J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc.  2016 Nov;55(4):289-298. 10.4306/jknpa.2016.55.4.289.

Current Human Rights Education for Psychiatrists Leaves Much to Be Desired

• Kang YR
• Ahn JH
• Joo Y
• Kim CY

• KMID: 2361218
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4306/jknpa.2016.55.4.289

Abstract

OBJECTIVES
Human rights education programs have been implemented annually since Korea enacted human rights legislation in 2009. The purpose of this study was to investigate attitudes of Korean psychiatrists toward human rights education and assess the relevance of the provided education materials.
METHODS
Questionnaires comprised of 8 items were provided to 274 psychiatrists attending the April 2015 Korean Neuropsychiatric Association seminar. In addition, 12 cases related to education material developed by the Korean National Human Rights Commission were examined to determine whether the material's content was relevant and appropriate for human rights education.
RESULTS
Data from 267 psychiatrists that answered all requested questions were included in the analysis. Although respondents in general accepted the beneficial intent of human rights education, the majority of respondents (71.5%) disagreed with the mandatory 4 h of annual human rights education. Approximately half of respondents (49.4%) believed that frequency of such education should be decreased. A substantial percentage of respondents (38.7%) expressed overall dissatisfaction with the education program, and more than half of respondents (55.6%) were skeptical that the current education program could produce a real difference in attitudes toward human rights. The case reviews highlighted several problems. First, all education materials were heavily weighted toward psychiatric hospitalization legal proceedings rather than human rights. Among the 12 cases examined, four were considered inappropriate for human rights education because they were presented as if human rights abuse was synonymous with violation of a law, even if the law was ambiguous.
CONCLUSION
The current human rights education program does not meet psychiatrists' expectations. The results of this study suggest there is a need to reconsider the purpose and means of providing human rights education to psychiatrists.

Keyword

Human rights education; Psychiatrists; National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea; Korean Mental Health Act

MeSH Terms

Education*
Hospitalization
Human Rights Abuses
Human Rights*
Humans*
Jurisprudence
Korea
Psychiatry*
Surveys and Questionnaires

Reference

1. General Assembly Resolution of United Nations 2856. Declaration on the Rights of Mentally Retarded Persons;1971. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/RightsOfMentallyRetardedPersons.aspx.

2. General Assembly Resolution of United Nations 66/137. United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Education and Training. cited 2016 Mar 1. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Education/Training/Pages/UNDHREducationTraining.aspx.

3. Law.go.kr [homepage on the Internet]. Korean Mental Health Act;cited 2016 Mar 1. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=171023&efYd=20151119#0000;2008.

4. Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2015 Human rights education guideline. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2015.

5. National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea. From human to human: human rights education for mental health worker. Seoul: National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea;2014.

6. National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Korea. Human rights education center-smart learning service. cited 2015 Jun 4. Available from: https://edu.humanrights.go.kr/solution/home/article/articleView.do?gmenu=2&rmenu=04&cmenu=0401&article_no=571&bbs_no=7.

7. New York State Legislature. Mental Hygiene Law Article 9-Hospi-talization of the mentally ill. cited 2016 Mar 1. Available from: Available from:http://public.leginfo.state.ny.us/navigate.cgi?NVMUO.

8. Ontario Hospital Association. A practical guide to mental health and the law in Ontario. Toronto: Ontario Hospital Association;2012.

9. Suh TW. Mental Health Policy and Law in Korea. Health Welf Policy Forum. 2007; 123:42–56.

10. Kim YR. Reconsider the judgements: ten most disputed issues in Korean supreme court. Seoul: Changbi;2015. p. 35–37.

11. Baek SH. Institution of Protector in Japan, and the Supervisor's Liability for the People with Mental Disorder in Civil Law-Focusing on the Changes of the Mental Health and Welfare Law in Japan. J Prop Law. 2015; 31:283–307.

12. World Health Organization. Mental Health Legistation & Human Rights. cited 2016 Mar 1. Available from: http://www.who.int/mental_health/policy/services/7_legislation%20HR_WEB_07.pdf.

13. Zhang S, Mellsop G, Brink J, Wang X. Involuntary admission and treatment of patients with mental disorder. Neurosci Bull. 2015; 31:99–112.

14. General Assembly Resolution of United Nation 46/119. Principles for the protection of persons with Mental illness and the improvement of mental health care. cited 2016 Mar 1. Available from: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/46/a46r119.htm.