: 5-year followup of a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472(4):1291–1299. PMID: 24081667.
Article
15. Parker MI, Pryor G, Gurusamy K. Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fractures: a randomised controlled trial in 400 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92(1):116–122. PMID: 20044689.
16. Santini S, Rebeccato A, Bolgan I, Turi G. Hip fractures in elderly patients treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty: comparison between cemented and cementless implants. J Orthop Traumatol. 2005; 6(2):80–87.
Article
17. Taylor F, Wright M, Zhu M. Hemiarthroplasty of the hip with and without cement: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(7):577–583. PMID: 22488613.
Article
18. Vidovic D, Matejcic A, Punda M, et al. Periprosthetic bone loss following hemiarthroplasty: a comparison between cemented and cementless hip prosthesis. Injury. 2013; 44(Suppl 3):S62–S66. PMID: 24060022.
Article
19. Wijeratna MD, McRoberts J, Porteous MJ. Cost of infection after surgery for intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015; 97(4):283–286. PMID: 26263936.
Article
20. Cahill JL, Shadbolt B, Scarvell JM, Smith PN. Quality of life after infection in total joint replacement. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2008; 16(1):58–65. PMID: 18453662.
Article
21. Abdulkarim A, Ellanti P, Motterlini N, Fahey T, O'Byrne JM. Cemented versus uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013; 5(1):e8. PMID: 23705066.
Article
22. Yoon BH, Ha YC, Lee YK, Koo KH. Postoperative deep infection after cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30(10):1823–1827. PMID: 26021907.
Article
23. Wang F, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Ma C, Feng X. Comparison of bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015; 16:229. PMID: 26316274.
Article
24. Namba RS, Inacio MC, Paxton EW. Risk factors associated with surgical site infection in 30,491 primary total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94(10):1330–1338. PMID: 23015556.
Article
25. Gjertsen JE, Lie SA, Vinje T, et al. More re-operations after uncemented than cemented hemiarthroplasty used in the treatment of displaced fractures of the femoral neck: an observational study of 11,116 hemiarthroplasties from a national register. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94(8):1113–1119. PMID: 22844055.
26. Jameson SS, Jensen CD, Elson DW, et al. Cemented versus cementless hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular neck of femur fracture: a comparison of 60,848 matched patients using national data. Injury. 2013; 44(6):730–734. PMID: 23206920.
27. Yli-Kyyny T, Sund R, Heinanen M, Venesmaa P, Kroger H. Cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures? Acta Orthop. 2014; 85(1):49–53. PMID: 24397746.
Article
28. Hill C, Flamant R, Mazas F, Evrard J. Prophylactic cefazolin versus placebo in total hip replacement: report of a multicentre double-blind randomised trial. Lancet. 1981; 1(8224):795–796. PMID: 6111670.
Article
29. Vamvakas EC, Carven JH. Transfusion of white-cell containing allogeneic blood components and postoperative wound infection: effect of confounding factors. Transfus Med. 1998; 8(1):29–36. PMID: 9569457.
30. Talsnes O, Vinje T, Gjertsen JE, et al. Perioperative mortality in hip fracture patients treated with cemented and uncemented hemiprosthesis: a register study of 11,210 patients. Int Orthop. 2013; 37(6):1135–1140. PMID: 23508867.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CIOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr