J Korean Neurosurg Soc.  2013 May;53(5):288-292. 10.3340/jkns.2013.53.5.288.

Vertebral Distraction during Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Causes Postoperative Neck Pain

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, CHA University, Pocheon, Korea.
  • 2Department of Neurosurgery, TeunTeun Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Neurology, CHA University, Pocheon, Korea.
  • 4Department of Medical Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, Korea. shindongah@me.com
  • 5Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
Vertebral distraction is routinely performed during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Overdistraction can injure the facet joints and may cause postoperative neck pain consequently. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical relevance of distraction force during ACDF.
METHODS
This study included 24 consecutive patients with single level cervical disc disease undergoing single level ACDF. We measure the maximum torque just before the the arm of the Caspar retractor was suspended by the rachet mechanism by turning the lever on the movable arm using a torque meter. In order to turn the lever using the torque driver, we made a linear groove on the top of the lever. We compared the neck disability index (NDI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores between the high torque group (distraction force>6 kgf.cm) and the low torque group (distraction force< or =6 kgf.cm) at routine postoperative intervals of 1, 3, 5 days and 1, 3, 6 months.
RESULTS
The VAS scores for posterior neck pain had a linear correlation with torque at postoperative 1st and 3rd days (y=0.99x-1.1, r2=0.82; y=0.77x-0.63, r2=0.73, respectively). VAS scores for posterior neck pain were lower in the low torque group than in the high torque group on both 1 and 3 days postoperatively (3.1+/-1.3, 2.6+/-1.0 compared with 6.0+/-0.6, 4.9+/-0.8, p<0.01). However, the difference in NDI scores was not statistically significant in all postoperative periods.
CONCLUSION
Vertebral distraction may cause posterior neck pain in the immediate postoperative days. We recommend not to distract the intervertebral disc space excessively with a force of more than 6.0 kgf.cm.

Keyword

Postoperative pain; Zygapophyseal joint; Spinal fusion; Cervical spine

MeSH Terms

Arm
Diskectomy
Humans
Intervertebral Disc
Neck
Neck Pain
Pain, Postoperative
Spinal Fusion
Torque
Zygapophyseal Joint

Figure

  • Fig. 1 An illustration of the measurement of distraction force by a torque driver and the Caspar retractor.

  • Fig. 2 The correlation between the VAS scores for neck pain and distraction force throughout the postoperative period in patients undergoing ACDF. VAS : visual analogue scale, ACDF : anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

  • Fig. 3 The comparison of VAS scores for posterior neck pain throughout the postoperative period between the low torque group and the high torque group. VAS : visual analogue scale.

  • Fig. 4 The comparison of NDI scores throughout the postoperative period between the low torque group and the high torque group. NDI : neck disability index.


Cited by  1 articles

Rare Intractable Cervicalgia Related to Exaggerated Disc Height Distraction : Report of Two Cases and Literature Review
Man Kyu Choi, Sung Bum Kim, Jun Ho Lee
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2018;61(4):530-536.    doi: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0186.


Reference

1. Aryan HE, Newman CB, Lu DC, Hu SS, Tay BK, Bradford DS, et al. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy : a biomechanical study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009; 22:100–104. PMID: 19342931.
Article
2. Bailey RW, Badgley CE. Stabilization of the cervical spine by anterior fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1960; 42-A:565–594. PMID: 13848906.
Article
3. Caspar W, Barbier DD, Klara PM. Anterior cervical fusion and Caspar plate stabilization for cervical trauma. Neurosurgery. 1989; 25:491–502. PMID: 2797387.
Article
4. Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg. 1958; 15:602–617. PMID: 13599052.
Article
5. Demetropoulos CK, Truumees E, Herkowitz HN, Yang KH. Development and calibration of a load sensing cervical distractor capable of withstanding autoclave sterilization. Med Eng Phys. 2005; 27:343–346. PMID: 15823476.
Article
6. Frank E, Chamberland D, Ragel B. A proposed technique for intraoperative measurement of cervical spine stiffness. Neurosurgery. 1996; 39:147–150. PMID: 8805151.
Article
7. Goffin J, Plets C, Van den Bergh R. Anterior cervical fusion and osteosynthetic stabilization according to Caspar : a prospective study of 41 patients with fractures and/or dislocations of the cervical spine. Neurosurgery. 1989; 25:865–871. PMID: 2601816.
Article
8. King JS, Lagger R. Sciatica viewed as a referred pain syndrome. Surg Neurol. 1976; 5:46–50. PMID: 772852.
9. Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Michael CJ. The tissue origin of low back pain and sciatica : a report of pain response to tissue stimulation during operations on the lumbar spine using local anesthesia. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991; 22:181–187. PMID: 1826546.
10. Leclaire R, Fortin L, Lambert R, Bergeron YM, Rossignol M. Radiofrequency facet joint denervation in the treatment of low back pain : a placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess efficacy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26:1411–1416. discussion 1417. PMID: 11458140.
Article
11. Lee KE, Thinnes JH, Gokhin DS, Winkelstein BA. A novel rodent neck pain model of facet-mediated behavioral hypersensitivity : implications for persistent pain and whiplash injury. J Neurosci Methods. 2004; 137:151–159. PMID: 15262055.
Article
12. Manchikanti L, Singh V, Falco FJ, Cash KM, Fellows B. Cervical medial branch blocks for chronic cervical facet joint pain : a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial with one-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33:1813–1820. PMID: 18670333.
13. Olsewski JM, Garvey TA, Schendel MJ. Biomechanical analysis of facet and graft loading in a Smith-Robinson type cervical spine model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994; 19:2540–2544. PMID: 7855678.
Article
14. Panjabi MM. Clinical spinal instability and low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003; 13:371–379. PMID: 12832167.
Article
15. Truumees E, Demetropoulos CK, Yang KH, Herkowitz HN. Effects of disc height and distractive forces on graft compression in an anterior cervical discectomy model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27:2441–2445. PMID: 12435972.
Article
16. Truumees E, Demetropoulos CK, Yang KH, Herkowitz HN. Effects of disc height and distractive forces on graft compression in an anterior cervical corpectomy model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33:1438–1441. PMID: 18520939.
Article
17. Winkelstein BA, Santos DG. An intact facet capsular ligament modulates behavioral sensitivity and spinal glial activation produced by cervical facet joint tension. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33:856–862. PMID: 18404104.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKNS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr