1. Haentjens P, Handelberg F, Casteleyn PP, Opdecam P. The Müller acetabular support ring. A preliminary review of indications and clinical results. Int Orthop. 1986. 10:223–230.
2. Gill TJ, Sledge JB, Müller ME. The Bürch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: indications, principles and long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998. 80:946–953.
3. Berry DJ, Müller ME. Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992. 74:711–715.
Article
4. Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, Clauss M, Mau H, Breusch SJ. Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: outcome in 164 hips followed for 2-17 years. Acta Orthop. 2006. 77:234–241.
Article
5. Gill TJ, Siebenrock K, Oberholzer R, Ganz R. Acetabular reconstruction in developmental dysplasia of the hip: results of the acetabular reinforcement ring with hook. J Arthroplasty. 1999. 14:131–137.
6. Gerber A, Pisan M, Zurakowski D, Isler B. Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003. 85-A:2358–2364.
Article
7. Schatzker J, Wong MK. Acetabular revision. The role of rings and cages. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999. 369:187–197.
8. Winter E, Piert M, Volkmann R, et al. Allogeneic cancellous bone graft and a Burch-Schneider ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001. 83-A:862–867.
Article
9. Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, Clauss M, Mau H, Breusch SJ. Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: outcome in 164 hips followed for 2-17 years. Acta Orthop. 2006. 77:234–241.
Article
10. Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 1994. 9:33–44.
Article
11. Winter E, Piert M, Volkmann R, et al. Allogeneic cancellous bone graft and a Burch-Schneider ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001. 83-A:862–867.
Article
12. Zehntner MK, Ganz R. Midterm results (5.5-10 years) of acetabular allograft reconstruction with the acetabular reinforcement ring during total hip revision. J Arthroplasty. 1994. 9:469–479.
Article
13. Peters CL, Curtain M, Samuelson KM. Acetabular revision with the Burch-Schnieder antiprotrusio cage and cancellous allograft bone. J Arthroplasty. 1995. 10:307–312.
Article
14. Bierbaum BE. Turner RH, Scheller AD, editors. Acetabular revision arthroplasty. Revision total hip arthroplasty. 1982. New York: Grune & Stratton;42–79.
15. Korovessis P, Stamatakis M, Baikousis A, Katonis P, Petsinis G. Mueller roof reinforcement rings. Medium-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999. 362:125–137.
16. Oh I, Harris WH. Design concepts, indications, and surgical technique for use of the protrusio shell. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982. 162:175–184.
Article
17. Eggli S, Müller C, Ganz R. Revision surgery in pelvic discontinuity: an analysis of seven patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002. 398:136–145.
18. Paprosky WG, Magnus RE. Principles of bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994. 298:147–155.
19. Gross AE, Allan DG, Catre M, Garbuz DS, Stockley I. Bone grafts in hip replacement surgery. The pelvic side. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993. 24:679–695.
20. Gross AE, Duncan CP, Garbuz D, Mohamed EM. Revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum in association with loss of bone stock. Instr Course Lect. 1999. 48:57–66.
21. Korovessis P, Stamatakis M, Baikousis A, Katonis P, Petsinis G. Mueller roof reinforcement rings. Medium-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999. 362:125–137.
22. Haentjens P, de Boeck H, Handelberg F, Casteleyn PP, Opdecam P. Cemented acetabular reconstruction with the Muller support ring. A minimum five-year clinical and roentgenographic follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993. 290:225–235.
23. Siebenrock KA, Trochsler M, Sadri H, Ganz R. Hooked roof cup in revision of difficult loose hip prosthesis cups. Results after a minimum of 10 years. Orthopade. 2001. 30:273–279.