J Korean Neurosurg Soc.  2015 Dec;58(6):539-546. 10.3340/jkns.2015.58.6.539.

Learning Curve of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Based on the Period (Early vs. Late) and Technique (in-and-out vs. in-and-out-and-in): A Retrospective Comparative Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Spine Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ahnsangsoak@hanmail.net
  • 2Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Medical Center, Busan, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To report the learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for a surgeon who had not been previously exposed to this procedure based on the period and detailed technique with a retrospective matched comparative design.
METHODS
Of 213 patients with lumbar disc herniation encountered during the reference period, 35 patients who were followed up for 1 year after PELD were enrolled in this study. The patients were categorized by the period and technique of operation : group A, the first 15 cases, who underwent by the 'in-and-out' technique; group B, the next 20 cases, who underwent by the 'in-and-out-and-in' technique. The operation time, failure rate, blood loss, complication rate, re-herniation rate, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back and leg were checked. The alteration of dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCSA) between the preoperative and the postoperative MRI was checked.
RESULTS
Operative time was rapidly reduced in the early phase, and then tapered to a steady state for the 35 cases receiving the PELD. After surgery, VAS scores for the back and leg were decreased significantly in both groups. Complications occurred in 2 patients in group A and 2 patients in group B. Between the two groups, there were significant differences in operative time, improvement of leg VAS, and expansion of DSCSA.
CONCLUSION
PELD learning curve seems to be acceptable with sufficient preparation. However, because of their high tendency to delayed operation time, operation failure, and re-herniation, caution should be exercised at the early phase of the procedure.

Keyword

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy; Learning curve; Intervertebral disc herniation

MeSH Terms

Diskectomy*
Humans
Learning Curve*
Learning*
Leg
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Operative Time
Retrospective Studies*

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Preoperative and postoperative dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCSA) (mm2) at the index level. The space was drawn by an imaginary area at the narrowest lesion on the T2-weighted axial MRI.

  • Fig. 2 The entry point is indicated between the tip of the spinous process and the spino-laminar junction. Once the facet contact was established (1), the needle was withdrawn and redirected (dotted arrows) towards the posterolateral annulus by hooking the ventral border of the facet (2). F : Facet joint.

  • Fig. 3 The obturator should be directed towards posterolateral annulus by pushing the other end of the obturator down.

  • Fig. 4 After removal of central disc fragment, the working sheath was moved back to the epidural space (A), and the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) was removed in half-and-half view (B). D : herniated disc stained by indigocarmine, F : epidural fat, P : posterior longitudinal ligament.

  • Fig. 5 After removal of PLL, the posterolateral target fragment (gray area) was removed by introducing the working sheath from lateral to medial area.

  • Fig. 6 Flowchart depicting patient selection.

  • Fig. 7 Clinical outcomes using VAS scores. There were significant differences between the groups for the leg VAS at 3, 6, 12 months after surgery (p=*0.019, †0.001, ‡0.033, respectively). VAS : visual analogue scale.

  • Fig. 8 Expansion of DSCSA. There was significant difference between the groups (*p=0.002). DSCSA : dural sac cross-sectional area.

  • Fig. 9 Operation time was rapidly reduced in the early phase, and then tapered to a steady state for the 35 cases receiving the PELD. PELD : percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discetomy.


