1. Henkel S. A better first impression: manufacturing dental restorations using impressions. J Dent Technology. 2008; 13–16.
2. Jones P. The iTero optical scanner for use with Invisalign: A descriptive review. Dent Implantol Update. 2008; 19:1–4.
3. Barker TM, Earwaker WJ, Lisle DA. Accuracy of stereolithographic models of human anatomy. Australas Radiol. 1994; 38:106–111.
Article
4. Kragskov J, Sindet-Pedersen S, Gyldensted C, Jensen KL. A comparison of three-dimensional computed tomography scans and stereolithographic models for evaluation of craniofacial anomalies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996; 54:402–411.
Article
5. Cuperus AM, Harms MC, Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JG, Breuning KH. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012; 142:308–313.
6. Lill W, Solar P, Ulm C, Watzek G, Blahout R, Matejka M. Reproducibility of three-dimensional CT-assisted model production in the maxillofacial area. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992; 30:233–236.
Article
7. Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124:101–105.
Article
8. Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74:298–303.
9. Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73:301–306.
10. Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129:794–803.
Article
11. Watanabe-Kanno GA, Abrão J, Miasiro Junior H, Sánchez-Ayala A, Lagravère MO. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models. Braz Oral Res. 2009; 23:288–295.
Article
12. Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136:16.e1–16.e4.
Article
13. Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P, Gladwin M. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132:346–352.
Article
14. Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov AI. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod. 2008; 35:191–201.
Article
15. Creed B, Kau CH, English JD, Xia JJ, Lee RP. A comparison of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained from cone beam computerized tomography images and digital models. Semin Orthod. 2011; 17:49–56.
Article
16. Alcan T, Ceylanoğlu C, Baysal B. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79:30–36.
Article
17. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.;1940. p. 122–132.
18. Henriksen M, Lund H, Moe-Nilssen R, Bliddal H, Danneskiod-Samsøe B. Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometric gait analysis. Gait Posture. 2004; 19:288–297.
Article
19. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1:307–310.
Article
20. Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons;1986. p. 76–78.
21. BeGole EA. Statistics for the orthodontist. In : Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, editors. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby;2000. p. 339–352.
22. Dalstra M, Melsen B. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod. 2009; 36:36–41.
Article
23. Mok KH, Cooke MS. Space analysis: a comparison between sonic digitization (DigiGraph Workstation) and the digital caliper. Eur J Orthod. 1998; 20:653–661.
Article
24. Asquith J, Gillgrass T, Mossey P. Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study. Eur J Orthod. 2007; 29:517–522.
Article
25. Linnet K. Limitations of the paired t-test for evaluation of method comparison data. Clin Chem. 1999; 45:314–315.
Article
26. Donatelli RE, Lee SJ. How to report reliability in orthodontic research: Part 1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 144:156–161.
Article
27. Reich S, Uhlen S, Gozdowski S, Lohbauer U. Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique. Clin Oral Investig. 2011; 15:521–526.
Article
28. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008; 29:494496498–505.
29. Klein HM, Schneider W, Alzen G, Voy ED, Günther RW. Pediatric craniofacial surgery: comparison of milling and stereolithography for 3D model manufacturing. Pediatr Radiol. 1992; 22:458–460.
Article
30. Petrzelka JE, Frank MC. Advanced process planning for subtractive rapid prototyping. Rapid Prototyping J. 2010; 16:216–224.
Article