Korean J Gastroenterol.  2014 Nov;64(5):253-255. 10.4166/kjg.2014.64.5.253.

Experience of Operator May Be More Crucial than Withdrawal Time of Colonoscopy for the Detection of Colonic Neoplasm

• Park JJ

• KMID: 2164426
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2014.64.5.253

Abstract

No abstract available.

MeSH Terms

Adenoma/*diagnosis
Colorectal Neoplasms/*diagnosis
Female
Humans
Male
*Professional Competence

Reference

References

1. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, et al. U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97:1296–1308.

2. Munroe CA, Lee P, Copland A, et al. A tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates during endoscopic training: a venture into uncharted territory. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012; 75:561–567.

3. Lee TJ, Rees CJ, Blanks RG, et al. Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy. 2014; 46:203–211.

4. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RL. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355:2533–2541.

5. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 63(4 Suppl):S16–S28.

6. Lee TJ, Blanks RG, Rees CJ, et al. Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England. Endoscopy. 2013; 45:20–26.

7. Lee TJ, Rutter MD, Blanks RG, et al. Colonoscopy quality meas-ures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Gut. 2012; 61:1050–1057.

8. Benson ME, Reichelderfer M, Said A, Gaumnitz EA, Pfau PR. Variation in colonoscopic technique and adenoma detection rates at an academic gastroenterology unit. Dig Dis Sci. 2010; 55:166–171.

9. Overholt BF, Brooks-Belli L, Grace M, et al. Benchmark Colonoscopy Group. Withdrawal times and associated factors in colonoscopy: a quality assurance multicenter assessment. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010; 44:e80–e86.

10. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Greenlaw RL. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 6:1091–1098.

11. Simmons DT, Harewood GC, Baron TH, et al. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006; 24:965–971.

12. Sanchez W, Harewood GC, Petersen BT. Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99:1941–1945.

13. Adler A, Wegscheider K, Lieberman D, et al. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3). Gut. 2013; 62:236–241.

14. Moritz V, Bretthauer M, Ruud HK, et al. Withdrawal time as a quality indicator for colonoscopy: a nationwide analysis. Endoscopy. 2012; 44:476–481.

15. Lee RH, Tang RS, Muthusamy VR, et al. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74:128–134.

16. Gellad ZF, Weiss DG, Ahnen DJ, Lieberman DA, Jackson GL, Provenzale D. Colonoscopy withdrawal time and risk of neoplasia at 5 years: results from VA Cooperative Studies Program 380. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105:1746–1752.

17. Taber A, Romagnuolo J. Effect of simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time on polyp and adenoma detection rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71:782–786.

18. Sawhney MS, Cury MS, Neeman N, et al. Effect of institution- wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection. Gastroenterology. 2008; 135:1892–1898.

19. Lin OS, Kozarek RA, Arai A, et al. The effect of periodic monitoring and feedback on screening colonoscopy withdrawal times, polyp detection rates, and patient satisfaction scores. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71:1253–1259.

20. Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000; 51:33–36.

21. Kim YD, Bae WK, Choi YH, et al. Difference in adenoma detection rates according to colonoscopic withdrawal times and the level of expertise. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2014; 64:278–283.