Reference

1. Chae KH, Ju CI, Lee SM, Kim BW, Kim SY, Kim HS. Strategies for noncontained lumbar disc herniation by an endoscopic approach : transforaminal suprapedicular approach, semi-rigid flexible curved probe, and 3-dimensional reconstruction CT with discogram. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009; 46:312–316. PMID: 19893718.
Article
2. Cho JY, Lee SH, Lee HY. Prevention of development of postoperative dysesthesia in transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for intracanalicular lumbar disc herniation : floating retraction technique. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2011; 54:214–218. PMID: 22287030.
Article
3. Choi G, Kang HY, Modi HN, Prada N, Nicolau RJ, Joh JY, et al. Risk of developing seizure after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011; 24:83–92. PMID: 20625320.
Article
4. Choi G, Modi HN, Prada N, Ahn TJ, Myung SH, Gang MS, et al. Clinical results of XMR-assisted percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy. J Orthop Surg Res. 2013; 8:14. PMID: 23705685.
Article
5. Choi I, Ahn JO, So WS, Lee SJ, Choi IJ, Kim H. Exiting root injury in transforaminal endoscopic discectomy : preoperative image considerations for safety. Eur Spine J. 2013; 22:2481–2487. PMID: 23754603.
Article
6. Choi KC, Kim JS, Ryu KS, Kang BU, Ahn Y, Lee SH. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation : transforaminal versus interlaminar approach. Pain Physician. 2013; 16:547–556. PMID: 24284840.
7. Han IH, Choi BK, Cho WH, Nam KH. The obturator guiding technique in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012; 51:182–186. PMID: 22639720.
Article
8. Hirano Y, Mizuno J, Takeda M, Itoh Y, Matsuoka H, Watanabe K. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy - early clinical experience. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2012; 52:625–630. PMID: 23006872.
Article
9. Hsu HT, Chang SJ, Yang SS, Chai CL. Learning curve of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Eur Spine J. 2013; 22:727–733. PMID: 23076645.
Article
10. Jasper GP, Francisco GM, Telfeian AE. Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for an extruded lumbar disc herniation. Pain Physician. 2013; 16:E31–E35. PMID: 23340542.
11. Joh JY, Choi G, Kong BJ, Park HS, Lee SH, Chang SH. Comparative study of neck pain in relation to increase of cervical epidural pressure during percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34:2033–2038. PMID: 19675511.
Article
12. Kafadar A, Kahraman S, Akbörü M. Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy : a critical appraisal. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2006; 49:74–79. PMID: 16708335.
Article
13. Kang SH, Park SW. Symptomatic post-discectomy pseudocyst after endoscopic lumbar discectomy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2011; 49:31–36. PMID: 21494360.
Article
14. Kim HS, Ju CI, Kim SW, Kim JG. Endoscopic transforaminal suprapedicular approach in high grade inferior migrated lumbar disc herniation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009; 45:67–73. PMID: 19274114.
Article
15. Kim HS, Park JY. Comparative assessment of different percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy (PEID) techniques. Pain Physician. 2013; 16:359–367. PMID: 23877452.
16. Lee DY, Ahn Y, Lee SH. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for adolescent lumbar disc herniation : surgical outcomes in 46 consecutive patients. Mt Sinai J Med. 2006; 73:864–870. PMID: 17117312.
17. Lee DY, Lee SH. Learning curve for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2008; 48:383–388. discussion 388-389PMID: 18812679.
Article
18. Lee S, Kim SK, Lee SH, Kim WJ, Choi WC, Choi G, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for migrated disc herniation : classification of disc migration and surgical approaches. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16:431–437. PMID: 16972067.
Article
19. Lohman CM, Tallroth K, Kettunen JA, Lindgren KA. Comparison of radiologic signs and clinical symptoms of spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31:1834–1840. PMID: 16845360.
Article
20. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Use of newly developed instruments and endoscopes : full-endoscopic resection of lumbar disc herniations via the interlaminar and lateral transforaminal approach. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007; 6:521–530. PMID: 17561740.
Article
21. Sairyo K, Egawa H, Matsuura T, Takahashi M, Higashino K, Sakai T, et al. State of the art : transforaminal approach for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy under local anesthesia. J Med Invest. 2014; 61:217–225. PMID: 25264038.
Article
22. Sairyo K, Matsuura T, Higashino K, Sakai T, Takata Y, Goda Y, et al. Surgery related complications in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy under local anesthesia. J Med Invest. 2014; 61:264–269. PMID: 25264043.
Article
23. Sencer A, Yorukoglu AG, Akcakaya MO, Aras Y, Aydoseli A, Boyali O, et al. Fully endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy : short-term clinical results of 163 surgically treated patients. World Neurosurg. 2014; 82:884–890. PMID: 24907438.
Article
24. Sirvanci M, Bhatia M, Ganiyusufoglu KA, Duran C, Tezer M, Ozturk C, et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis : correlation with Oswestry Disability Index and MR imaging. Eur Spine J. 2008; 17:679–685. PMID: 18324426.
Article
25. Wang H, Huang B, Zheng W, Li C, Zhang Z, Wang J, et al. Comparison of early and late percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013; 155:1931–1936. PMID: 23975645.
Article
26. Xin G, Shi-Sheng H, Hai-Long Z. Morphometric analysis of the YESS and TESSYS techniques of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Clin Anat. 2013; 26:728–734. PMID: 23824995.
Article
27. Yeung AT, Tsou PM. Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation : surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27:722–731. PMID: 11923665.
Full Text Links
  • JKNS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr