Diabetes Metab J.  2014 Apr;38(2):134-142. 10.4093/dmj.2014.38.2.134.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Internet-Based Mentoring Program for Type 1 Diabetes Patients with Inadequate Glycemic Control

• Suh S
• Jean C
• Koo M
• Lee SY
• Cho MJ
• Sim KH
• Jin SM
• Bae JC
• Kim JH

• KMID: 2280704
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2014.38.2.134

Abstract

BACKGROUND
To determine whether an internet-based mentoring program can improve glycemic control in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).
METHODS
Subjects with T1DM on intensive insulin therapy and with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) > or =8.0% were randomized to mentored (glucometer transmission with feedback from mentors) or control (glucometer transmission without feedback) groups and were examined for 12 weeks. Five mentors were interviewed and selected, of which two were T1DM patients themselves and three were parents with at least one child diagnosed with T1DM since more than 5 years ago.
RESULTS
A total of 57 T1DM adult subjects with a mean duration after being diagnosed with diabetes of 7.4 years were recruited from Samsung Medical Center. Unfortunately, the mentored group failed to show significant improvements in HbA1c levels or other outcomes, including the quality of life, after completion of the study. However, the mentored group monitored their blood glucose (1.41 vs. 0.30) and logged into our website (http://ubisens.co.kr/) more frequently (20.59 times vs. 5.07 times) than the control group.
CONCLUSION
A 12-week internet-based mentoring program for T1DM patients with inadequate glycemic control did not prove to be superior to the usual follow-up. However, the noted increase in the subjects' frequency of blood glucose monitoring may lead to clinical benefits.

Keyword

Diabetes mellitus, type 1; Internet; Mentors

MeSH Terms

Adult
Blood Glucose
Child
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Humans
Insulin
Internet
Mentors*
Parents
Quality of Life
Blood Glucose
Insulin

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Flow diagram of the study.

Reference

1. Secrest AM, Becker DJ, Kelsey SF, LaPorte RE, Orchard TJ. All-cause mortality trends in a large population-based cohort with long-standing childhood-onset type 1 diabetes: the Allegheny County type 1 diabetes registry. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33:2573–2579.

2. Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, Genuth SM, Lachin JM, Orchard TJ, Raskin P, Zinman B. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study Research Group. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353:2643–2653.

3. Eeg-Olofsson K, Cederholm J, Nilsson PM, Zethelius B, Svensson AM, Gudbjornsdottir S, Eliasson B. Glycemic control and cardiovascular disease in 7,454 patients with type 1 diabetes: an observational study from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR). Diabetes Care. 2010; 33:1640–1646.

4. Soedamah-Muthu SS, Chaturvedi N, Toeller M, Ferriss B, Reboldi P, Michel G, Manes C, Fuller JH. EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study Group. Risk factors for coronary heart disease in type 1 diabetic patients in Europe: the EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27:530–537.

5. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. J Pediatr. 1994; 125:177–188.

6. Williamson DA, Martin PD, White MA, Newton R, Walden H, York-Crowe E, Alfonso A, Gordon S, Ryan D. Efficacy of an internet-based behavioral weight loss program for overweight adolescent African-American girls. Eat Weight Disord. 2005; 10:193–203.

7. Nguyen B, Kornman KP, Baur LA. A review of electronic interventions for prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity in young people. Obes Rev. 2011; 12:e298–e314.

8. Azar M, Gabbay R. Web-based management of diabetes through glucose uploads: has the time come for telemedicine? Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009; 83:9–17.

9. Sullivan-Bolyai S, Lee MM. Parent mentor perspectives on providing social support to empower parents. Diabetes Educ. 2011; 37:35–43.

10. Korean Diabetes Association. Treatment guideline for diabetes. J Korean Diabetes. 2011; 12:Suppl 1. S1–S244.

11. Bradley C, Todd C, Gorton T, Symonds E, Martin A, Plowright R. The development of an individualized questionnaire measure of perceived impact of diabetes on quality of life: the ADDQoL. Qual Life Res. 1999; 8:79–91.

12. Lewis KS, Bradley C, Knight G, Boulton AJ, Ward JD. A measure of treatment satisfaction designed specifically for people with insulin-dependent diabetes. Diabet Med. 1988; 5:235–242.

13. Whittemore R, Jaser SS, Jeon S, Liberti L, Delamater A, Murphy K, Faulkner MS, Grey M. An internet coping skills training program for youth with type 1 diabetes: six-month outcomes. Nurs Res. 2012; 61:395–404.

14. Farmer AJ, Gibson OJ, Dudley C, Bryden K, Hayton PM, Tarassenko L, Neil A. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of real-time telemedicine support on glycemic control in young adults with type 1 diabetes (ISRCTN 46889446). Diabetes Care. 2005; 28:2697–2702.

15. Gay CL, Chapuis F, Bendelac N, Tixier F, Treppoz S, Nicolino M. Reinforced follow-up for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control: a randomized controlled trial intervention via the local pharmacist and telecare. Diabetes Metab. 2006; 32:159–165.

16. Heisler M, Vijan S, Makki F, Piette JD. Diabetes control with reciprocal peer support versus nurse care management: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 153:507–515.

17. Long JA, Jahnle EC, Richardson DM, Loewenstein G, Volpp KG. Peer mentoring and financial incentives to improve glucose control in African American veterans: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 156:416–424.

18. Montori VM, Helgemoe PK, Guyatt GH, Dean DS, Leung TW, Smith SA, Kudva YC. Telecare for patients with type 1 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control: a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27:1088–1094.

19. Ziegler R, Heidtmann B, Hilgard D, Hofer S, Rosenbauer J, Holl R. DPV-Wiss-Initiative. Frequency of SMBG correlates with HbA1c and acute complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2011; 12:11–17.

20. Miller KM, Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Goland RS, Haller MJ, McGill JB, Rodriguez H, Simmons JH, Hirsch IB. T1D Exchange Clinic Network. Evidence of a strong association between frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels in T1D exchange clinic registry participants. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36:2009–2014.

21. Levine BA, Turner JW, Robinson JD, Angelus P, Hu TM. Communication plays a critical role in web-based monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009; 3:461–467.

22. Heisler M. Different models to mobilize peer support to improve diabetes self-management and clinical outcomes: evidence, logistics, evaluation considerations and needs for future research. Fam Pract. 2010; 27:Suppl 1. i23–i32.

23. Biermann E, Dietrich W, Standl E. Telecare of diabetic patients with intensified insulin therapy: a randomized clinical trial. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2000; 77:327–332.

24. Kirsh S, Watts S, Pascuzzi K, O'Day ME, Davidson D, Strauss G, Kern EO, Aron DC. Shared medical appointments based on the chronic care model: a quality improvement project to address the challenges of patients with diabetes with high cardiovascular risk. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007; 16:349–353.

25. Trento M, Passera P, Bajardi M, Tomalino M, Grassi G, Borgo E, Donnola C, Cavallo F, Bondonio P, Porta M. Lifestyle intervention by group care prevents deterioration of type II diabetes: a 4-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Diabetologia. 2002; 45:1231–1239.

26. Klonoff DC. Diabetes and telemedicine: is the technology sound, effective, cost-effective, and practical? Diabetes Care. 2003; 26:1626–1628.