1. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Active or passive self-ligating brackets? A randomized controlled trial of comparative efficiency in resolving maxillary anterior crowding in adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137:12.e1–12.e6. discussion 12-3.
Article
2. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Katsaros C, Eliades T. Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140:e99–e105.
Article
3. Papageorgiou SN, Konstantinidis I, Papadopoulou K, Jäger A, Bourauel C. A systematic review and metaanalysis of experimental clinical evidence on initial aligning archwires and archwire sequences. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2014; 17:197–215.
Article
4. Papageorgiou SN, Konstantinidis I, Papadopoulou K, Jäger A, Bourauel C. Clinical effects of pre-adjusted edgewise orthodontic brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2014; 36:350–363.
Article
5. Papageorgiou SN, Gölz L, Jäger A, Eliades T, Bourauel C. Lingual vs. labial fixed orthodontic appliances: systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effects. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016; 124:105–118.
Article
6. Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG, Damone J, James RD, Cangialosi TJ, et al. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 114:589–599.
7. Mislik B, Konstantonis D, Katsadouris A, Eliades T. University clinic and private practice treatment outcomes in Class I extraction and nonextraction patients: a comparative study with the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 149:253–258.
Article
8. Pinskaya YB, Hsieh TJ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK. Comprehensive clinical evaluation as an outcome assessment for a graduate orthodontics program. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126:533–543.
Article
9. Cangialosi TJ, Riolo ML, Owens SE Jr, Dykhouse VJ, Moffitt AH, Grubb JE, et al. The ABO discrepancy index: a measure of case complexity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 125:270–278.
Article
10. Dougherty HL. The orthodontic standard of care. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991; 99:482–485.
Article
11. Vig KWL, Firestone A, Wood W, Lenk M. Quality of orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod. 2007; 13:81–87.
Article
12. Mavreas D, Athanasiou AE. Factors affecting the duration of orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2008; 30:386–395.
Article
13. Tsichlaki A, Chin SY, Pandis N, Fleming PS. How long does treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances last? A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 149:308–318.
Article
14. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [Internet]. The Cochrane Collaboration;2011. updated 2011 Mar. cited 2016 Dec 3. Available from:
http://handbook.cochrane.org/.
15. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62:e1–e34.
Article
16. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998; 52:377–384.
Article
17. Veroniki AA, Jackson D, Viechtbauer W, Bender R, Bowden J, Knapp G, et al. Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in metaanalysis. Res Synth Methods. 2016; 7:55–79.
Article
18. Papageorgiou SN. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part I--How to choose effect measure and statistical model. J Orthod. 2014; 41:317–326.
Article
19. Papageorgiou SN. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part II--Is all that glitters gold. J Orthod. 2014; 41:327–336.
20. IntHout J, Ioannidis JP, Rovers MM, Goeman JJ. Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016; 6:e010247.
Article
21. Ioannidis JP. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008; 14:951–957.
Article
22. Tsichlaki A, Chin SY, Pandis N, Fleming PS. How long does treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances last? A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 149:308–318.
Article
23. Djeu G, Shelton C, Maganzini A. Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment compared with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128:292–298. discussion 298.
Article
24. Viwattanatipa N, Buapuean W, Komoltri C. Relationship between discrepancy index and the objective grading system in thai board of orthodontics patients. Orthod Waves. 2016; 75:54–63.
Article
25. Papageorgiou SN, Xavier GM, Cobourne MT. Basic study design influences the results of orthodontic clinical investigations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015; 68:1512–1522.
Article
26. Papageorgiou SN, Koretsi V, Jäger A. Bias from historical control groups used in orthodontic research: a meta-epidemiological study. Eur J Orthod. 2017; 39:98–105.
Article
27. Marques LS, Freitas ND Jr, Pereira LJ, Ramos-Jorge ML. Quality of orthodontic treatment performed by orthodontists and general dentists. Angle Orthod. 2012; 82:102–106.
Article
28. CoHong M, Kook YA, Baek SH, Kim MK. Comparison of treatment outcome assessment for class I malocclusion patients: peer assessment rating versus American board of orthodontics-objective grading system. J Korean Dent Sci. 2014; 7:6–15.
Article
29. Hong M, Kook YA, Kim MK, Lee JI, Kim HG, Baek SH. The Improvement and Completion of Outcome index: A new assessment system for quality of orthodontic treatment. Korean J Orthod. 2016; 46:199–211.
Article
30. Pocock SJ, Assmann SE, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems. Stat Med. 2002; 21:2917–2930.
Article
31. Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA, Athanasiou AE. Reporting characteristics of meta-analyses in orthodontics: methodological assessment and statistical recommendations. Eur J Orthod. 2014; 36:74–85.
Article
32. Hernández AV, Steyerberg EW, Habbema JD. Covariate adjustment in randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes increases statistical power and reduces sample size requirements. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004; 57:454–460.
Article
33. Papageorgiou SN, Kloukos D, Petridis H, Pandis N. Publication of statistically significant research findings in prosthodontics & implant dentistry in the context of other dental specialties. J Dent. 2015; 43:1195–1202.
Article